NFC for now, but I've also added the infrastructure to allow
"early emission", i.e. emission directly from the original
RValueSource, which can be useful either as an optimization
(e.g. for Builtin.initialize) or a requirement for particularly
hacky SIL intrinsics should we need them (and I'm thinking of
needing one).
Swift SVN r23953
... now that we have an exquisitely shaved yak.
This provides a simple and uniform model for "let" constants: they are always either
immediately initialized in their declaration, or they are initialized dynamically
exactly once before any use.
This is a simple generalization of our current model for initializers, but enables
the use of let constants in more cases in local context, e.g. patterns like this:
let x : SomeThing
if condition {
x = foo()
} else {
x = bar()
}
use(x)
Previously this would have to be declared a "var" for no good reason: the value is
only ever initialized, never actually mutated.
The implementation of this is reasonably straight-forward now that the infrastructure
is in place: Sema treats 'let' constants as "settable" if they lack an initializer
(either in the declaration or in a non-PBD binding). This exposes them as an lvalue
at the AST level. SILGen then lowers these things to an alloc_stack, and DI enforces
the "initialization only" requirement that it already enforces for uninitialized 'let'
properties in structs/classes.
Swift SVN r23916
The underlying problem is that e.g. even if a method is private but its class is public, the method can be referenced from another module - from the vtable of a derived class.
So far we handled this by setting the SILLinkage of such methods according to the visibility of the class. But this prevented dead method elimination.
Now I set the SILLinkage according to the visibility of the method. This enables dead method elimination, but it requires the following:
1) Still set the linkage in llvm so that it can be referenced from outside.
2) If the method is dead and eliminated, create a stub for it (which calls swift_reportMissingMethod).
Swift SVN r23889
"isConstant" distinction. This was an irritating bit of redundant state
that was making the code more complicated. Clients of VarLoc really only
care about "has address" and "has box", not whether the VarLoc came from
a let or var (and if they did, they can ask the VarDecl directly). NFC,
just more "yak shaving" as Doug likes to say.
Swift SVN r23869
as passing self by value, not by inout. This is the correct representation at
the AST level, and we now lower self references as the new @in_guaranteed
parameter convention. This allows SIL clients (like DI) to know that a nonmutating
protocol method does not mutate the pointee passed into the method.
This fixes:
<rdar://problem/19215313> let properties don't work with protocol method dispatch
<rdar://problem/15821762> Self argument of generic curried nonmutating instance methods is inout
Swift SVN r23864
isn't used yet, but will be for modeling the self argument passed to an
address-only witness implementation. NFC since all this code is dead :-)
Swift SVN r23857
Using the intrinsics is obnoxious because I needed them
to return Builtin.NativeObject?, but there's no reasonable
way to safely generate optional types from Builtins.cpp.
Ugh.
Dave and I also decided that there's no need for
swift_tryPin to allow a null object.
Swift SVN r23824
them in a more consistent and principled way. Two changes here: MUI is generated
when a vardecl is emitted, not as a separate "MarkPatternUninitialized" pass. Second,
when generating a MUI for self parameters with a temporary alloc_stack (due to the
possibility of superclass remapping of self) emit the MUI on the allocation itself,
not on the incoming argument. This is a lot more consistent (dissolving a bunch of
hacks in DI).
In terms of behavior changes, this only changes the raw sil generated by SILGen and
consumed by DI, so there is no user-visible change. This simply unblocks future work.
Swift SVN r23823
We can't reliably reject raw values in an NS_ENUM's init(rawValue:), because the enum may have SPI or future values we don't statically know about. Fixes https://twitter.com/autorelease/status/524698585406124033
Swift SVN r23817
a capture list hung off the CaptureExpr it was associated with. This made
sense lexically (since a capture list is nested inside of the closure) but
not semantically. Semantically, the capture list initializers are evaluated
outside the closure, the variables are bound to those values, then the closure
captures the newly bound values.
To directly represent this, represent captures with a new CaptureListExpr node,
which contains the ClosureExpr inside of it. This correctly models the semantic
relationship, and makes sure that AST walkers all process the initializers of the
capture list as being *outside* of the closure.
This fixes rdar://19146761 and probably others.
Swift SVN r23756
Add the following functionality to the Swift compiler:
* covariant subtyping of Set
* upcasting, downcasting of Set
* automatic bridging between Set and NSSet, including
* NSSet params/return values in ObjC are imported as Set<NSObject>
* Set params/return values in Swift are visible to ObjC as NSSet
<rdar://problem/18853078> Implement Set<T> up and downcasting
Swift SVN r23751
haven't been type-checked.
Deserialization and so on can cause the creation of
synthetic external definitions after the type-checker
has finished processing. I hope we don't need them?
This really doesn't seem like the right fix, but the
alternative is a non-deterministic crash when emitting
a function body with no types. I haven't figured out
why it's non-deterministic.
Speculatively committing this while awaiting local
test suite verification.
Swift SVN r23734
or pointer depends on another for validity in a
non-obvious way.
Also, document some basic value-propagation rules
based roughly on the optimization rules for ARC.
