Protocol types cannot provide an implementation of their members — when
one is looked up on a protocol in that protocol’s context, we can
suggest using the dynamic `Self` type.
```
extension StaticP {
func bar() {
_ = StaticP.foo(a:) // suggest `Self.foo(a:)`
}
}
```
This reverts commit dc24c2bd34.
Turns out Chris fixed the build but when I was looking at the bots, his fix had
not been tested yet, so I thought the tree was still red and was trying to
revert to green.
This removes conformance of DarwinBool and ObjCBool to the Boolean protocol,
and makes the &&/||/! operators be concrete w.r.t. Bool instead of abstract
on Boolean.
This fixes some outstanding bugs w.r.t diagnostics, but exposes some cases
where an existing diagnostic is not great. I'll fix that in a later patch
(tracked by rdar://27391581).
In Swift, default arguments are associated with a function or
initializer's declaration---not with its type. This was not always the
case, and TupleType's ability to store a default argument kind is a
messy holdover from those dark times.
Eliminate the default argument kind from TupleType, which involves
migrating a few more clients over to declaration-centric handling of
default arguments. Doing so is usually a bug-fix anyway: without the
declaration, one didn't really have
The SILGen test changes are due to a name-mangling fix that fell out
of this change: a tuple type is mangled differently than a non-tuple
type, and having a default argument would make the parameter list of a
single-parameter function into a tuple type. Hence,
func foo(x: Int = 5)
would get a different mangling from
func foo(x: Int)
even though we didn't actually allow overloading.
Fixes rdar://problem/24016341, and helps us along the way to SE-0111
(removing the significance of argument labels) because argument labels
are also declaration-centric, and need the same information.
change includes both the necessary protocol updates and the deprecation
warnings
suitable for migration. A future patch will remove the renamings and
make this
a hard error.
Some modifications for the ms-extension option of the clang.exe in the Visual Studio 2015 development environment
This patch is only for swiftc.exe. I used the library set of Visual Studio 2015 Update 1 and recent version of swift-clang as the compiler. If you are using the real MSVC compiler, more patch might be required.
a match, since it *could* be, and typically conforms to whatever the expression is.
Fixing this improves the diagnostic in Constraints/closures.swift significantly, and
fixes these bugs:
<rdar://problem/21718970> QoI: [uninferred generic param] cannot invoke 'foo' with an argument list of type '(Int)'
<rdar://problem/21718955> Swift useless error: cannot invoke 'foo' with no arguments
where before we produced:
error: cannot invoke 'foo' with an argument list of type '(Int)'
and now produce:
x.swift:5:10: error: generic parameter 'A' could not be inferred
Whatever.foo(a: 23)
^
x.swift:1:7: note: 'A' declared as parameter to type 'Whatever'
class Whatever<A: IntegerArithmetic, B: IntegerArithmetic> {
^
It looks like the mapTypeIntoContext() call is using the wrong
'dc', because in fact we have no way of knowing what the original
'dc' was which produced the type parameters in question.
Really the problem is we're picking apart SubstitutedType here,
which is almost always the wrong thing to do. I don't think
SubstitutedType should exist at all.
To avoid the crash, just bail-out if 'dc' is not generic.
I'm intentionally avoiding a principled fix here to hasten the
apocalypse when all of CSDiag.cpp will collapse under its own
weight and get rewritten in a sane way.
Rather than relying on the embedding of default argument information
into tuple types (which is gross), make sure that the various clients
(type checker, type checker diagnostics, constraint application) can
dig out the callee declaration and retrieve that information from
there.
Like this:
MyEnumType(MyEnumType.foo)
This is missing 'rawValue:' label, but that won't actually fix this. A better fix is to just remove the unnecessary constructor call:
MyEnumType(MyEnumType.foo)
-->
MyEnumType.foo
Adds fixits for:
- Passing an integer with the right type but which is getting wrapped with a
different integer type unnecessarily. The fixit removes the cast.
