- Allow an if/switch expression to become an
implicit return of a function that has a `#if`
body with a single active element that is an `if`
or `switch`.
- Allow `#if` branches of an if/switch expression,
as long as there is a single active expression
element.
rdar://107487977
Look through `try`/`await` markers when looking for
out of place if/switch expressions, and customize
the effect checking diagnostic such that we error
that `try`/`await` are redundant on `if`/`switch`
expressions.
Introduce SingleValueStmtExpr, which allows the
embedding of a statement in an expression context.
This then allows us to parse and type-check `if`
and `switch` statements as expressions, gated
behind the `IfSwitchExpression` experimental
feature for now. In the future,
SingleValueStmtExpr could also be used for e.g
`do` expressions.
For now, only single expression branches are
supported for producing a value from an
`if`/`switch` expression, and each branch is
type-checked independently. A multi-statement
branch may only appear if it ends with a `throw`,
and it may not `break`, `continue`, or `return`.
The placement of `if`/`switch` expressions is also
currently limited by a syntactic use diagnostic.
Currently they're only allowed in bindings,
assignments, throws, and returns. But this could
be lifted in the future if desired.
If all solutions point to the same overload choice that needs
re-labeling it's safe to diagnose it as if there was no ambiguity
because the call site is static.
The logic here could form AST loops due to passing
in `anchor` for the key path's parsed path.
However setting a parsed path here seems to be a
holdover from the CSDiag days, so set the path to
`nullptr` and rip out and the rest of the synthesis
and SanitizeExpr logic for it.
rdar://85236369
If underlying type of an optional chain has been marked as a hole,
e.g. due to a reference to an invalid or missing member, let's
propagate that information to object type of an optional that
represents a result of an optional chain.
Resolves: rdar://80941497
It's not permitted to use `PartialKeyPath` type to resolve a key path
expression, because that type is intended to be a type-erased version of
a fully resolved `KeyPath` type.
In situations where contextual type is a partial key path (e.g. parameter
type is a partial key path), let's replace it with a `KeyPath` type that
is a subtype of `PartialKeyPath` and allow value inference to happen.
Resolves: SR-5667
Resolves: rdar://32365183
Restrict filtering in `simplifyAppliedOverloadsImpl` to disable
overload set for operators only, because other calls e.g. regular
functions or subscripts could be filtered on labels and are less
overloaded.
Filtering non-operator calls could also lead to incorrect diagnostics
because first choice could have all sorts of different issues e.g.
incorrect labels and number of parameters.
Resolves: rdar://55369704
If member has been bound before the base and the base was
incorrect at that (e.g. fallback to default `Any` type),
then we need to re-activate all of the constraints
associated with this member reference otherwise some of
the constraints could be left unchecked in inactive state.
This is especially important for key path expressions because
`key path` constraint can't be retired until all components
are simplified.
Resolves: SR-13364
Resolves: rdar://66706980
Resolves: rdar://74711236
We now mark some DeclRefExpr and LookupExprs as implicitly async
during typechecking, depending on whether they appear in a context
that is only performing a read / get operation, and whether they
are cross-actor operations.
also resolves rdar://72403401 by improving the error messages
(no more vague "'await' in async context" when its clearly a call!)
The `try await` ordering is both easier to read and indicates the order
of operations better, because the suspension point occurs first and
then one can observe a thrown error.
Currently, we don't have a fix-it to insert 'async', so I've marked those places
as not expecting a fix-it, until someone goes and implements that (rdar://72313654)
Let's consider conditional requirement failure to mean that parent
conformance requirement wasn't satisfied and nothing more, that helps
to disambiguate certain situations and avoid filtering out conditional
failures.
Resolves: rdar://problem/64844584
