Storing this separately is unnecessary since we already
serialize the enum element's interface type. Also, this
eliminates one of the few remaining cases where we serialize
archetypes during AST serialization.
If there are unresolved generic parameters present and we are trying
to diagnose problems related to initializer call, it makes sense to
check argument expression first, which might be erroneous and then move
on to the ambiguity checking instead of trying to lookup possible
constructors directly.
Add additional checks before trying to re-check argument expression in
`FailureDiagnosis::diagnoseImplicitSelfErrors` and before trying to use
its resulting type, which can only be either tuple or paren type.
It's undesirable to have generic type which contains type variables
as contextual conversion type while diagnosing sub-expressions, it's
going to result in attempt to convert generic arguments to unresolved
type which produces worse diagnostics than no contextual type at all.
Resolves: SR-3525.
In Swift 4 mode, no longer consider e.g. 'nsNumber as Int' or 'nsValue as NSRange' to be valid coercions. This would break compatibility with Swift 3, so in Swift 3 mode, accept the coercion, but *also* accept a checked cast without a warning, and raise a migration warning about the unchecked coercion.
Refactor TypeChecker::checkGenericArguments to enable it
to be used by FailureDiagnosis::diagnoseArgumentGenericRequirements,
which consolidates requirement checking in one place.
Previously all of the following would strip off varying amounts of
MetatypeType, LValueType, InOutType, DynamicSelfType, etc:
- ConstraintSystem::performMemberLookup()
- ConstraintSystem::lookupMember()
- TypeChecker::lookupMember()
- DeclContext::lookupQualified()
- Type::getContextSubstitutions()
The problem is that the higher level methods that took a lookup type
would call the lower level methods, and post-process the result using
the given lookup type. Since different levels of sugar were stripped,
it made the code hard to reason about and opened up edge cases, eg
if a DynamicSelfType or InOutType appears where we didn't expect it.
Since filtering out static/instance and mutating/nonmutating members
is done at higher levels, there's no reason for these name lookup
operations to accept anything other than nominal types, existentials
and archetypes.
Make this so with assertions, and deal with the fallout.
- TypeMatchVisitor doesn't like seeing ErrorTypes -- stop if we have one.
- Common logic for replacing type parameters and variables with
UnresolvedType.
- Fix crash in coerceToType() if one of the two types has an UnresolvedType
in it, but not at the top level.
Fixes one compiler_crasher and some regressions with upcoming patches.
Not sure why but this was another "toxic utility method".
Most of the usages fell into one of three categories:
- The base value was always non-null, so we could just call
getCanonicalType() instead, making intent more explicit
- The result was being compared for equality, so we could
skip canonicalization and call isEqual() instead, removing
some boilerplate
- Utterly insane code that made no sense
There were only a couple of legitimate uses, and even there
open-coding the conditional null check made the code clearer.
Also while I'm at it, make the SIL open archetypes tracker
more typesafe by passing around ArchetypeType * instead of
Type and CanType.
Currently if destination is unresolved instead of trying to re-typecheck
it again and diagnose structural problems which led to such outcome, it
gets completely ignored in favor of trying to type-check source without
contextual type. That leads to missed diagnostic opportunities, which
results in problems on AST verification and SIL generation stages, and
generally missleading errors e.g. `.x = 0`.
Resolves: SR-3506.
Crashers fixed are minor logic errors:
Patterns: Crash occurred when requesting the range of a created
Pattern. Validity of the range should be checked before returning it
to keep the entire range valid or invalid but never both.
ParseExpr/ParsePattern: The same fixes as the ones provided in #6319
CSDiag: The generic visitor needn’t look through TypeVarTypes either.
Fixes SR-2757.
Variables in capture lists are treated as 'let' constants, which can
result in misleading, incorrect diagnostics. Mark them as such in order
to produce better diagnostics, by adding an extra parameter to the
VarDecl initializer.
Alternatively, these variables could be marked as implicit, but that
results in other diagnostic problems: capture list variables that are
never used produce warnings, but these warnings aren't normally emitted for
implicit variables. Other assertions in the compiler also misfire when
these variables are treated as implicit.
Another alternative would be to walk up the AST and determine whether
the `VarDecl`, but there doesn't appear to be a way to do so.
This gives us much better diagnostics around things like
escaping-mismatched function parameters which would previously skip
this and produce bogus invalid conversion errors between “identical”
types.
If return expression uses closure parameters, which have/are
type variables, such means that we won't be be able to
type-check result correctly and, unfornutately,
we are going to leak type variables from the parent
constraint system through declaration types.
When running diagnostics for single expression closures,
explicitly disallow to produce solutions with unresolved type variables,
because there is no auxiliary logic which would handle that and it's
better to allow failure diagnosis to run directly on the closure body.
Obtain type of the result expression without applying solutions,
because otherwise this might result in leaking of type variables,
since we are not reseting result statement and if expression is
sucessfully type-checked its type cleanup is going to be disabled
(we are allowing unresolved types), and as a side-effect it might
also be transformed e.g. OverloadedDeclRefExpr -> DeclRefExpr.
Specialize and improve the "downcast only unwraps optionals"
diagnostic to provide specific diagnostics + Fix-Its for the various
casts of forced cast, conditional cast, and "isa" check. Specifically:
* With a forced cast, customize the diagnostic. We still insert the
appropriate number of !'s, but now we remove the 'as! T' (if an
implicit conversion would suffice) or replace the 'as!' with 'as'
(if we still need a bridge)
* With a conditional cast, only emit a diagnostic if we're removing
just one level of optional. In such cases, we either have a no-op
(an implicit conversion would do) or we could just use 'as' to the
optional type, so emit a customized warning to do that. If we are
removing more than one level of optional, don't complain:
conditional casts can remove optionals. Add the appropriate Fix-Its
here.
* With an 'is' expression, only emit a diagnostic if we're removing
just one level of optional. In this case, the 'is' check is
equivalent to '!= nil'. Add a Fix-It for that.
Across the board, reduce the error to a warning. These are
semantically-well-formed casts, it's just that they could be written
better.
Fixes rdar://problem/28856049 and rdar://problem/22275685.