Swift SVN r23695
This should have been done a long time ago since SILOptions are options that
should be able to effect everything SIL related. In this case I just want to
pass in a flag on the SILModule to enable +0 self. By putting it on the
SILModule I can conveniently check it in SILFunctionType without exposing any
internal state from SILFunctionType.cpp.
Swift SVN r23647
conservatively copying them.
Also, fix a number of issues with mutating getters that
I noticed while examining and changing this code. In
particular, stop relying on suppressing writeback scopes
during loads.
Fixes rdar://19002913, a bug where an unnecessary copy of
an array for a getter call left the array in a non-unique
state when a subsequent mutation occurred.
Swift SVN r23642
This means that even though the guaranteed parameter comes in at +0, we
immediately retain it and add a cleanup handler at the end of the function. Once
+0 self has been turned on, I will add a guaranteed optimization that removes
such retains, releases.
Tests will follow with the commit that enables the actual +0 self parameter.
Swift SVN r23627
Previously, we were binding optional l-values only when
performing an access. This meant that other evaluations
emitted before the formal access were not being
short-circuited, even if the language rules said they
should be. For example, consider this code::
var array : [Int]? = ...
array?[foo()] = bar()
Neither foo nor bar should be called if the array is
actually nil, because those calls are sequenced after
the optional-chaining operator ?.
The way that we currently do this is to project out
the optional address during formal evaluation. This
means that there's a formal access to that storage
beginning with the formal evaluation of the l-value
and lasting until the operation is complete. That's
a little controversial, because it means that other
formal accesses during that time to the optional
storage will have unspecified behavior according to
the rules I laid out in the accessors proposal; we
should talk about it and make a decision about
whether we're okay with this behavior. But for now,
it's important to at least get the right short-circuiting
behavior from ?.
Swift SVN r23608
variable part of the function prologue by omitting its location.
Fixes <rdar://problem/18989457> Xcode 6.2 6C86C (lldb-320.4.157) : po self returns error: Execution was interrupted, reason: EXC_BAD_ACCESS
Swift SVN r23569
It's not always correct to map a Swift Bool back to ObjCBool in C land, since Bool could have originally been a proper _Bool. Pass the clang::Decl down to type lowering so we can recognize this. We still don't have a great solution for block types, because there's no decl to refer to, and Swift's user-level type system erases the distinction between void(^)(_Bool) and void(^)(BOOL). However, this is enough to let us start using C APIs that traffic in _Bool.
Swift SVN r23546
Many individual LValue evaluations still reflect
broken semantics: for example, the index expression
in a subscript l-value is delayed until the l-value
is actually projected. But this is a necessary
step in the right direction.
Swift SVN r23532
This API didn't take accessibility into account in a useful way, and
usually did a more general search than what was actually needed. We've
gradually been replacing uses of it with either more safe or more direct
APIs, including a regular UnqualifiedLookup, DeclContext::lookupQualified,
or Module::lookupValue. Now it's gone.
No functionality change.
Swift SVN r23449
Before this patch there was no dependence visible to the optimizer between a
open_existential and the witness_method allowing the optimizer to reorder the
two instruction. The dependence was implicit in the opened archetype but this
is not a concept model by the SIL optimizer.
%2 = open_existential %0 : $*FooProto to $*@opened("...") FooProto
%3 = witness_method $@opened("...") FooProto,
#FooProto.bar!1 : $@cc(...)
%4 = apply %3<...>(%2)
This patch changes the SIL representation such that witness_methods on opened
archetypes take the open_existential (or the producer of the opened existential)
as an operand preventing the optimizer from reordering them.
%2 = open_existential %0 : $*FooProto to $*@opened("...") FooProto
%3 = witness_method $@opened("...") FooProto,
#FooProto.bar!1,
%2 : $*@opened("...") FooProto : $@cc(...)
%4 = apply %3<...>(%2)
rdar://18984526
Swift SVN r23438
Though the value may be statically known in some cases, that isn't good enough to do what we try to do with this information. In particular, if we invoke a class method on a MetatypeConversion, we want to dispatch to the method of the original metatype, not statically call the method of the converted type, which is what is evident in the AST. Fixes rdar://problem/18877135.
Swift SVN r23277
patterns show up in their own scopes, and the same variable name can be
reused in consecutive patterns.
<rdar://problem/15187441> Implement local variable debug scoping for variables declared in patterns
Swift SVN r23251
Refactor part of emitGlobalAccessor to emitOnceCall so it can be used
by both emitGlobalGetter and emitGlobalAccessor.
This is the second patch to use global getter for "let" globals.
rdar://16614767
Swift SVN r23107
without a valid SILDebugScope. An assertion in IRGenSIL prevents future
optimizations from regressing in this regard.
Introducing SILBuilderWithScope and SILBuilderwithPostprocess to ease the
transition.
This patch is large, but mostly mechanical.
<rdar://problem/18494573> Swift: Debugger is not stopping at the set breakpoint
Swift SVN r22978
Fixes a bug where dynamic dispatches of class methods or initializers through generic interfaces didn't redispatch to subclasses. Also fix up some logic errors noticed by inspection.
Swift SVN r22945
