It turns out that we must allow declarations with `introduced:` availability
nested inside of other declarations that are `unavailable` in order to
influence weak linking. Stop diagnosing declarations as being more available
than their unavailable containers and revert some changes to availability
inference that were designed to avoid creating these nestings but caused
regressions for declarations marked `@_spi_available.`
Reverts parts of https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/64310,
https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/64015, and
https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/62900.
Previously, when creating availability attributes for synthesized declarations
we would identify some set of reference declarations that the synthesized
declaration should be as-available-as. The availability attributes of the
reference declarations would then be merged together to create the attributes
for the synthesized declaration. The problem with this approach is that the
reference declarations themselves may implicitly inherit availability from their
enclosing scopes, so the resulting merged attributes could be incomplete. The
fix is to walk though the enclosing scopes of the reference declarations,
merging the availability attributes found at each level.
Additionally, the merging algorithm that produces inferred availability
attributes failed to deal with conflicts between platform specific and platform
agnostic availability. Now the merging algorithm notices when platform agnostic
availability should take precedence and avoids generating conflicting platform
specific attributes.
Resolves rdar://106575142
If a modify/mutableAddress coroutine is defined with availability, or a property wrapper adds a setter with availability,
then the implicit synthesized setter should be as available as those declarations it's synthesized from. rdar://problem/65152582
