Add @concurrent to SIL function types, mirroring what's available on
AST function types. @concurrent function types will have by-value
capture semantics.
Introduce `@concurrent` attribute on function types, including:
* Parsing as a type attribute
* (De-/re-/)mangling for concurrent function types
* Implicit conversion from @concurrent to non-@concurrent
- (De-)serialization for concurrent function types
- AST printing and dumping support
Bridging an async Swift method back to an ObjC completion-handler-based API requires
that the ObjC thunk spawn a task on which to execute the Swift async API and pass
its results back on to the completion handler.
An asyncHandler function is split into two functions:
1. The asyncHandler body function: it contains the body of the function, but is emitted as an async function.
2. The original function: it just contains
_runAsyncHandler(operation: asyncHandlerBodyFunction)
rdar://problem/71247879
This patch includes a large number of changes to make sure that:
1. When ExtInfo values are created, we store a ClangTypeInfo if applicable.
2. We reduce dependence on storing SIL representations in ASTExtInfo values.
3. Reduce places where we sloppily create ASTExtInfo values which should
store a Clang type but don't. In certain places, this is unavoidable;
see [NOTE: ExtInfo-Clang-type-invariant].
Ideally, we would check that the appropriate SILExtInfo does always store
a ClangTypeInfo. However, the presence of the HasClangFunctionTypes option
means that we would need to condition that assertion based on a dynamic check.
Plumbing the setting down to SILExtInfoBuilder's checkInvariants would be too
much work. So we weaken the check for now; we should strengthen it once we
"turn on" HasClangFunctionTypes and remove the dynamic feature switch.
Closurea can become 'async' in one of two ways:
* They can be explicitly marked 'async' prior to the 'in'
* They can be inferred as 'async' if they include 'await' in the body
In the future, we will remove the UseClangFunctionTypes language option, but we
temporarily need the scaffolding for equality checks to be consistent in all
places.
Since the two ExtInfos share a common ClangTypeInfo, and C++ doesn't let us
forward declare nested classes, we need to hoist out AnyFunctionType::ExtInfo
and SILFunctionType::ExtInfo to the top-level.
We also add some convenience APIs on (AST|SIL)ExtInfo for frequently used
withXYZ methods. Note that all non-default construction still goes through the
builder's build() method.
We do not add any checks for invariants here; those will be added later.
