rdar://problem/21663830
Add the following new requirements to SequenceType with default implementations:
- dropFirst(n)
- dropLast(n)
- prefix(n)
- suffix(n)
- split(n)
In addition, provide specialized default implementations of these for CollectionTypes with forward, bidirectional, and random-access Index types where possible.
Add the following new requirements to CollectionType with default implementations:
- prefixThrough(n)
- prefixUpTo(n)
- suffixFrom(n)
- split() // isSeparator closure
Add the following convenience APIs:
- dropFirst() -> calls dropFirst(1)
- dropLast() -> calls dropLast(1)
Add a tentative underscored API:
- split() // takes Equatable separator.
Some APIs have undefined behavior when creating slices where the endpoints go beyond the bounds of the underlying collection. This will be fixed later by trapping creation of slices with invalid indices (rdar://problem/21822657).
Swift SVN r30371
This came out of today's language review meeting.
The intent is to match #available with the attribute
that describes availability.
This is a divergence from Objective-C.
Swift SVN r28484
<rdar://20494686>
String itsef should only expose Unicode-correct algorithms, like proper
substring/prefix/suffix search, enumerating words/lines/paragraphs, case
folding etc. Promoting sequence-centric algorithms to methods on String
is not acceptable since it invites users to write wrong code. Thus,
String has to lose its SequenceType conformance.
Nevertheless, we recognize that sometimes it is useful to manipulate the
String contents on lower levels (UTF-8, UTF-16, Unicode scalars,
extended grapheme clusters), for example, when implementing high-level
Unicode operations, so we can't remove low-level operations
altogether. For this reason, String provides nested "views" for the
first three low-level representations, but grapheme clusters were in a
privileged position -- String itself is a collection of grapheme
clusters. We propose to add a characters view that will represent the
String as a collection of Character values.
Swift SVN r28065
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
"similar", avoiding false positive "not exhaustive" diagnostics on switches
like:
switch ... {
case let x?: break
case .None: break
}
Also, start using x? patterns in the stdlib more (review appreciated!), which
is what shook this issue out.
Swift SVN r26004
The standard library has grown significantly, and we need a new
directory structure that clearly reflects the role of the APIs, and
allows future growth.
See stdlib/{public,internal,private}/README.txt for more information.
Swift SVN r25876
