Mangling this information for future directions like component lifetimes
becomes complex and the current mangling scheme isn't scalable anyway.
Deleting this support for now.
Some requirement machine work
Rename requirement to Value
Rename more things to Value
Fix integer checking for requirement
some docs and parser changes
Minor fixes
Instead of adding a "flag" (`m` in `...Tgm5`) make it more generic to allow to drop any unused argument.
Add all dropped arguments with a `t<n-1>` (where `<n-1>` is empty for n === 0). For example `...Ttt2g5`.
This corresponds to the parameter-passing convention of the Itanium C++
ABI, in which the argument is passed indirectly and possibly modified,
but not destroyed, by the callee.
@in_cxx is handled the same way as @in in callers and @in_guaranteed in
callees. OwnershipModelEliminator emits the call to destroy_addr that is
needed to destroy the argument in the caller.
rdar://122707697
The names of the private witness table accessor thunks we generate for
an opaque return type mangle the concrete conformance of the underlying
type.
If a conformance requirement of the opaque return type was witnessed by
a conditional conformance of a variadic generic type, we would crash
because of an unimplemented case in the mangler.
Fixes rdar://problem/125668798.
Invertible protocols are currently always mangled with `Ri`, followed by
a single letter for each invertible protocol (e.g., `c` and `e` for
`Copyable` and `Escapable`, respectively), followed by the generic
parameter index. However, this requires that we extend the mangling
for any future invertible protocols, which mean they won't be
backward compatible.
Replace this mangling with one that mangles the bit # for the
invertible protocol, e.g., `Ri_` (followed by the generic parameter
index) is bit 0, which is `Copyable`. `Ri0_` (then generic parameter
index) is bit 1, which is `Escapable`. This allows us to round-trip
through mangled names for any invertible protocol, without any
knowledge of what the invertible protocol is, providing forward
compatibility. The same forward compatibility is present in all
metadata and the runtime, allowing us to add more invertible
protocols in the future without updating any of them, and also
allowing backward compatibility.
Only the demangling to human-readable strings maps the bit numbers
back to their names, and there's a fallback printing with just the bit
number when appropriate.
Also generalize the mangling a bit to allow for mangling of invertible
requirements on associated types, e.g., `S.Sequence: ~Copyable`. This
is currently unsupported by the compiler or runtime, but that may
change, and it was easy enough to finish off the mangling work for it.
rdar://119329771
This layout allows adding pre-specializations for trivial types that have a different size, but the same stride. This is especially useful for collections, where the stride is the important factor.
Function body macros allow one to introduce a function body for a
particular function, either providing a body for a function that
doesn't have one, or wholesale replacing the body of a function that
was written with a new one.
Using symbolic references instead of a text based mangling avoids the
expensive type descriptor scan when objective c protocols are requested.
rdar://111536582
Macro expansions are currently written to disk using the mangled name of
the macro. Do not use operators that only differ in case-sensitivity to
avoid issues on case-insensitive filesystems.
Resolves rdar://109371653.
The mangling of attached macro expansions based on the declaration to
which they are attached requires semantic information (specifically,
the interface type of that declaration) that caused cyclic
dependencies during type checking. Replace the mangling with a
less-complete mangling that only requires syntactic information from
the declaration, i.e., the name of the declaration to which the macro
was attached.
This eliminates reference cycles that occur with attached macros that
produce arbitrary names.
> LGTM (and you've saved me a [very small] job; I was going to make that change when I had a spare moment).
There was a discussion yesterday where we realized that this wasn't actually documented, so I figured a drive-by fix to documentation was within my abilities. 😇
Add a private discriminator to the mangling of an outermost-private `MacroExpansionDecl` so that declaration macros in different files won't have colliding macro expansion buffer names.
rdar://107462515
* [Executors][Distributed] custom executors for distributed actor
* harden ordering guarantees of synthesised fields
* the issue was that a non-default actor must implement the is remote check differently
* NonDefaultDistributedActor to complete support and remote flag handling
* invoke nonDefaultDistributedActorInitialize when necessary in SILGen
* refactor inline assertion into method
* cleanup
* [Executors][Distributed] Update module version for NonDefaultDistributedActor
* Minor docs cleanup
* we solved those fixme's
* add mangling test for non-def-dist-actor
Extend the name mangling scheme for macro expansions to cover attached
macros, and use that scheme for the names of macro expansions buffers.
Finishes rdar://104038303, stabilizing file/buffer names for macro
expansion buffers.
Use the name mangling scheme we've devised for macro expansions to
back the implementation of the macro expansion context's
`getUniqueName` operation. This way, we guarantee that the names
provided by macro expansions don't conflict, as well as making them
demangleable so we can determine what introduced the names.
- SILPackType carries whether the elements are stored directly
in the pack, which we're not currently using in the lowering,
but it's probably something we'll want in the final ABI.
Having this also makes it clear that we're doing the right
thing with substitution and element lowering. I also toyed
with making this a scalar type, which made it necessary in
various places, although eventually I pulled back to the
design where we always use packs as addresses.
- Pack boundaries are a core ABI concept, so the lowering has
to wrap parameter pack expansions up as packs. There are huge
unimplemented holes here where the abstraction pattern will
need to tell us how many elements to gather into the pack,
but a naive approach is good enough to get things off the
ground.
- Pack conventions are related to the existing parameter and
result conventions, but they're different on enough grounds
that they deserve to be separated.