- Passing an integer but expecting different integer type. The fixit adds
a wrapping cast.
If the expression type is RawRepresentable with an associated
RawValue type of T, and the contextual type is T, suggest adding
a '.rawValue' accessor call.
Also, suggest inserting the fixit in a few more cases, such as
dictionary keys.
This improves upon a previous patch which added a fix-it for the
other direction:
<55bf215feb>
Fixes <rdar://problem/26470490>.
semantically unambiguous.
We didn't actually intend to change how programmers normally
constructed these types, but the change to the object literal
syntax accidentally caused these initializers to have very
natural-seeming signatures. These initializers also created
possible ambiguities with the actual initializers. Renaming
them to refer to their function as literal initializers is the
right thing to do.
Unfortunately, this provided to be somewhat annoying, as the
code was written to assume that the argument tuple following
e.g. #colorLiteral could be directly passed to the initializer.
We solve this by hacking on both ends of the constraint system:
during generation we form a conversion constraint to the
original, idealized parameter type, and during application we
rewrite the argument tuple type to use the actual labels.
This nicely limits the additional complexity to just the
parts dealing with object literals.
Note that we can't just implicitly rewrite the tuple expression
because that would break invariants tying the labels to physical
source ranges. We also don't want to just change the literal
syntax again and break compatibility with existing uses.
rdar://26148507
as a failure to convert the individual operand, since the operator
is likely conceptually generic in some way and the choice of any
specific overload is probably arbitrary.
Since we now fall back to a better-informed diagnostics point, take
advantage of this to generate a specialized diagnostic when trying to
compare values of function type with ===.
Fixes rdar://25666129.
This reverts commit 073f427942,
i.e. it reapplies 35ba809fd0 with a
test fix to expect an extra note in one place.
as a failure to convert the individual operand, since the operator
is likely conceptually generic in some way and the choice of any
specific overload is probably arbitrary.
Since we now fall back to a better-informed diagnostics point, take
advantage of this to generate a specialized diagnostic when trying to
compare values of function type with ===.
Fixes rdar://25666129.
* Implement the majority of parsing support for SE-0039.
* Parse old object literals names using new syntax and provide FixIt.
For example, parse "#Image(imageLiteral:...)" and provide a FixIt to
change it to "#imageLiteral(resourceName:...)". Now we see something like:
test.swift:4:9: error: '#Image' has been renamed to '#imageLiteral
var y = #Image(imageLiteral: "image.jpg")
^~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
#imageLiteral resourceName
Handling the old syntax, and providing a FixIt for that, will be handled in a separate
commit.
Needs tests. Will be provided in later commit once full parsing support is done.
* Add back pieces of syntax map for object literals.
* Add parsing support for old object literal syntax.
... and provide fixits to new syntax.
Full tests to come in later commit.
* Improve parsing of invalid object literals with old syntax.
* Do not include bracket in code completion results.
* Remove defunct code in SyntaxModel.
* Add tests for migration fixits.
* Add literals to code completion overload tests.
@akyrtzi told me this should be fine.
* Clean up response tests not to include full paths.
* Further adjust offsets.
* Mark initializer for _ColorLiteralConvertible in UIKit as @nonobjc.
* Put attribute in the correct place.
<stdin>:1:16: error: nil cannot initialize specified type 'Int'
var foo: Int = nil
^
<stdin>:1:10: note: add '?' to form the optional type 'Int?'
var foo: Int = nil
^
?
With a TypeLoc, we have a chance to offer diagnostics or even fix-its
to the contextual type, even though it's not represented by an
expression in the constraint system. This commit mostly just passes it
through, without attempting to use it anywhere or even pass a real
TypeLoc (with a valid TypeRepr).
(It does drop the contextual type parameter from
typeCheckExpressionShallow, since there were zero callers using it.)
No functionality change...yet.
