We noticed some Swift clients rely on the serialized search paths in the module to
find dependencies and droping these paths altogether can lead to build failures like
rdar://85840921.
This change teaches the serialization to obfuscate the search paths and the deserialization
to recover them. This allows clients to keep accessing these paths without exposing
them when shipping the module to other users.
We've recently added the -experimental-hermetic-seal-at-link compiler flag,
which turns on aggressive dead-stripping optimizations and assumes that library
code can be optimized against client code because all users of the library
code/types are present at link/LTO time. This means that any module that's
built with -experimental-hermetic-seal-at-link requires all clients of this
module to also use -experimental-hermetic-seal-at-link. This PR enforces that
by storing a bit in the serialized module, and checking the bit when importing
modules.
The MemoryBuffer loader is used by LLDB during debugging to import binary Swift
modules from .swift_ast sections. Modules imported from .swift_ast sections are
never produced from textual interfaces. By disabling resilience the expression
evaluator in the debugger can directly access private members.
rdar://79462915
The check for implementationOnly imports was already done for types, but it was missing for functions.
Fixes a crash when implementationOnly-importing a C module.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-15048
rdar://81701218
Many, many, many types in the Swift compiler are intended to only be allocated in the ASTContext. We have previously implemented this by writing several `operator new` and `operator delete` implementations into these types. Factor those out into a new base class instead.
Rework Sendable checking to be completely based on "missing"
conformances, so that we can individually diagnose missing Sendable
conformances based on both the module in which the conformance check
happened as well as where the type was declared. The basic rules here
are to only diagnose if either the module where the non-Sendable type
was declared or the module where it was checked was compiled with a
mode that consistently diagnoses `Sendable`, either by virtue of
being Swift 6 or because `-warn-concurrency` was provided on the
command line. And have that diagnostic be an error in Swift 6 or
warning in Swift 5.x.
There is much tuning to be done here.
Many clients of the conformance lookup operations would prefer to get
an invalid conformance (== there is no conformance) rather than a
missing conformance. Parameterize the conformance lookup operations so
that most callers won't see missing conformances, by filtering them
out at the end. Opt-in those callers that do want to see missing
conformances so they can be diagnosed.
Introduce a second level of standard substitutions to the mangling,
all of the form `Sc<character>`, and use it to provide standard
substitutions for most of the _Concurrency types.
This is a precursor to rdar://78269642 and a good mangling-size
optimization in its own right.
If the `-static` option is specified, store that in the generated
swiftmodule file. When de-serializing, recover this information in the
representative SILModule.
This will be used for code generation on Windows. It is the missing
piece to allow static linking to function properly. It additionally
opens the path to additional optimization on ELF-ish targets - GOT, PLT
references can be avoided when the linked module is known to be static.
Co-authored by: Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@compnerd.org>
This allows library authors to pass down a project version number so that library users can conditionally
import that library based on the available version in the search paths.
Needed for rdar://73992299
Cross-module incremental builds require a stable source of fingerprint
information for iterable decl contexts. This is provided by the
incremental frontends when they produce partial swift module files.
Embedded in these files is a table of fingerprints, which are consumed
by merge-modules to construct a module-wide dependency graph that is
then serialized into the final merged swift module file. Unfortunately,
the implementation here iterated through the files in the module and
asked for the first fingerprint that would load for a particular
iterable decl context. If (more likely, when) the DeclID for that
serialized iterable decl context collided with another DeclID in the
wrong file, we would load that fingerprint instead.
Locate up to the module-scope context for an iterable decl context and
only load the fingerprint from there. This ensures that the fingerprints
in the partial modules matches the fingerprints in the merged modules.
rdar://77005039
Intro the concept of library access or distribution level to identify
layers of libraries and report public imports of private libraries from
public ones.
rdar://62934005
Using `-module-abi-name` for the `_Concurrency` module breaks older
Swift compilers. Instead, hard-code that "Swift" is the ABI name of the
"_Concurrency" module in the compiler to dodge the problem.
Introduce a new compiler flag `-module-abi-name <name>` that uses the
given name as the ABI name for the module (rather than the module's
name in source code). The ABI name impacts name mangling and metadata.
If a function uses a type imported as implementationOnly (or similar), it cannot be serialized.
I added a new API in ModuleDecl (canBeUsedForCrossModuleOptimization), which performs this check.
rdar://72864719
When importing Clang types.
This is not an option with Explicit Module Builds. If the module being built does not (directly or transitively) depend on `Foundation`, then attempting to load it will produce an error because Implicit module loading is no longer allowed..
This change addresses a small number of cases where ClangImporter relies on being able to load `Foundation` on-demand:
- When importing a single Decl from a clang module, we check whether it has certain conformances by checking all extensions of the NominalTypeDecl of the Decl in question, to see if any of the extensions contain the conformance we are looking for, but we only check extensions whose parent module is either the original module of the NominalTypeDecl or the overlay module of the NominalTypeDecl or Foundation. It seems that we do not need to actually import `Foundation` here, just checking the module Identifier should be sufficient.
- In `maybeImportNSErrorOutParameter`, change the behavior to have an exit condition based on whether `Foundation` can be imported, before attempting to load it.
- When checking whether or not we are allowed to bridge an Objective-C type, it also looks sufficient the query whether or not `Foundation` *can* be imported, without loading it.
```
@_specialize(exported: true, spi: SPIGroupName, where T == Int)
public func myFunc() { }
```
The specialized entry point is only visible for modules that import
using `_spi(SPIGroupName) import ModuleDefiningMyFunc `.
rdar://64993425
