stringByAddingPercentEncodingWithAllowedCharacters() and
stringByAddingPercentEscapesUsingEncoding() to String?, and add API notes for
NSString to the same effect
Swift SVN r21007
To limit user confusion when using conditional expressions of type Bool?, we've decided to remove the BooleanType (aka "LogicValue") conformance from optional types. (If users would like to use an expression of type Bool? as a conditional, they'll need to check against nil.)
Note: This change effectively regresses the "case is" pattern over types, since it currently demands a BooleanType conformance. I've filed rdar://problem/17791533 to track reinstating it if necessary.
Swift SVN r20637
The length could already be given by the input sequence. Also, make it
accept any generic Sequence of bytes, rather than requiring an array.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17034413>
Swift SVN r20480
Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
Introduce the new BooleanLiteralConvertible protocol for Boolean
literals. Take "true" and "false" as real keywords (which is most of the
reason for the testsuite churn). Make Bool BooleanLiteralConvertible
and the default Boolean literal type, and ObjCBool
BooleanLiteralConvertible. Fixes <rdar://problem/17405310> and the
recent regression that made ObjCBool not work with true/false.
Swift SVN r19728
There's a regression here because we can no longer use "true" or
"false" with ObjCBool. We'll get that back when true and false become
literals.
Swift SVN r19694
There is some follow-up work remaining:
- test/stdlib/UnicodeTrie test kills the type checker without manual type annotations. <rdar://problem/17539704>
- test/Sema/availability test raises a type error on 'a: String == nil', which we want, but probably not as a side effect of string-to-pointer conversions. I'll fix this next.
Swift SVN r19477
Keep calm: remember that the standard library has many more public exports
than the average target, and that this contains ALL of them at once.
I also deliberately tried to tag nearly every top-level decl, even if that
was just to explicitly mark things @internal, to make sure I didn't miss
something.
This does export more than we might want to, mostly for protocol conformance
reasons, along with our simple-but-limiting typealias rule. I tried to also
mark things private where possible, but it's really going to be up to the
standard library owners to get this right. This is also only validated
against top-level access control; I haven't fully tested against member-level
access control yet, and none of our semantic restrictions are in place.
Along the way I also noticed bits of stdlib cruft; to keep this patch
understandable, I didn't change any of them.
Swift SVN r19145
rangeOfCharacterFromSet(_:options:range:)
The underlying Objective-C API could return an NSRange of NSNotFound. Swift's
String.Index can not represent that, so change the API to return an optional
Swift Range<Index> instead.
Swift SVN r18679
stringWithBytes(_:length:encoding:) was passing an array to Objective-C
incorrectly, and a garbage NSString was being constructed as a result.
Unhide the initializer was accidentally hidden.
Swift SVN r18674
There's a bit of a reshuffle of the ExplicitCastExpr subclasses:
- The existing ConditionalCheckedCastExpr expression node now represents
"as?".
- A new ForcedCheckedCastExpr node represents "as" when it is a
downcast.
- CoerceExpr represents "as" when it is a coercion.
- A new UnresolvedCheckedCastExpr node describes "as" before it has
been type-checked down to ForcedCheckedCastExpr or CoerceExpr. This
wasn't a strictly necessary change, but it helps us detangle what's
going on.
There are a few new diagnostics to help users avoid getting bitten by
as/as? mistakes:
- Custom errors when a forced downcast (as) is used as the operand
of postfix '!' or '?', with Fix-Its to remove the '!' or make the
downcast conditional (with as?), respectively.
- A warning when a forced downcast is injected into an optional,
with a suggestion to use a conditional downcast.
- A new error when the postfix '!' is used for a contextual
downcast, with a Fix-It to replace it with "as T" with the
contextual type T.
Lots of test updates, none of which felt like regressions. The new
tests are in test/expr/cast/optionals.swift.
Addresses <rdar://problem/17000058>
Swift SVN r18556
Many changes in how we're presenting the NSString APIs on String, most
notably that we now traffic in String.Index and Range<String.Index>
rather than Int and NSRange. Also we present NSString initializers that
can fail only as factory functions, and factory functions that can't
fail only as init functions.
About 25% of the API changes here have been reviewd by the Foundation
guys, and testing is, as it has always been, admittedly spotty. Dmitri
is going to be writing some more comprehensive tests.
Swift SVN r18553
assert() and fatalError()
These functions are meant to be used in user code. They are enabled in debug
mode and disabled in release or fast mode.
_precondition() and _preconditionFailure()
These functions are meant to be used in library code to check preconditions at
the api boundry. They are enabled in debug mode (with a verbose message) and
release mode (trap). In fast mode they are disabled.
_debugPrecondition() and _debugPreconditionFailure()
These functions are meant to be used in library code to check preconditions that
are not neccesarily comprehensive for safety (UnsafePointer can be null or an
invalid pointer but we can't check both). They are enabled only in debug mode.
_sanityCheck() and _fatalError()
These are meant to be used for internal consistency checks. They are only
enabled when the library is build with -DSWIFT_STDLIB_INTERNAL_CHECKS=ON.
I modified the code in the standard library to the best of my judgement.
rdar://16477198
Swift SVN r18212
... unless we actually hit one of the confusing cases involving
multi-dimensional arrays (e.g., Int[]?[]), at which point one needs to
write parentheses <rdar://problem/16737035>.
Swift SVN r18181
