There are two axes on which a saved frontend flag can be categorized for
printing in a `.swiftinterface` file:
1. Whether the flag is "ignorable" or not.
2. Which levels of interface the flag should be in (public, package).
This refactor ensures that those two axes are modeled independently and
prepares the infrastructure to allow flags to appear in the private and package
interfaces without being included in the public interface.
Having package-name flag in non-package interfaces causes them to be built as if
belonging to a package, which causes an issue for a loading client outside of the
package as follows.
For example, when building X that depends on A with the following dependency chain:
X --> A --> B --(package-only)--> C
1. X itself is not in the same package as A, B, and C.
2. When dependency scanning X, and opening up B, because the scan target is in a
different package domain, the scanner decides that B's package-only dependency
on C is to be ignored.
3. When then finally building A itself, it will load its dependencies, but because
the .private.swiftinterface of A still specifies -package-name, when it loads
B, it will then examine its dependencies and deem that this package-only dependency
on C is required.
Because (2) and (3) disagree, we get an error now when building the private A textual interface.
rdar://130701866
Add a new flag to enable package interface loading.
Use the last value of package-name in case of dupes.
Rename PrintInterfaceContentMode as InterfaceMode.
Update diagnostics.
Test package interface loading with various scenarios.
Test duplicate package-name.
It has an extension .package.swiftinterface and contains package decls
as well as SPIs and public/inlinable decls. When a module is loaded
from interface, it now looks up the package-name in the interface
and checks if the importer is in the same package. If so, it uses
that package interface found to load the module. If not, uses the existing
logic to load modules.
Resolves rdar://104617854
When performing an implicit module build, the frontend was prepending
`-target-min-inlining-target target` to the command line. This was overriding
the implicit `-target-min-inlining-target min` argument that is implied when
`-library-level api` is specified. As a result, the wrong overload could be
picked when compiling the body of an inlinable function to SIL for emission
into the client, potentially resulting in crashes when the client of the module
is back deployed to an older OS.
Resolves rdar://109336472
Ambiguities are introduced in generated swiftinterfaces when a type
shares a name with a module (i.e. XCTest). This workaround uses the
module-alias feature to avoid these ambiguities. Writing module
references with a distinguishable prefix should allow normal
type-checking to avoid the usual ambiguities.
We should still aim for a proper fully-qualified named syntax, but this
may help in the mean time.
rdar://101969500
Titled as "// swift-module-flags-ignorable:", this new field contains new
frontend arguments that can be safely ignored by the older version of the compiler.
For compilers that don't know the field at all, all arguments in it are ignored.
rdar://78233352
Print implementation-only imports in the private textual interface
only if also importing SPI. This allows to export types from
implementation-only imports in SPI and brings the private textual
interfaces in line with the binary interfaces.
This is a temporary solution as we need to better design the language
feature around this.
This feature requires passing -experimental-spi-imports to the frontend
that generates the private swiftinterface file.
We have landed support for serialization Clang function types, but there is
still work to be done here.
Moreover, we should use a consistent style with `[(FIXME|TODO|NOTE): label]`,
instead of using different styles throughout the code.
Currently, when a swiftinterface file fails to load, we emit the specific diagnostics for the failures, followed by a generic “failed to load module ‘Foo’” message. This PR improves that final diagnostic, particularly when the cause may be that the interface was emitted by a newer compiler using backwards-incompatible syntax.
This reverts commit e805fe486e, which reverted
the change earlier. The problem was caused due to a simultaneous change to some
code by the PR with parsing and printing for Clang function types (#28737)
and the PR which introduced Located<T> (#28643).
This commit also includes a small change to make sure the intersecting region
is fixed: the change is limited to using the fields of Located<T> in the
`tryParseClangType` lambda.
