For the purposes of availability calculations, direct use of
`llvm::VersionTuple` and `VersionRange` is discouraged, since these fundamental
version representations are divorced from their context. For example, comparing
an iOS platform version to a visionOS platform version is invalid since the
versioning systems of the two platforms differ. Although visionOS inherits
avialability from iOS, an iOS version must be converted to a visionOS version
prior to comparison. In the future, `AvailabilityContext` can be enriched to
carry the information necessary to verify that its algebraic operations are
being performed on compatible values.
NFC.
An `AvailabilityContext` represents an abstract version range in which
something is available. In the future, these version ranges may not necessarily
always correspond to operating system version ranges.
NFC.
This makes it easier to experiment with noescapable types in interop.
Moreover, we always wanted to have this annotation for completeness,
similar to SWIFT_NONCOPYABLE.
This type is non-copyable, but its implementation in libstdc++13 does not explicitly declare a deleted copy constructor.
After rebranch, we should start using API Notes to annotate the type as a non-copyable type in Swift.
For now, this change disables import of this type.
See https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/73086
rdar://134432426
Allow any declaration to be marked with `@unsafe`, meaning that it
involves unsafe code. This also extends to C declarations marked with
the `swift_attr("unsafe")` attribute.
Under a separate experimental flag (`DisallowUnsafe`), diagnose any
attempt to use an `@unsafe` declaration or any unsafe language feature
(such as `unowned(unsafe)`, `@unchecked Sendable`). This begins to
define a "safe" mode in Swift that prohibits memory-unsafe constructs.
- when compiling embedded cross compile target standard libraries, include AVR
- add 16-bit pointer as a conditional compilation condition and get the void pointer size right for gyb sources
- attempt to fix clang importer not importing __swift_intptr_t correctly on 16 bit platforms
- changed the unit test target to avr-none-none-elf to match the cmake build
[AVR] got the standard library compiling in a somewhat restricted form:
General
- updated the Embedded Runtime
- tweaked CTypes.swift to fix clang import on 16 bit platforms
Strings
- as discussed in https://forums.swift.org/t/stringguts-stringobject-internals-how-to-layout-on-16-bit-platforms/73130, I went for just using the same basic layout in 16 bit as 32 bit but with 16 bit pointers/ints... the conversation is ongoing, I think something more efficient is possible but at least this compiles and will probably work (inefficiently)
Unicode
- the huge arrays of unicode stuff in UnicodeStubs would not compile, so I skipped it for AVR for now.
Synchronization
- disabled building the Synchronization library on AVR for now. It's arguable if it adds value on this platform anyway.
Out of an abundance of caution, we:
1. Left in parsing support for transferring but internally made it rely on the
internals of sending.
2. Added a warning to tell people that transferring was going to
be removed very soon.
Now that we have given people some time, remove support for parsing
transferring.
rdar://130253724
`: AnyObject` was added only if there were no other constraints because
all of them would imply it before, with introduction of `Sendable` this
is no longer the case. Let's add `AnyObject` constraint unconditionally
and let generic signature builder deal with the redundancy.
Resolves: rdar://127520993
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
