There was a weird corner case with nested generic functions that
would fail in the SIL verifier with some nonsense about archetypes
out of context.
Fix this the "right" way, by re-working Sema function declaration
validation to assign generic signatures in a more principled way.
Previously, nested functions did not get an interface type unless
they themselves had generic parameters.
This was inconsistent with methods nested inside generic types,
which did get an interface type even if they themselves did not
have a generic parameter list.
There's some spill-over in SILGen from this change. Mostly it
makes things more consistent and fixes some corner cases.
Now that we have ArchetypeBuilder::mapTypeOutOfContext(), we can
delete some tricky hand-crafted logic for getting the depth and
index of archetypes.
Notice that the depth of an archetype is now the same as generic
parameters, where depth 0 is the outermost generic context.
Previously it was backwards.
Mostly NFC, except that a few IDE crashers are now fixed because
of asserts firing in removed code, and also the change to depth
mangling (which I think makes sense, and it matches what's written
in docs/ABI.rst).
This is support for SE-0069: Mutability and Foundation Value Types.
In cases where someone has overridden a method that takes, e.g.
'NSURL', the override will no longer be valid, because the system
class will now use the value type 'URL' instead. If an override's
full name matches exactly, the compiler will offer fix-its for any
uses of reference types where value types are now preferred.
(This must be a direct match; subclasses, including the mutable
variants of many Foundation types, will need to be updated by hand.)
One wrinkle here is the use of generics. In Swift 2, Objective-C
generics weren't imported at all, so it's unlikely that the overriding
method will have the correct generic arguments. Simple migration
might insert the "bound" type, but it can't know what specific type
might be more appropriate. Therefore, the logic to add the fix-it
ignores generic arguments, assuming the parent's type is correct.
rdar://problem/26183575
This is a follow-up to the change that allowed one to omit @objc (or
the name in an @objc) when it can be inferred by matching a
requirement. There is no point in suggesting that one add @objc if it
will be inferred anyway, since it's just syntactic noise.
The fix for methods to lower the dynamic method type from the substituted AST type of the expression also needed to be applied to the optional chaining, subscript, and property paths.
This also exposed a problem in the Clang importer, where imported subscript accessors would get the unbound generic context type as their Self parameter type instead of the type with the correct generic parameters. Fix this by renaming the all-too-convenient ParamDecl::createSelf factory to `createUnboundSelf`, and introduce a new `createSelf` that uses the bound generic type.
Fixes rdar://problem/26447758.
The verifier now asserts that Throws, ThrowsLoc and isBodyThrowing()
match up.
Also, add /*Label=*/ comments where necessary to make the long argument
lists easier to read, and cleaned up some inconsistent naming conventions.
I caught a case where ClangImporter where we were passing in a loc as
StaticLoc instead of FuncLoc, but probably this didn't affect anything.
Previously, we would only reliably propagate conformances from new extensions to immediate subclasses, since when we visit grandchild classes, we'd see no change in the immediate base class's status. Fix this by walking up the entire superclass chain when we look for new inherited conformances, and track the last processed state of different nominal type decls' extensions separately. Fixes SR-1480.
Teach isClangTypeMoreIndirectThanSubstType about swift_newtype-ed
typedefs, which may be of CF foreign class type. In these cases, we
should reason about the underlying, wrapped type. Includes
refactoring of common logic and tests.
When an optional requirement of an @objc protocol has a selector that
collides with an entity that has a different *Swift* name but produces
an Objective-C method with the same selector, we have an existing
diagnostic complaining about the conflict. In such cases, make a few
suggestions (with Fix-Its) to improve the experience:
* Change Swift name to match the requirement, adding or modifying the
@objc as appropriate.
* Add "@nonobjc" to silence the diagnostic, explicitly opting out of
matching an @objc requirement.
This is intended to help with migration of Swift 2 code into Swift
3. The Swift 2 code will produce selectors that match Objective-C
methods in the protocol from Swift names that don't match; this helps
fix up those Swift names so that we now match.
Fixes the rest of rdar://problem/25159872. In some sense, it's a
stop-gap for more detailed checking of near-misses for optional
requirements, but it's not clear how wide-reaching such changes would
be.
