When you have a type that's ambiguous because it's defined in 2 imported
modules, but you don't have to disambiguate by using the module name,
previously no index references were produced. Now most are for the
common case, but notably nested type constructors and generics still
aren't emitted, partially because of https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/65726
Fixes: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/64598
This source location will be used to determine whether to add a name lookup
option to exclude macro expansions when the name lookup request is constructed.
Currently, the source location argument is unused.
In `SourceLookupCache::lookupVisibleDecls`, copy the top level values before iterating them.
If we have 'addinitstotoplevel' enabled, calling 'addConstructorCallsForType' can cause macros to get expanded, which can then cause new members ot get added to 'TopLevelValues', invalidating the current iterator.
I have not been able to reduce this to a test case that doesn’t rely on the `Observation` module in the SDK but here is the test case with which I was able to reproduce the issue very reliably.
```swift
import Foundation
import Observation
@Observable class MyObject {}
extension MyObject {}
// RUN: ~/sbin/sourcekitd-test \
// RUN: -req=complete.open \
// RUN: -req-opts=addinitstotoplevel=1 \
// RUN: -pos=8:1 \
// RUN: %s \
// RUN: -- \
// RUN: %s \
// RUN: -Xfrontend \
// RUN: -load-plugin-library \
// RUN: -Xfrontend \
// RUN: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/swift/host/plugins/libObservationMacros.dylib \
// RUN: -sdk \
// RUN: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX14.0.sdk
```
rdar://109202157
Expand macros in the specified source file syntactically (without any
module imports, nor typechecking).
Request would look like:
```
{
key.compilerargs: [...]
key.sourcefile: <file name>
key.sourcetext: <source text> (optional)
key.expansions: [<expansion specifier>...]
}
```
`key.compilerargs` are used for getting plugins search paths. If
`key.sourcetext` is not specified, it's loaded from the file system.
Each `<expansion sepecifier>` is
```
{
key.offset: <offset>
key.modulename: <plugin module name>
key.typename: <macro typename>
key.macro_roles: [<macro role UID>...]
}
```
Clients have to provide the module and type names because that's
semantic.
Response is a `CategorizedEdits` just like (semantic) "ExpandMacro"
refactoring. But without `key.buffer_name`. Nested expnasions are not
supported at this point.
Previously we would wait until CSApply, which
would trigger their type-checking in
`coercePatternToType`. This caused a number of
bugs, and hampered solver-based completion, which
does not run CSApply. Instead, form a conjunction
of all the ExprPatterns present, which preserves
some of the previous isolation behavior (though
does not provide complete isolation).
We can then modify `coercePatternToType` to accept
a closure, which allows the solver to take over
rewriting the ExprPatterns it has already solved.
This then sets the stage for the complete removal
of `coercePatternToType`, and doing all pattern
type-checking in the solver.
Whe completing in parameter packs, we were calling `getParameterAt` with `Res.FuncDeclRef`. But the substitution map in `Res.FuncDeclRef` contained type variables that were allocated in the constraint system’s arena. And that arena had been freed when we call this from `deliverResults`.
The fix is to compute the optional parameters in advance in `sawSolutionImpl`
rdar://109093909
Previously in the case of a constructor like `A<Int>(value: 1)`
`Fn->getLoc()` returned the location of `>(value: 1)` while the actual
location we're looking for is correctly the start of `A<Int>(value: 1)`.
This adjusts the location we're looking up to use the start location of
the constructor instead.
Fixes: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/54532
We previously asserted that for a call the function type had the same number of parameters as the declaration. But that’s not true for parameter packs anymore because the parameter pack will be exploded in the function type to account for passing multiple arguments to the pack.
To fix this, use `ConcreteDeclRef` instead of a `ValueDecl`, which has a substitution map and is able to account for the exploded parameter packs when accessed using `getParameterAt`.
rdar://100066716
Showing the type annotation only makes sense if they are not `Void`. That’s consistent with functions where we also don’t show a `Void` return type. Most importantly, we shouldn’t be showing a `Void` type annotation for attached macros.
rdar://108870970
We need to teach code completion how to invoke the type checker for attached macro attributes. After that, everything started working.
rdar://105232015
When completing after `names:`, completion should offer the different ways you can specify the names, i.e. `arbitrary`, `named`, etc.
```
@freestanding(declaration, names: #^COMPLETE^#)
```
rdar://108535077
It doesn't seem like there's any client that's
actually taking advantage of setting it to `false`,
and its default value of `false` is more likely
than not going to cause clients to accidentally
miss comments that they may want. In fact, this
was exactly the case for code completion's brief
field. Finally, the parameter wasn't even
consistently applied, as we would attempt to
deserialize swiftdoc comments even if it were
`false`.
inside closures while type checking a macro expansion.
PreCheckExpr, ConstraintGenerator, and other walkers do not walk into macro
expansions. However, the implementation of this macro walking behavior in
ASTWalker would skip any declaration that appears inside any macro expansion
buffer. This is incorrect for cases where the parent is in the same macro
expansion buffer, because the local declaration is not inside a new macro
expansion. This caused bogus errors when type checking expanded macro expressions
containing closures with local declarations, because pre-check and constraint
generation mistakenly skipped local pattern bindings.
When getTopLevelDeclsForDisplay is called on an imported module, it may
lists non-public decls. If we they try to inject the conformance on
Sendable on internal types, the compiler may crash on failing to
deserialize internal details. As a fix, let's only inject the
conformance on public or package types.
rdar://95430471
for checking duplicated results from multiple type checker solutions.
e.g.
protocol Proto {}
struct Generic<T> {
func retProto() -> some Proto
}
func foo() -> Generic<T1>
func foo() -> Generic<T2>
foo().<COMPLETION>
The return type of `Geric<T1>.retProto()` and `Geric<T2>.retProto()` is
different, but they both spelled 'some Proto'. So IDE consumers don't
care the difference.
rdar://107669173
31dee1ce1c refactored the completion
filter, accidentally dropping initializers when found from the cache.
Add these back in and also modify the existing test to load from the
cache as well.
Resolves rdar://107807707.
Only return macros that are valid in their current position, ie. an
attached macro is not valid on a nominal.
Also return freestanding expression macros in code block item position
and handle the new freestanding code item macros.
Resolves rdar://105563583.
`updateNonUserModule` was accidentally copying `SearchPathOptions`. Take
a reference to it instead. Also, since `addFile` is actually called many
times (once for every submodule, of which there are many), change
`isNonUserModule` to a request so that it's only calculated when needed.
Resolves rdar://107155587.
This hooks up the cursor info infrastructure to be able to pass through multiple, ambiguous results. There are still minor issues that cause solver-based cursor info to not actually report the ambiguous results but those will be fixed in a follow-up PR.
