We were always returning true from those functions in SKEditorConsumer
and false in the test consumers. On the client side we would then ignore
the return value. So it's clearer to have the functions not return
anything.
The recommended way forward is to use the SyntaxClassifier on the Swift
side.
By removing the C++ SyntaxClassifier, we can also eliminate the
-force-libsyntax-based-processing option that was used to bootstrap
incremental parsing and would generate the syntax map from a syntax
tree.
If enabled using the environment variable
SOURCEKIT_INCREMENTAL_PARSE_VALIDATION, the incrementally parsed syntax
tree will be compared to the from-scratch parsing syntax tree. If they
differ a warning is emitted and log files showing the difference written
to a temporary directory.
Since compiler arguments are processed by Driver, arbitrary filename
passed as 'request.name' (e.g. "", "-1", etc.) may cause problems.
Using '-' guarantees successful initialization of 'CompilerInvocation'.
rdar://problem/40646921
rdar://problem/40955808
With more options coming for incremental syntax parsing, the list of
arguments will grow way to large and unhandy, so just extract them into
one common struct.
Validation of the input side of FunctionTypeRepr was previously being done in Sema because of expression folding. If we instead push the invariant that the input TypeRepr should always be a TupleTypeRepr into the AST a number of nice cleanups fall out:
- The SIL Parser no longer accepts Swift 2-style type declarations
- Parse is more cleanly able to reject invalid FunctionTypeReprs
- Clients of the AST can be assured the input type is always a TupleType so we can flush Swift 2 hacks
This code was an experiment in how to collect information after a crash,
that did not end up being used. It's unclear how much it has bitrotted
at this point, since it has no tests and was not designed with automated
testing in mind. Parts of it interfere with some changes I want to make
to the underlying tracing mechanism, so I am finally removing it. This
also lets us remove the buffer copying in the parts of tracing used by
the compile notifications, improving performance.
For rdar://39538847
Stop filtering out diagnostics with invalid locations in the editor
diagnostic consumer, and instead capture them separately so that we can
include them in did-compile notifications.
rdar://39225000
The only interesting change here is that I stopped filtering out
non-note diagnostics from outside the "inputs". This matches better how
code-completion gets inputs, and shouldn't hurt anything else since only
the tracing code will look at diagnostics that aren't in specific
buffers anyway.
rdar://38438512
When enabled, send a notification before/after every "compilation",
which for now means `performSema`. This piggy-backs and modifies some
existing code that we had for "tracing" operations in sourcekitd that
unfortunately was untested. At least now some of the basic parts are
tested via the new notifications.
Part of rdar://38438512
This is how it was used in all but one place anyway, and makes it easier
to understand. It also aligns better with some further refactoring I
want to do...
Before this patch, we have one flag (KeepSyntaxInfo) to turn on two syntax
functionalities of parser: (1) collecting parsed tokens for coloring and
(2) building syntax trees. Since sourcekitd is the only consumer of either of these
functionalities, sourcekitd by default always enables such flag.
However, empirical results show (2) is both heavier and less-frequently
needed than (1). Therefore, separating the flag to two flags makes more
sense, where CollectParsedToken controls (1) and BuildSyntaxTree
controls (2).
CollectingParsedToken is always enabled by sourcekitd because
formatting and syntax-coloring need it; however BuildSyntaxTree should
be explicitly switched on by sourcekitd clients.
resolves: rdar://problem/37483076
Stop parsing frontend arguments directly and use the driver instead. The
most intersting part of this change is that it forces us to consider
whether our compiler invocation will have inputs or not. We have
several kinds of requests that need to create a compiler instance, but
not parse any inputs (interface-generation, doc-info, and indexing when
operating on a module instead of source files).
Incidentally, add an error when trying to do doc-info on multiple source
files. This was already very broken (assertion failures and bogus source
locations), so add an error for it.
rdar://problem/17897287
The enhanced SourceKitd requests are EditorOpen and EdtiorReplaceText. In these two requests, the clients can specify a flag "key. enablesyntaxtree = 1" to get a serialize libSyntax tree with the response.
To help this integration, we added a function in SyntaxParsingContext to explicitly finalize the creation of a SourceFileSyntax to incorporate the fact that SourceKit needs the tree before its destroying the parser instance.
To test this integration, we diff the syntax tree serialized from the frontend action and the tree serialized from a SourceKitd response. They should be identical.
When expanding placeholders, we analyze the surrounding context of a
placeholder to decide whether to expand the placeholder to a trailing
closure. This analysis assumes CallExpr is the only AST node with argument;
however UnresolvedMemberExpr can have argument as well. This commit
teaches the analysis logic to handle both.
This allows reporting successful and unsuccessful optimizations similar to
clang/llvm.
This first patch adds support for the
options -Rpass=<pass-name-regex> -Rpass-missed=<pass-name-regex>. These allow
reporting successful/unsuccessful optimization on the compiler output for passes
specified by the regex. I've also added one missed and one passed remark type
to the inliner to test the infrastructure.
Clang also has the option of collecting these records in an external YAML data
file. This will be added in a later patch.
A few notes:
* The goal is to use this facility for both user-lever "performance" warnings
and expert-level performance analysis. There will probably be a flag in the
future differentiating the verbosity.
* The intent is match clang/llvm as much as it makes sense. On the other hand I
did make some changes. Unlike in llvm, the emitter is not a pass which
simplifies things. Also the remark class hierarchy is greatly simplified since
we don't derive from DiagnosticInfo. We also don't derive from Diagnostic to
support the streaming API for arbitrary named-value pairs.
* Currently function names are printed mangled which should be fixed.
... and add a few basic statistics about the number of requests, ASTs
built, etc. The Statistic type is loosely based on the one from LLVM,
but suitable for using without DEBUG macros and using SourceKit UIdents
to identify the statistic. The easiest way to add a new statistic is to
add it to SwiftStatistics.def in the SwiftLangSupport.
After modifying a file, don't rebuild the ASTs for every file that
(might) depend on it. This is very expensive if there are a lot of open
documents and we don't yet provide a way for clients to distinguish
documents that they want to update from any other documents that e.g.
are just open because they haven't been saved yet.
rdar://problem/34415818
If an edit didn't intersect with an existing highlighted tokens but caused a
later highlighted token to change kind, syntax highlighting would be lost
between the edit and that token.
Resolves rdar://problem/33463141.
We still need to adjust the affected range to the line boundaries and return all
tokens on the line when there are no new tokens, as the client will clear all
tokens on that line in its copy of the syntax map leaving the other tokens
unhighlighted. We also need to extend the affected range to include the ranges
of the mismatched tokens from the previous syntaxmap, so their highlighting will
be cleared.
Also add more comments to better document the new syntax map structure and
behaviour.
This patch changes the syntax map data structure it uses to be offset based
rather than line/col based in order to avoid calling getLineAndColumn for the
start and end offset of every token. This removes the 30% of time spent in
getLineAndColumn for this request in large files (rdar://problem/28965123).
The logic for returning the affected range and the token ranges to highlight
following an edit also made several assumptions that no longer hold. This
patch changes it to compare the syntax maps from before and after the edit,
find the first mismtaching tokens from the start and end of the syntax maps
and return the tokens in that range (adjusted to line boundaries). This fixes
syntax highlighting issues with interpolated multi-line strings
(rdar://problem/32148117) and block comments.
With the above changes the per-keystroke time spent for syntax highlighting
(with sematic info disabled) dropped from ~80ms to just under 50ms for a
12KLOC file.
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
This commit changes the 'Accessibility' enum to be named 'AccessLevel'.
