This commit changes fixit messages from a question/suggestion to an
imperative message for protocol conformances and switch-case. Addresses
https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/67510.
Also, make some related changes, like updating a path in the Android doc, making sure the
`unknown` vendor is always used, and using `CPU` instead of `CODEGENERATOR`.
Previously, when evaluating a `#if canImport(Module, _version: 42)` directive the compiler could diagnose and ignore the directive under the following conditions:
- The associated binary module is corrupt/bogus.
- The .tbd for an underlying Clang module is missing a current-version field.
This behavior is surprising when there is a valid `.swiftinterface` available and it only becomes apparent when building against an SDK with an old enough version of the module that the version in the `.swiftinterface` is too low, making this failure easy to miss. Some modules have different versioning systems for their Swift and Clang modules and it can also be intentional for a distributed binary `.swiftmodule` to contain bogus data (to force the compiler to recompile the `.swiftinterface`) so we need to handle both of these cases gracefully and predictably.
Now the compiler will enumerate all module loaders, ask each of them to attempt to parse the module version and then consistently use the parsed version from a single source. The `.swiftinterface` is preferred if present, then the binary module if present, and then finally the `.tbd`. The `.tbd` is still always used exclusively for the `_underlyingVersion` variant of `canImport()`.
Resolves rdar://88723492
The ClangImporter tests for `#if canImport(..., _underlyingVersion: ...)` do not really depend on a Swift overlay being present for Simple.framework, so remove the overlay related `RUN` steps.
The `SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` define is used to stamp a vendor’s version number into a Swift compiler binary. It can be queried from Swift code using `#if _compiler_version` and from Clang by using a preprocessor definition called `__SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION`. These are unsupported compiler-internal features used primarily by Apple Swift.
In Swift 1.0 through 5.5, Apple Swift used a scheme for `SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` where the major version matched the embedded clang (e.g. 1300 for Apple Clang 13.0.0) and the minor version was ignored. Starting in Swift 5.6, Apple Swift started using major and minor version numbers that matched the Swift.org version number. This makes them easier to understand, but it means that version 1300.0.x was followed by version 5.6.x. Not only did version numbers go backwards, but also the old logic to ignore minor versions was now a liability, because it meant you would not be able to target a change to 5.7.x compilers but not 5.6.x compilers.
This commit addresses the problem by:
* Modifying the existing `#if _compiler_version(string-literal)` feature so it transforms the major version into a major and minor that will compare correctly to new version numbers. For instance, “1300.*” is transformed into “1.300”, which will compare correctly to a “5.6” or “5.7” version even if it doesn’t really capture the fact that “1300” was a Swift 5.5 compiler. As a bonus, this allows you to use the feature to backwards-compatibly test new compilers using the existing feature: “5007.*” will be seen by compilers before 5.7 as an unknown future version, but will be seen by 5.7 compilers as targeting them.
* Modifying the `__SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` clang define similarly so that, to preprocessor conditions written for the old scheme, a 5.7 compiler will appear to have major version 5007.
* Adding a new variant of `#if _compiler_version` with the same syntax as `#if swift` and `#if compiler`—that is, taking a comparison operator and a bare set of dotted version numbers, rather than a string literal. Going forward, this will be how version checks are written once compatibility with compilers before this change is no longer a concern.
These changes are only lightly tested because tests have to work without any compiler version defined (the default in most configurations), but I’ve tested what I can.
Fixes rdar://89841295.
The *-simulator target triples have been used consistently in tools for
several years to indicate simulator targets. Stop inferring the
simulator part, rdar://problem/35810403.
The *-simulator target triples have been used consistently in tools for
several years to indicate simulator targets. Stop inferring the
simulator part, rdar://problem/35810403.
Add the platform conditional and set up other basics for the toolchain.
The ConditionalCompilation tests are updated to match, since otherwise
they seem to trip when building on non-OpenBSD platforms. The
Driver/linker test is updated to ensure lld is passed on this platform.
Note that OpenBSD calls "x86_64" as "amd64", so we use that name for the
architecture instead of trying to alias one to the other, as this makes
things simpler.
Add support for conditional compilation under macCatalyst
Developers can now detect whether they are compiling for macCatalyst at
compile time with:
#if targetEnvironment(macCatalyst)
// Code only compiled under macCatalyst.
#end
This adds the initial conditional compilation support for the WASM32
"architecture" assuming that WASI is used as the "OS". Support for
baremetal targets in Swift needs more work still, but this gives enough
infrastructure to start playing with WASM.
For example, for "#if os(simulator)", offer a fixit to change
"os" to "targetEnvironment", instead of offering to change "simulator".
Resolves SR-11037.
- When parsing a type or extension declaration, attempt to parse a function or property declaration when meeting an identifier, an operator or a paren (for tuple declarations).
- Produce the diagnostic with a fix-it suggesting to insert the needed keyword
- Recover parsing as if the declaration with the missing keyword is a function/property declaration
Resolves https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-10477
There are similar tests for other architectures/OS pairs, but
android-aarch64 was missing. This should ensure that the conditional
compilation for Android works correctly in this case.
Try to fix constraint system in a way where member
reference is going to be defined in terms of its use,
which makes it seem like parameters match arguments
exactly. Such helps to produce solutions and diagnose
failures related to missing members precisely.
These changes would be further extended to diagnose use
of unavailable members and other structural member failures.
Resolves: rdar://problem/34583132
Resolves: rdar://problem/36989788
Resolved: rdar://problem/39586166
Resolves: rdar://problem/40537782
Resolves: rdar://problem/46211109
Until now, only ">=" was supported in #if swift() expressions, for example:
```#if swift(>=2.1)
```#endif
This means that if we want to evaluate code only when the language version is
less than a particular version we need to do the following:
```#if !swift(>=2.1)
```#endif
An alernative to make this more readable (the "!" can be easily missed in a code
review) is to introduce another supported unary operator, "<". The previous
example could be rewritten like this:
```#if swift(<2.1)
```#endif
This commit adds support for that unary operator, along with some tests.
This is our first statement attribute, made more complicated by the
fact that a 'case'/'default' isn't really a normal statement. I've
chosen /not/ to implement a general statement attribute logic like we
have for types and decls at this time, but I did get the compiler
parsing arbitrary attributes before 'case' and 'default'. As a bonus,
we now treat all cases within functions as being switch-like rather
than enum-like, which is better for recovery when not in a switch.
This converts the instances of the pattern for which we have a proper
substitution in lit. This will make it easier to replace it
appropriately with Windows equivalents.
