Previously, a multi-pattern var/let decl like:
var x = 4, y = 17
would produce two pattern binding decls (one for x=4 one for y=17). This is convenient
in some ways, but is bad for source reproducibility from the ASTs (see, e.g. the improvements
in test/IDE/structure.swift and test/decl/inherit/initializer.swift).
The hardest part of this change was to get parseDeclVar to set up the AST in a way
compatible with our existing assumptions. I ended up with an approach that forms PBDs in
more erroneous cases than before. One downside of this is that we now produce a spurious
"type annotation missing in pattern"
diagnostic in some cases. I'll take care of that in a follow-on patch.
Swift SVN r26224
The deallocating parameter convention is a new convention put on a
non-trivial parameter if the caller function guarantees to the callee
that the parameter has the deallocating bit set in its object header.
This means that retains and releases do not need to be emitted on these
parameters even though they are non-trivial. This helps to solve a bug
in +0 self and makes it trivial for the optimizer to perform
optimizations based on this property.
It is not emitted yet by SILGen and will only be put on the self
argument of Deallocator functions.
Swift SVN r26179
- Rename getParentPattern() -> getParentPatternBinding(), since
it returns the pattern binding, not the pattern.
- Introduce new getParentPattern()/getParentInitializer() methods,
covering the most common uses of getParentPatternBinding().
NFC.
Swift SVN r26175
John points out that we would still need to evaluate default arguments in an ignored context, and these cases aren't important to fixing the bug.
Swift SVN r26108
For better consistency with other address-only instruction variants, and to open the door to new exciting existential representations (such as a refcounted boxed representation for ErrorType).
Swift SVN r25902
Turns out llvm::DataLayoutPass is used in other places, so the bots are still unhappy.
Re-applying the original change so we can fix the problem holistically.
Swift SVN r25761
This is breaking the testing bot because DataLayoutPass was just removed from LLVM trunk.
Chris is the best one to fix this change, but we need to get the bots green.
Swift SVN r25760
- Have Sema, not SILGen decide if a vardecl can be captured by address
instead of by-box. This is a non-local property that is best computed
during capture set formation. Sema captures this as a bit on the new
CapturedValue entry.
- Rework some diagnostic emission to centralize a class of noescape
diagnostics in capture set calculation. Previously, funcdecl closures
produced their diagnostics there, but ClosureExprs produced them in
MiscDiagnostics (NFC for this part).
This fixes <rdar://problem/19981118> Swift 1.2 beta 2: Closures nested in @noescape closures copy, rather than reference, captured vars.
Swift SVN r25759
when computing the list. This simplifies getLocalCaptures to *just* filter out
global captures, and paves the way for other enhancements. NFC.
Swift SVN r25739
...rather than just assuming any initializer without a body that makes it
to SILGen is a memberwise initializer.
In the long term we want SILGen to stop handling these initializers, at
which point we can see if it makes sense to remove this body kind.
No intended functionality change.
Swift SVN r25723
If we have a C function pointer conversion, generate a thunk using the same logic we use for ObjC method thunks, and emit a pointer to that thunk as the C function pointer value. (This works for nongeneric, nonmember functions; generics will additionally need to apply generic parameters within the thunks. Static functions would need to gather the metatype as well.)
Swift SVN r25653
If a non-static 'let' field in a struct has an initializer, its implicitly generated
memberwise initializer should not override that. Handle this by having the memberwise initializer
and default initializer use the initial value of the property instead of an argument to the init.
This would have been a lot easier if sema was synthesizing the ctor bodies instead of SILGen,
but here it is. The missing case is narrow (let (x,y) = (1,2)) and for now we just disable
implicit synthesization of the incorrect case.
Swift SVN r25424
This is also useful in general SIL passes when generating thunks. I am going to
use this in function signature optimization and closure specialization.
Swift SVN r25356
This adds the -profile-generate flag, which enables LLVM's
instrumentation based profiling. It implements the instrumentation
for basic control flow, such as if statements, loops, and closures.
Swift SVN r25155
If a grandchild class inherits a thunked override from the child class, use that thunk in the grandchild vtable too. Should round out the fix for rdar://problem/19321484.
Swift SVN r24735
the call instead of during the formal evaluation of the argument.
This is the last major chunk of the semantic changes proposed
in the accessors document. It has two purposes, both related
to the fact that it shortens the duration of the formal access.
First, the change isolates later evaluations (as long as they
precede the call) from the formal access, preventing them from
spuriously seeing unspecified behavior. For example::
foo(&array[0], bar(array))
Here the value passed to bar is a proper copy of 'array',
and if bar() decides to stash it aside, any modifications
to 'array[0]' made by foo() will not spontaneously appear
in the copy. (In contrast, if something caused a copy of
'array' during foo()'s execution, that copy would violate
our formal access rules and would therefore be allowed to
have an arbitrary value at index 0.)
Second, when a mutating access uses a pinning addressor, the
change limits the amount of arbitrary code that falls between
the pin and unpin. For example::
array[0] += countNodes(subtree)
Previously, we would begin the access to array[0] before the
call to countNodes(). To eliminate the pin and unpin, the
optimizer would have needed to prove that countNodes didn't
access the same array. With this change, the call is evaluated
first, and the access instead begins immediately before the call
to +=. Since that operator is easily inlined, it becomes
straightforward to eliminate the pin/unpin.
A number of other changes got bundled up with this in ways that
are hard to tease apart. In particular:
- RValueSource is now ArgumentSource and can now store LValues.
- It is now illegal to use emitRValue to emit an l-value.
