For each decl that needs a `#_hasSymbol()` query function, emit the corresponding helper function body during IRGen. Use `IRSymbolVisitor` to collect linkable symbols associated with the decl and return true from the helper function if the address of every associated symbol is non-null.
Resolves rdar://101884587
The relationship between the code in these two libraries was fundamentally circular, indicating that they should not have been split. With other changes that I'm making to remove circular dependencies from the CMake build graph I eventually uncovered that these two libraries were required to link each other circularly, but that had been hidden by other cycles in the build graph previously.
This commit begins to generate correct metadata for @_objcImplementation extensions:
• Swift-specific metadata and symbols are not generated.
• For main-class @_objcImpls, we visit the class to emit metadata, but visit the extension’s members.
• Includes both IR tests and executable tests, including coverage of same-module @objc subclasses, different-module @objc subclasses, and clang subclasses.
The test cases do not yet cover stored properties.
non-throwing functions.
Activating swift-functions-errors tests
Inserting macros and additional parameters in C and C++ functions following the pattern to lowering to LLVM IR.
So far, static arrays had to be put into a writable section, because the isa pointer and the (immortal) ref count field were initialized dynamically at the first use of such an array.
But with a new runtime library, which exports the symbols for the (immortal) ref count field and the isa pointer, it's possible to put the whole array into a read-only section. I.e. make it a constant global.
rdar://94185998
This reverts the revert commit df353ff3c0.
Also, I added a frontend option to disable this optimization: `-disable-readonly-static-objects`
So far, static arrays had to be put into a writable section, because the isa pointer and the (immortal) ref count field were initialized dynamically at the first use of such an array.
But with a new runtime library, which exports the symbols for the (immortal) ref count field and the isa pointer, it's possible to put the whole array into a read-only section. I.e. make it a constant global.
rdar://94185998
This change extends the clang header printer to start emitting C++ classes for Swift struct types with the correct struct layout in them (size + alignment)
I wrote out this whole analysis of why different existential types
might have the same logical content, and then I turned around and
immediately uniqued existential shapes purely by logical content
rather than the (generalized) formal type. Oh well. At least it's
not too late to make ABI changes like this.
We now store a reference to a mangling of the generalized formal
type directly in the shape. This type alone is sufficient to unique
the shape:
- By the nature of the generalization algorithm, every type parameter
in the generalization signature should be mentioned in the
generalized formal type in a deterministic order.
- By the nature of the generalization algorithm, every other
requirement in the generalization signature should be implied
by the positions in which generalization type parameters appear
(e.g. because the formal type is C<T> & P, where C constrains
its type parameter for well-formedness).
- The requirement signature and type expression are extracted from
the existential type.
As a result, we no longer rely on computing a unique hash at
compile time.
Storing this separately from the requirement signature potentially
allows runtimes with general shape support to work with future
extensions to existential types even if they cannot demangle the
generalized formal type.
Storing the generalized formal type also allows us to easily and
reliably extract the formal type of the existential. Otherwise,
it's quite a heroic endeavor to match requirements back up with
primary associated types. Doing so would also only allows us to
extract *some* matching formal type, not necessarily the *right*
formal type. So there's some good synergy here.
This pipes the `-static` flag when building a static library into IRGen.
This should have no impact on non-Windows targets as the usage of the
information simply removes the `dllexport` attribute on the generated
interfaces. This ensures that a library built with `-static` will not
re-export its interfaces from the consumer. This is important to ensure
that the consumer does not vend the API surface when it statically links
a library. In conjunction with the removal of the force load symbol,
this allows the generation of static libraries which may be linked
against on Windows. However, a subsequent change is needed to ensure
that the consumer does not mark the symbol as being imported from a
foreign module (i.e. `dllimport`).
The RequirementSignature generalizes the old ArrayRef<Requirement>
which stores the minimal requirements that a conforming type's
witnesses must satisfy, to also record the protocol typealiases
defined in the protocol.
A "accessible" function that can be looked up based on a string key,
and then called through a fully-abstracted entry point whose arguments
can be constructed in code.
Previously, a LinkEntity for an AST async function pointer was built by
passing an AbstractFunctionDecl. Later, decl was used to construct a
SILDeclRef.