When an optional requirement of an @objc protocol has a selector that
collides with an entity that has a different *Swift* name but produces
an Objective-C method with the same selector, we have an existing
diagnostic complaining about the conflict. In such cases, make a few
suggestions (with Fix-Its) to improve the experience:
* Change Swift name to match the requirement, adding or modifying the
@objc as appropriate.
* Add "@nonobjc" to silence the diagnostic, explicitly opting out of
matching an @objc requirement.
This is intended to help with migration of Swift 2 code into Swift
3. The Swift 2 code will produce selectors that match Objective-C
methods in the protocol from Swift names that don't match; this helps
fix up those Swift names so that we now match.
Fixes the rest of rdar://problem/25159872. In some sense, it's a
stop-gap for more detailed checking of near-misses for optional
requirements, but it's not clear how wide-reaching such changes would
be.
When a Clang-defined Objective-C class has the objc_runtime_visible
attribute, use objc_lookUpClass to get the Objective-C class object
rather than referencing the symbol directly. Also, ban subclassing of
Objective-C-runtime-visible classes as well as @objc on members of
extensions of such classes.
As a drive-by needed for this test, make
ClassDecl::getObjCRuntimeName() respect the Clang objc_runtime_name
attribute.
Fixes rdar://problem/25494454.
Fix an i32 vs. 64 issue in the IR matching for the IR generation test.
This reverts commit 09973e6956.
Fixes SR-1050, where @NSManaged subpatterns were not yet visited, and
thus still were deemed 'stored', by the time getStorage() was called
on the whole pattern. Change this to check the subpattern storage as
we go. Test case added.
We want to distinguish the special case of a library built with
-sil-serialize-all, from a SIL function that is [fragile] because
of an explicitly @_transparent or @inline(__always).
For now, NFC.
If a function is public, and either @_transparent or @inline(__always),
we need to make its body available for inlining in other resilience
domains. The more general concept here is an 'inlineable' function;
once the precise behaviors we want are nailed down, the set of AST
attributes for exposing this will likely change.
At the SIL level, inlineable functions are marked with the [fragile]
attribute. The SIL serializer only serializes [fragile] functions
unless -sil-serialize-all is passed in.
This patch fixes two problems in this area by consolidating some
duplicated logic:
1) Property accesses in Sema did not check for @inline(__always)
functions, or functions nested inside inlineable functions.
This manifested as IRGen crashes if an inlineable function
accessed a property of a resilient type.
2) In SILGen, functions nested inside [fragile] functions were
properly [fragile], but @inline(__always) was not taken into
account. This manifested as SIL serializer crashes where a
[fragile] function could reference a non-public, non-[fragile]
function.
This change is part of the series for building the standard library
without -sil-serialize-all.
This attribute is a stand-in for the versioning annotations
described in docs/LibraryEvolution.rst; right now it's just present
or absent, and its only effect is to make sure versioned internal
decls are treated as public at the SIL level. (This functionality
already existed for -enable-testing, so it can probably be trusted.)
Also, allow inlineable functions to reference transparent and
inline-always functions /if/ they're only called immediately (not used
as values or partial-applied), since they'll be inlined away before
emitting IR. (We should really only allow this /before/ mandatory
inlining, but we don't have a separate SIL stage for that.)
Let's say I am a good citizen and document my private symbols:
/** My TOP SECRET DOCUMENTATION */
private class Foo {
}
When I go to distribute the compiled binary, I find out my private
documentation is distributed as well:
$ swiftc test.swift -emit-module -module-name "test"
$ strings test.swiftdoc
My TOP SECRET DOCUMENTATION
/** My TOP SECRET DOCUMENTATION */
If a client can't use a symbol (e.g. it's private [or internal and not
-enable-testing]) don't emit the documentation for a symbol in the
swiftdoc.