- Call argument emission is now smart enough to emit tuple
shuffles itself, applying abstraction patterns in reverse
through the shuffle. It also evaluates varargs elements
directly into the array.
- AllowPlusZero has been split in two. AllowImmediatePlusZero
is useful when you are going to immediately consume the value;
this is good enough to avoid copies/retains when reading a 'var'.
AllowGuaranteedPlusZero is useful when you need a stronger
guarantee, e.g. when arbitrary code might intervene between
evaluation and use; it's still good enough to avoid copies
from a 'let'. The upshot is that we're now a lot smarter
about generally avoiding retains on lets, but we've also
gotten properly paranoid about calling non-mutating methods
on vars.
(Note that you can't necessarily avoid a copy when passing
something in a var to an @in_guaranteed parameter! You
first have to prove that nothing can assign to the var during
the call. That should be easy as long as the var hasn't
escaped, but that does need to be proven first, so we can't
do it in SILGen.)
Swift SVN r24709
If a subclass overrides methods with variance in the optionality of non-class-type members, emit a thunk to handle wrapping more optional parameters or results and force-unwrapping any IUO parameters made non-optional in the derived. For this to be useful, we need IRGen to finally pay attention to SILVTables, but this is a step on the way to fixing rdar://problem/19321484.
Swift SVN r24705
Fixes a crash where we tried to natively vtable dispatch these methods, even when they were in extensions, causing the crash in rdar://problem/18088026.
Swift SVN r24619
Rather than keeping just a "main class" in every module, track the "main file"
that's responsible for producing the module's entry point. This covers both
main source files and files containing classes marked @UIApplicationMain or
@NSApplicationMain.
This should have no functionality change, but is preparation for the next
commit, where we will preserve some of this information in serialization.
Swift SVN r24529
a non-native owner. This is required by Slice, which
will use an ObjC immutable array object as the owner
as long as all the elements are contiguous.
As part of this, I decided it was best to encode the
native requirement in the accessor names. This makes
some of these accessors really long; we can revisit this
if we productize this feature.
Note that pinning addressors still require a native
owner, since pinning as a feature is specific to swift
refcounting.
Swift SVN r24420
We need this in order to unpin at the correct moment.
Add an assertion that there's a scope active when pushing
an unpin writeback, as well as an assertion to ensure that
we never finish a function with writebacks active.
Swift SVN r24411
Change all the existing addressors to the unsafe variant.
Update the addressor mangling to include the variant.
The addressor and mutable-addressor may be any of the
variants, independent of the choice for the other.
SILGen and code synthesis for the new variants is still
untested.
Swift SVN r24387
clients of CaptureKind by having getDeclCaptureKind map address-only lets onto
Box or NoEscape, instead of having all the clients do it.
Swift SVN r24136
- Introduce a new 'noescape' CaptureKind and have getDeclCaptureKind()
use it for by-address captures in noescape closures.
- Lower NoEscape captures to a simple inout pointer instead of to a
pointer + refcount.
This includes a test of the SILGen produced code itself along with an
integration test that shows that this enables inout deshadowing to remove
shadows that would otherwise have to be preserved due to closures capturing
them.
This can be more aggressive for address-only let constants, but that will
wait for a follow-up patch.
Swift SVN r24135
SILGen was emitting extraneous retains/releases on self when accessing let
properties in a class, leading to bogus diagnostics. Fixing this just
amounted to realizing that emitDirectIVarLValue is already safe w.r.t. +0
bases.
Swift SVN r23975
"isConstant" distinction. This was an irritating bit of redundant state
that was making the code more complicated. Clients of VarLoc really only
care about "has address" and "has box", not whether the VarLoc came from
a let or var (and if they did, they can ask the VarDecl directly). NFC,
just more "yak shaving" as Doug likes to say.
Swift SVN r23869
isn't used yet, but will be for modeling the self argument passed to an
address-only witness implementation. NFC since all this code is dead :-)
Swift SVN r23857
Using the intrinsics is obnoxious because I needed them
to return Builtin.NativeObject?, but there's no reasonable
way to safely generate optional types from Builtins.cpp.
Ugh.
Dave and I also decided that there's no need for
swift_tryPin to allow a null object.
Swift SVN r23824
them in a more consistent and principled way. Two changes here: MUI is generated
when a vardecl is emitted, not as a separate "MarkPatternUninitialized" pass. Second,
when generating a MUI for self parameters with a temporary alloc_stack (due to the
possibility of superclass remapping of self) emit the MUI on the allocation itself,
not on the incoming argument. This is a lot more consistent (dissolving a bunch of
hacks in DI).
In terms of behavior changes, this only changes the raw sil generated by SILGen and
consumed by DI, so there is no user-visible change. This simply unblocks future work.
Swift SVN r23823
a capture list hung off the CaptureExpr it was associated with. This made
sense lexically (since a capture list is nested inside of the closure) but
not semantically. Semantically, the capture list initializers are evaluated
outside the closure, the variables are bound to those values, then the closure
captures the newly bound values.
To directly represent this, represent captures with a new CaptureListExpr node,
which contains the ClosureExpr inside of it. This correctly models the semantic
relationship, and makes sure that AST walkers all process the initializers of the
capture list as being *outside* of the closure.
This fixes rdar://19146761 and probably others.
Swift SVN r23756
Add the following functionality to the Swift compiler:
* covariant subtyping of Set
* upcasting, downcasting of Set
* automatic bridging between Set and NSSet, including
* NSSet params/return values in ObjC are imported as Set<NSObject>
* Set params/return values in Swift are visible to ObjC as NSSet
<rdar://problem/18853078> Implement Set<T> up and downcasting
Swift SVN r23751