That arrangement meant that clients could not construct such a
LinkEntity whose SILDeclRef::Kind could not be inferred from the dynamic
type of the decl from which the SILDeclRef was constructed. In
particular, clients could not construct a LinkEntity for the initializer
corresponding to a ConstructorDecl.
Here, the arrangment is changed so that the LinkEntity for an AST async
function pointer is built by passing a SILDeclRef.
Gather 'round to hear tell of the saga of autolinking in incremental
mode.
In the beginning, there was Swift code, and there was Objective-C code.
To make one import bind two languages, a twinned Swift module named the same as an
Objective-C module could be imported as an overlay. But all was not
well, for an overlay could be created which had no Swift content, yet
required Swift symbols. And there was much wailing and gnashing of teeth
as loaders everywhere disregarded loading these content-less Swift
libraries.
So, a solution was found - a magical symbol _swift_FORCE_LOAD_$_<MODULE>
that forced the loaders to heed the dependency on a Swift library
regardless of its content. It was a constant with common linkage, and it
was good. But, along came COFF which needed to support autolinking but
had no support for such matters. It did, however, have support for
COMDAT sections into which we placed the symbol. Immediately, a darkness
fell across the land as the windows linker loudly proclaimed it had
discovered a contradiction: "_swift_FORCE_LOAD_$_<MODULE> cannot be
a constant!", it said, gratingly, "for this value requires rebasing."
Undeterred, we switched to a function instead, and the windows linker
happily added a level of indirection to its symbol resolution procedure
and all was right with the world.
But this definition was not all right. In order to support multiple
translation units emitting it, and to prevent the linker from dead
stripping it, Weak ODR linkage was used. Weak ODR linkage has the nasty
side effect of pessimizing load times since the dynamic linker must
assume that loading a later library could produce a more definitive
definition for the symbol.
A compromise was drawn up: To keep load times low, external linkage was
used. To keep the linker from complaining about multiple strong
definitions for the same symbol, the first translation unit in the
module was nominated to recieve the magic symbol. But one final problem
remained:
Incremental builds allow for files to be added or removed during the
build procedure. The placement of the symbol was therefore dependent
entirely upon the order of files passed at the command line. This was no
good, so a decree was set forth that using -autolink-force-load and
-incremental together was a criminal offense.
So we must compromise once more: Return to a symbol with common linkage,
but only on Mach-O targets. Preserve the existing COMDAT-friendly
approach everywhere else.
This concludes our tale.
rdar://77803299
Previously, because partial apply forwarders for async functions were
not themselves fully-fledged async functions, they were not able to
handle dynamic functions. Specifically, the reason was that it was not
possible to produce an async function pointer for the partial apply
forwarder because the size to be used was not knowable.
Thanks to https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/36700, that cause has been
eliminated. With it, partial apply forwarders are fully-fledged async
functions and in particular have their own async function pointers.
Consequently, it is again possible for these partial apply forwarders to
handle non-constant function pointers.
Here, that behavior is restored, by way of reverting part of
ee63777332 while preserving the ABI it
introduced.
rdar://76122027
Previously, thick async functions were represented sometimes as a pair
of (AsyncFunctionPointer, nullptr)--when the thick function was produced
via a thin_to_thick_function, e.g.--and sometimes as a pair of
(FunctionPointer, ThickContext)--when the thick function was produced by
a partial_apply--with the size stored in the slot of the ThickContext.
That optimized for the wrong case: partial applies of dynamic async
functions; in that case, there is no appropriate AsyncFunctionPointer to
form when lowering the partial_apply instruction. The far more common
case is to know exactly which function is being partially applied. In
that case, we can form the appropriate AsyncFunctionPointer.
Furthermore, the previous representation made calling a thick function
more complex: it was always necessary to check whether the context was
in fact null and then proceed along two different paths depending.
Here, that behavior is corrected by creating a thunk in a mandatory
IRGen SIL pass in the case that the function that is being partially
applied is dynamic. That new thunk is then partially applied in place
of the original partial_apply of the dynamic function.
Up to now, there had been no need to define a LinkEntity for a partial
apply forwarder. Now that async partial apply forwarders will each have
their own async function pointer, an entity is needed to pass to the
code that generates the async function pointers.
No demangling or remangling changes are required because that code has
existed for as long as partial apply forwarders to support demangling
their symbols.
