The `@MainActor` global actor constraint on a declaration does not carry an
inherent ABI impact and therefore use of this constraint should not be limited
to OS versions where Swift concurrency is available.
Resolves rdar://105610970
It shares many of the same values as OpenBSD (which both inherited from 4.4BSD),
and we wouldn't expect those to diverge due to the respective platforms'
bincompat goals.
Previously, when creating availability attributes for synthesized declarations
we would identify some set of reference declarations that the synthesized
declaration should be as-available-as. The availability attributes of the
reference declarations would then be merged together to create the attributes
for the synthesized declaration. The problem with this approach is that the
reference declarations themselves may implicitly inherit availability from their
enclosing scopes, so the resulting merged attributes could be incomplete. The
fix is to walk though the enclosing scopes of the reference declarations,
merging the availability attributes found at each level.
Additionally, the merging algorithm that produces inferred availability
attributes failed to deal with conflicts between platform specific and platform
agnostic availability. Now the merging algorithm notices when platform agnostic
availability should take precedence and avoids generating conflicting platform
specific attributes.
Resolves rdar://106575142
For very large control flow graphs the markControllingTerminatorsLive can stack overflow.
Fix this by doing the work iteratively instead of recursively.
rdar://106198943
Current logic attempts simplification of the base type only if it's
a type variable or a dependent member type. That's valid for correct
code but not for invalid code e.g. `(($T) -> Void).Element` is not
going to be simplified even if `$T` is bound, which causes crashes
in diagnostic mode because `matchTypes` is going to re-introduce
constraint with partially resolved dependent member types and by
doing so make it stale forever which trips constraint system state
verification logic.
Resolves: rdar://105149979
The `isEscaping` function is called a lot from ARCSequenceOpt and ReleaseHoisting.
To avoid quadratic complexity for large functions, limit the amount of work what the EscapeUtils are allowed to to.
This keeps the complexity linear.
The arbitrary limit is good enough for almost all functions.
It lets the EscapeUtils do several hundred up/down walks which is much more than needed in most cases.
Fixes a compiler hang
https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/63846
rdar://105795976
The feature "reflection" was already used in the tests (enabled with
SWIFT_ENABLE_REFLECTION). The new feature tests were triggered even if
the experimental feature was not enabled in people builds.
Change the spelling to "reflection_runtime" to not clash with the
existing feature. Change all the tests I found added lately that has the
existing spelling.
This is a wild guess at what might be causing our persistent, random
String failures on the main branch:
```
Swift(macosx-x86_64) :: Prototypes/CollectionTransformers.swift
Swift(macosx-x86_64) :: stdlib/NSSlowString.swift
Swift(macosx-x86_64) :: stdlib/NSStringAPI.swift
Swift(macosx-x86_64) :: stdlib/StringIndex.swift
Swift-validation(macosx-x86_64) :: stdlib/String.swift
Swift-validation(macosx-x86_64) :: stdlib/StringBreadcrumbs.swift
Swift-validation(macosx-x86_64) :: stdlib/StringUTF8.swift
```
FWIW, it appears this is *not* caused by https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/62717:
that change has also landed on release/5.8, and I haven’t seen these
issues on that branch.
Our atomic breadcrumbs initialization vs its non-atomic loading
gives me an uneasy feeling that this may in fact be a long standing
synchronization issue that is only now causing problems (for whatever
reason). I am unable to reproduce these issues locally, so this guess
may be (and probably is) wildly off the mark, but this PR is likely
to be a good idea anyway, if only to rule out this possibility.
rdar://104751936
It's possible for out-of-scope type variable to be the type of
declaration if such declaration is recursively referenced in
the body of a closure located in its initializer expression.
In such cases type of the variable declaration cannot be connected
to the closure because its not known in advance (determined by the
initializer itself).
Resolves: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/63455
