Use `preCheckTarget` to pre-check the body,
allowing us to replace `PreCheckResultBuilderRequest`
with a request that only checks the brace for
ReturnStmts.
Previously we would skip any expression in a
result builder that didn't contain the completion
token, but that would cause issues if e.g the
result builder was needed to infer the type of a
variable that we're completing on. Instead, only
skip expressions in a result builder if the
completion token is in the same builder and the
expression itself doesn't contain the completion.
rdar://127154780
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
`getLoc` does not necesarrily return the start location of the location (e.g. for `a.b().c()` it returns the location of `c` because that’s the location of the call). But we used the location from `getLoc` as the start location of the synthesized `buildExpression` call. In the added test case, this means that the `buildExpression` call only contained `everlay() {}` and not the code completion token. We thus infered that we could skip it the entire `MyStack {}.pnTabGesture {}.everlay() {}` call for code completion, which isn’t correct.
rdar://120798355
These allow multi-statement `if`/`switch` expression
branches that can produce a value at the end by
saying `then <expr>`. This is gated behind
`-enable-experimental-feature ThenStatements`
pending evolution discussion.
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
This source location will be used to determine whether to add a name lookup
option to exclude macro expansions when the name lookup request is constructed.
Currently, the source location argument is unused.
Instead of walking the single ASTNode from the
target, walk all AST nodes associated with the
target to find the completion expr. This is needed
to find the completion expr in a pattern for an
initialization target.
SE-390 concluded with choosing the keyword discard rather than forget for
the statement that disables the deinit of a noncopyable type. This commit
adds parsing support for `discard self` and adds a deprecation warning for
`_forget self`.
rdar://108859077
Introduce `ConstraintSystem::recordTypeVariablesAsHoles` as a
standard way to record that unbound type variables found in a
type are holes in the given constraint system.
When matching a result builder in the constraint system, the closure has already been pre-checked so we don’t need to pre-check it again. Also, we can continue type checking even if the closure contained an `ErrorExpr` since result builders are now type checked like regular closures.
Currently, this is staged in as `_forget`,
as part of SE-390. It can only be used on
`self` for a move-only type within a consuming
method or accessor. There are other rules, see
Sema for the details.
A `forget self` really just consumes self and
performs memberwise destruction of its data.
Thus, the current expansion of this statement
just reuses what we inject into the end of a
deinit.
Parsing of `forget` is "contextual".
By contextual I mean that we do lookahead to
the next token and see if it's identifier-like.
If so, then we parse it as the `forget` statement.
Otherwise, we parse it as though "forget" is an
identifier as part of some expression.
This way, we won't introduce a source break for
people who wrote code that calls a forget
function.
This should make it seamless to change it from
`_forget` to `forget` in the future.
resolves rdar://105795731
Provide ASTWalker with a customization point to specify whether to
check macro arguments (which are type checked but never emitted), the
macro expansion (which is the result of applying the macro and is
actually emitted into the source), or both. Provide answers for the
~115 different ASTWalker visitors throughout the code base.
Fixes rdar://104042945, which concerns checking of effects in
macro arguments---which we shouldn't do.
This fixes an issue if the range ends with a string literal that contains the IDE inspection target. In that case the end of the range will point to the start of the string literal but the IDE inspection target is inside the string literal and thus after the range’s end.
Introduce SingleValueStmtExpr, which allows the
embedding of a statement in an expression context.
This then allows us to parse and type-check `if`
and `switch` statements as expressions, gated
behind the `IfSwitchExpression` experimental
feature for now. In the future,
SingleValueStmtExpr could also be used for e.g
`do` expressions.
For now, only single expression branches are
supported for producing a value from an
`if`/`switch` expression, and each branch is
type-checked independently. A multi-statement
branch may only appear if it ends with a `throw`,
and it may not `break`, `continue`, or `return`.
The placement of `if`/`switch` expressions is also
currently limited by a syntactic use diagnostic.
Currently they're only allowed in bindings,
assignments, throws, and returns. But this could
be lifted in the future if desired.
Split out brace element handling for a couple of
walkers into a new function. The diff for this is
best viewed without whitespace changes. This
should be NFC.
The impact should be very high because the whole body is skipped
if the builder does not support some of the operations, otherwise
the fix would interfere with result builders that do support
operations but have syntactic issues in the body.
Resolves: rdar://89880662
In cases like:
```
if (...) {
<body>
} else if (...) {
<body>
} else if (...) {
<body>
}
```
Each branch should end with `buildOptional` wrapping `buildEither`
because there is no covering unconditional `else` in the sequence:
```
var $__builder: <<Type>>
if (...) {
$__builder = buildOptional(.some(buildEither(...)))
} else {
if (...) {
$__builder = buildOptional(.some(buildEither(...)))
} else {
if (...) {
$__builder = buildOptional(.some(buildEither(...)))
} else {
$__builder = buildOptional(.none)
}
}
}
```
Resolves: rdar://104345754
Placeholder variable that represents result of `if` should be placed
at the beginning of the statement, same goes for `Optional(.some(...))`
that wraps the expression in "then" branch.
Resolves: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/62848
