Previously we would wait until CSApply, which
would trigger their type-checking in
`coercePatternToType`. This caused a number of
bugs, and hampered solver-based completion, which
does not run CSApply. Instead, form a conjunction
of all the ExprPatterns present, which preserves
some of the previous isolation behavior (though
does not provide complete isolation).
We can then modify `coercePatternToType` to accept
a closure, which allows the solver to take over
rewriting the ExprPatterns it has already solved.
This then sets the stage for the complete removal
of `coercePatternToType`, and doing all pattern
type-checking in the solver.
Only fully resolved substitutions are eligible to be considered
as conflicting, if holes are involved in any position that automatically
disqualifies a generic parameter.
Resolves: rdar://108534555
Resolves: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/63450
Follow-up to https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/65048
`getDesugaredType` unwraps sugar types that appear in sequence,
to remove sugar from nested positions we need to get a canonical type.
Thanks to @slavapestov for pointing it out.
Generic type aliases, unless desugared, could bring unrelated type variables
into the scope i.e. `TypeAlias<$T, $U>.Context` is actually `_Context<$U>`.
These variables could be inferrable only after the the body the closure is
solved. To avoid that, let's adjust `TypeVariableRefFinder` to desugar types
before collecting referenced type variables.
Resolves: rdar://107835060
Previously, when creating availability attributes for synthesized declarations
we would identify some set of reference declarations that the synthesized
declaration should be as-available-as. The availability attributes of the
reference declarations would then be merged together to create the attributes
for the synthesized declaration. The problem with this approach is that the
reference declarations themselves may implicitly inherit availability from their
enclosing scopes, so the resulting merged attributes could be incomplete. The
fix is to walk though the enclosing scopes of the reference declarations,
merging the availability attributes found at each level.
Additionally, the merging algorithm that produces inferred availability
attributes failed to deal with conflicts between platform specific and platform
agnostic availability. Now the merging algorithm notices when platform agnostic
availability should take precedence and avoids generating conflicting platform
specific attributes.
Resolves rdar://106575142
Introduce SingleValueStmtExpr, which allows the
embedding of a statement in an expression context.
This then allows us to parse and type-check `if`
and `switch` statements as expressions, gated
behind the `IfSwitchExpression` experimental
feature for now. In the future,
SingleValueStmtExpr could also be used for e.g
`do` expressions.
For now, only single expression branches are
supported for producing a value from an
`if`/`switch` expression, and each branch is
type-checked independently. A multi-statement
branch may only appear if it ends with a `throw`,
and it may not `break`, `continue`, or `return`.
The placement of `if`/`switch` expressions is also
currently limited by a syntactic use diagnostic.
Currently they're only allowed in bindings,
assignments, throws, and returns. But this could
be lifted in the future if desired.
It's ok to drop the global-actor qualifier `@G` from a function's type if:
- the cast is happening in a context isolated to global-actor `G`
- the function value will not be `@Sendable`
- the function value is not `async`
It's primarily safe to drop the attribute because we're already in the
same isolation domain. So it's OK to simply drop the global-actor
if we prevent the value from later leaving that isolation domain.
This means we no longer need to warn about code like this:
```
@MainActor func doIt(_ x: [Int], _ f: @MainActor (Int) -> ()) {
x.forEach(f)
// warning: converting function value of type '@MainActor (Int) -> ()' to '(Int) throws -> Void' loses global actor 'MainActor'
}
```
NOTE: this implementation is a bit gross in that the constraint solver
might emit false warnings about casts it introduced that are actually
safe. This is mainly because closure isolation is only fully determined
after constraint solving. See the FIXME's for more details.
resolves rdar://94462333
If a (partial) solution has a type variable it could only be unbound
if `FreeTypeVariableBinding` is set to `Allow`, in all other cases
solution would either have a fully resolved type or a hole.
`applySolution` shouldn't second guess `finalize()` and just apply
a solution as given. This is very important for multi-statement closures
because their elements are solved in isolation and opaque value types
inferred for their result could contain not-yet-resolved type variables
from outer context in their substitution maps (which it totally legal
under bi-directional inference).
Update `applyPropertyWrapperToParameter` to set types to projected
and wrapped values and allow `TypeVariableRefFinder` to skip decls
with implicit property wrappers that are not yet resolved.
The three options are now:
* `explicit`: Enforce Sendable constraints where it has been explicitly adopted and perform actor-isolation checking wherever code has adopted concurrency. (This is the default)
* `targeted`: Enforce Sendable constraints and perform actor-isolation checking wherever code has adopted concurrency, including code that has explicitly adopted Sendable.
* `complete`: Enforce Sendable constraints and actor-isolation checking throughout the entire module.
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/40708 which only considers
closures, but it missed the case when builder is applied to function body - in such
cases the declaration context is going to be a function/getter declaration.
Resolves: rdar://91150414
This effectively reverts 6823744779
The blanket removal of isolation in default-value expressions had
unintented consequences for important workflows. It's still
a problem that needs to be addressed, but we need to be more precise
about the problematic situations.
`repairFailures` needs a special case when l-value conversion is
associated with a result type of subscript setter because otherwise
it falls through and treats result type as if it's an argument type,
which leads to crashes.
Resolves: rdar://84580119
This patch delays the removal of redundant isolation for inferred
global-actor isolation to Swift 6 too, since we only warn about it
changing in Swift 5. Otherwise, only isolation that is a byproduct
of inference no longer needs an await, which will probably confuse
people.
This change is with respect to SE-327, which argues that the
non-static stored properties of ordinary structs do not need
global-actor isolation.
If a struct is a property-wrapper, then global-actor isolation
still applies to the `wrappedValue`, even if it's a stored property.
This is needed in order to support the propagation of global-actor
isolation through the wrapper, even when the programmer has opted
to use a stored property instead of a computed one for the
`wrappedValue`. Since this propagation is a useful pattern, I think
this exception is reasonable.
`ContextualFailure` is the main beneficiary of additional information
associated with `ContextualType` element because it no longer has to
query solution for "purpose" of the contextual information.
Resolves: rdar://68795727
Type inside of an editor placeholder is more of a hint than anything else,
so if it's incorrect let's diagnose that and use type variable instead to
allow solver to make forward progress.
Resolves: SR-14213
Resolves: rdar://74356736
A lot of operators (and most likely regular functions a well) have
overloads that accept i.e. a generic parameter that conforms to
`StringProtocol`, so the best fix in situations when argument is
a raw representable type would be to check whether `.rawValue`
conforms to the expected protocol and use it if so.
Resolves rdar://problem/75367157
Since labels are considered part of the name, mismatches in labeling
should be invalidate overload choices. Let's prefer an overload with
correct labels but incorrect types over the one with incorrect labels.
This also means that it's possible to restore performance optimizations
related to early filtering in diagnostic mode, which is important for
deeply nested code i.e. SwiftUI views.
Is the same argument is out-of-order in multiple solutions, let's
diagnose it as if there was no ambiguity.
Resolves: SR-14093
Resolves: rdar://73600328
It's possible that different overload choices could have the same
conformance requirement, so diagnostics should be able to emit an
error in situations where multiple solutions point to the missing
conformance at the same location (both in AST and requirement list).
Resolves: rdar://74447308
If one of the statements in the result builder body fails to
apply solution, let's fail entire rewrite attempt, otherwise
type-checker would end up with AST that has null pointers for
some child nodes.
Resolves: rdar://problem/70256351
