- If a @convention(block) function parameter was also marked @noescape, then during type-checking, we would accidentally propagate the convention directly onto a literal closure expr, instead of going through a function_conversion, which SILGen didn't handle. Fixes rdar://problem/23261912.
- If an Objective-C API declared a block parameter with a _Nonnull return of a bridged type, such as NSString *_Nonnull, then native-to-bridged thunking would fail to recognize this case, since we still bridge to an Optional type in the lowered ObjC interface. Fixes rdar://problem/23285766.
The @objc method argument bridging did the right thing but for
func to block thunks we didn't handle optionals and IUOs.
Symptoms included memory leaks because IRGen would later try to
retain the block by calling Block_copy() and discarding the result,
or memory corruption because the on-stack block could outlive
its stack frame.
Fixes <rdar://problem/22471309>.
Swift SVN r31882
Previously we would ignore inout when bridging, but now we need
to take it into account for Clang-generated accessors.
Note that @block_storage must be special cased, because we always
require @inout to be specified together with @block_storage, and
@inout @block_storage is not a pointer type to some underlying
type, but rather a special block pointer type that comes directly
from the Clang AST context.
Swift SVN r31778
These are contexts where we have enough information to bridge /back/
properly; that is, where we can distinguish CBool, ObjCBool, and
DarwinBoolean. In cases where we can't, we keep the three separate;
only CBool is really the same type as Bool.
This also affects current import behavior for ObjCBool, which was previously
incorrectly conflated with CBool in certain cases.
More rdar://problem/19013551
Swift SVN r30051
The other asserts do a lot of sanity checking of argument counting
already, so this assert doesn't appear to be necessary and causes
it to assert when you try to generate a zero-argument C function.
Swift SVN r27642
These aren't really orthogonal concerns--you'll never have a @thick @cc(objc_method), or an @objc_block @cc(witness_method)--and we have gross decision trees all over the codebase that try to hopscotch between the subset of combinations that make sense. Stop the madness by eliminating AbstractCC and folding its states into SILFunctionTypeRepresentation. This cleans up a ton of code across the compiler.
I couldn't quite eliminate AbstractCC's information from AST function types, since SIL type lowering transiently created AnyFunctionTypes with AbstractCCs set, even though these never occur at the source level. To accommodate type lowering, allow AnyFunctionType::ExtInfo to carry a SILFunctionTypeRepresentation, and arrange for the overlapping representations to share raw values.
In order to avoid disturbing test output, AST and SILFunctionTypes are still printed and parsed using the existing @thin/@thick/@objc_block and @cc() attributes, which is kind of gross, but lets me stage in the real source-breaking change separately.
Swift SVN r27095
The set of attributes that make sense at the AST level is increasingly divergent from those at the SIL level, so it doesn't really make sense for these to be the same. It'll also help prevent us from accidental unwanted propagation of attributes from the AST to SIL, which has caused bugs in the past. For staging purposes, start off with SILFunctionType's versions exactly the same as the FunctionType versions, which necessitates some ugly glue code but minimizes the potential disruption.
Swift SVN r27022
