previously I was allowing these because I thought there was
some representational difference if the enum is raw. it
turns out that a raw enum is only useful if you synthesize
conformance to RawRepresentable. since I disabled that
synthesis it's kind of silly to still allow the raw type
to be written at all.
rdar://110539937
- replaces "move-only" terminology with "noncopyable"
- replaces compiler jargon like "guaranteed parameters"
and "lvalue" with corresponding language-level notions
- simplifies diagnostics about closures.
and probably more.
rdar://109281444
The reason why we are doing this is that:
1. For non-copyable types, switches are always at +1 for now.
2. non-copyable enums with deinits cannot be switched upon since that would
invalidate the deinit.
So deinits on non-copyable enums are just not useful at this point since you
cannot open the enum.
Once we make it so that you can bind a non-copyable enum at +0, we will
remove this check.
I added an experimental feature MoveOnlyEnumDeinits so tests that validate the
codegen/etc will still work.
rdar://101651138
the main things still left behind the experimental flag(s) are
- move-only classes (guarded by MoveOnlyClasses feature)
- noimplicitcopy
- the _borrow operator
Specifically:
1. Fix the error message so that when we say you can't have a deinit that a
deinit can be on a noncopyable type along side a class or an actor.
2. Even though we already error on @objc enums and say they cannot be
noncopyable, we did not emit an error on the deinit saying that @objc enums
cannot have a deinit. I put in a nice to have error just to make it even
clearer.
rdar://105855978
rdar://106566054