Fixes: SR-762, rdar://21453624
The test coverage implements this truth table:
| visibility | -enable-testing | documentation? |
|------------|-----------------|----------------|
| private | no | ❌ |
| internal | no | ❌ |
| public | no | ✅ |
| private | yes | ❌ |
| internal | yes | ✅ |
| public | yes | ✅ |
Modified the existing comments test coverage to expect non-public
documentation not to be emitted.
Don't rely on existing comment structure
Refuse to emit comments if the decl cannot actually have one. To
accomplish this, we move `canHaveComment` into the Decl instance. It
must also be marked `const`, since one of its existing usages operates
on a const pointer.
Perform fewer checks when serializing the standard library.
This was added at some point to make 'import Foundation' faster in the REPL.
What we really care about though is not delaying synthesis of the rawValue
accessors (those are synthesized on demand anyway), but delaying the
conformance check to RawRepresentable.
Split up parsing of typealias and associatedtype, including dropping a
now unneeded ParseDeclOptions flag.
Then made typealias in a protocol valid, and act like you would
hope for protocol conformance purposes (i.e. as an alias possibly
involved in the types of other func/var conformances, not as a hidden
generic param in itself).
Also added support for simple type aliases in generic constraints. Aliases
to simple (non-sugared) archetype types (and also - trivially - aliases to
concrete types) can now be part of same-type constraints.
The strategy here is to add type aliases to the tree of
PotentialArchetypes, and if they are an alias to an archetype, also to
immediately find the real associated type and set it as the
representative for the PA. Thus the typealias PA node becomes just a
shortcut farther down into the tree for purposes of lookup and
generating same type requirements.
Then the typealias PA nodes need to be explicitly skipped when walking
the tree for building archetype types and other types of requirements,
in order to keep from getting extra out-of-order archetypes/witness
markers of the real associated type inserted where the typealias is
defined.
Any constraint with a typealias more complex than pointing to a single
nested associated type (e.g. `typealias T = A.B.C.D`), will now get a
specialized diagnoses.
If the resulting function type contains an ErrorType, this is an indicator that
something else is wrong. Bail out in this case.
This happened if an enum case was referenced inside the where-clause and treated
as a type.
Try to match the original spelling of static/class in diagnostics and
when printing the AST. Also fixes cases with
PrintOptions.PrintImplicitAttrs = false, where we would just print
'class', which was not valid code.
We had four duplicated implementations of checking how a protocol
requirement uses 'Self', all slightly wrong or incomplete:
- When deciding if the protocol type can be used as an existential.
This one would just ignore 'Self' in the return type of a method
completely, which was incorrect for cases where 'Self' is
contravariant but part of the return value, for example:
func foo() -> (Self -> ())
- When deciding if a member access can be performed on an existential
value. This is distinct from the former, because the member may
have been defined in a protocol extension, in which case it cannot
be used even if the protocol type can be used as an existential.
Unfortunately, this implementation was overly conservative, and
would reject uses of 'Self' where Sema could in fact erase the
existential type, for example:
func foo() -> Self??
func foo() -> Self.Type
func foo() -> (Self, Self)
This function handled function return types correctly, effectively
plugging the leak in the previous code. It did lead to inconsistent
behavior with protocols that had contravariant Self in requirements
though; sometimes we would diagnose uses of the existential type,
other times we would only complain about specific members.
- When deciding if a method in a non-final class can model a protocol
requirement. This one was the most elaborate one, but here
contravariance and uses of associated types are actually okay, so
it was written to pick up covariant 'Self' only. However, it also
did not handle metatypes and tuples.
- When opening the type of member of an existential, we would check
if the return value was 'Self' or an optional of 'Self', but again
this check was too conservative, so after the previous three were
fixed, we could reference members on existentials that did not
have a correct opened type.
Now, these have been combined into one check. To fix some crashes,
Sema's implementation of erasing existentials now relies on
coerceToType() instead of hand-rolling a few coercions of its own,
and wrapping the rest in CovariantFunctionConversionExpr, which
didn't make much sense if the result was not a function type.
SILGen still does not support function type conversions where an
existential return value is being erased; these would silently
miscompile before, but crash with an assertion now, because they
are correctly modeled as a FunctionConversionExpr, and not
CovariantFunctionConversionExpr.
