Most SDKs use only swiftinterfaces under usr/lib/swift. Let's make sure
we standardize this behavior and use only swiftinterface when they are
present, even if there are also binary swiftmodule files available.
Apply the same logic to SubFrameworks as well while we're at it.
rdar://145316821
If a conformance is unavailable then checking for the potential unavailability
of a witness doesn't make sense so skip it. This is necessary now because
availability scopes no longer constrain the platform introduction version for a
source range in that is annotated in source to be simultaneously unavailable
and also introduced in a later version.
This fixes a regression caused by https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/79249.
Resolves rdar://145255592.
Eventually, querying the `AvailabilityDomain` associated with an
`AvailabilitySpec` will require invoking a request that takes a `DeclContext`.
This means that any diagnostics related to the domain identified by an
`AvailabilitySpec` need to be emitted during type-checking rather than parsing.
This change migrates several `AvailabilitySpec` diagnostics from Parse to Sema
to unblock further work.
An `AvailableAttr` written in source with an unrecognized availability domain
is now only marked invalid after type-checking the attribute. This resulted in a
regression where `CaseIterable` synthesis was blocked incorrectly under the
following very narrow circumstances:
1. Every `@available` attribute on the elements of the enum is invalid.
2. The module is being emitted and lazy type-checking is enabled.
3. The enum is public and the only top-level declaration in the file.
Type-checking the attribute was delayed just enough that it would not be
considered invalid by the type the `CaseIterable` conformance was being
synthesized, resulting in a spurious error.
There were zero tests exercising `CaseIterable` synthesis for enums with
elements that have availability requirements, so I added some.
Resolves rdar://144897917.
If no available type eraser type exists, do not perform type erasure. If
multiple type erasers exist, choose the least available type eraser type.
Which type eraser to choose is based on the availability of the lexical
context of the erased expression.
* Include `DeclContext` of the node where possible
* Add 'default-with-decl-contexts' dump style that dumps the dect context
hierarchy in addition to the AST
* Support `-dump-parse` with `-dump-ast-format json`
Instead of making an undo() do an infer(), let's record fine-grained
changes about what was retracted, and directly re-insert the same
elements into the data structures.
When diagnosing a declaration that is more available than its context, to
preserve source compatibility we need to downgrade the diagnostic to a warning
when the outermost declaration is an extension. This logic regressed with
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/77950 and my earlier attempt to fix
this (https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/78832) misidentified what had
regressed.
Really resolves rdar://143423070.
When a method override is as available as the class it's a member of, then it
can't be any more available. It doesn't make sense to diagnose such a method as
less available than the method it overrides. This regressed recently for
methods belonging to classes that are nested inside extensions. The
availability of the derived class may be defined by its context, but the
compiler was only checking the availability attributes directly on the class.
Resolves rdar://143600638.
Also stop suggesting a '?' fix-it for casts, where it is not likely to
be helpful because the common intention is either to force the optional
or declare an IUO.
Since availability scopes may be built at arbitrary times, the builder may
encounter ASTs where SequenceExprs still exist and have not been folded, or it
may encounter folded SequenceExprs that have not been removed from the AST.
To avoid a double visit, track whether a SequenceExpr is folded and then
customize how ASTVisitor handles folded sequences.
Resolves rdar://142824799 and https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/78567.
Access-level on imports is designed to downgrade the visibility of
imported decls. Add a check to apply this logic only to decls that were
originally visible: public and same-package.
rdar://143008763
Recent refactoring fixed a bug that previously caused `f()` to be checked as if
it were unavailable only on macOS in the following example:
```
@available(macOS, unavailable)
struct Outer {
@available(*, unavailable)
func f() {
someFunctionUnavailableOnMacOS()
}
}
```
Unfortunately, fixing that bug made a different existing availability checking
rule more problematic. References to declarations that are unavailable on the
current platform have been diagnosed as unavailable even in contexts that are
universally unavailable. This long standing behavior is overly strict but it
rarely had consequences. However, now that the example above is modeled
correctly, this overly strict behavior is causing some source compatibility
issues. The easiest solution is to relax the overly strict checking.
Resolves rdar://141124478.
This PR adds a missing access level diagnostic when type checking
named patterns by walking the interface type to find the importing
decl to emit the diagnostic for.
Update the logic selecting the most restrictive import for a given
reference to account for @_exported imports from the local module. We
should always prioritize @_exported imports from the local module over
more restrictive same file imports. Only if an import from the same file
is also public we prefer it as it's more useful for diagnostics and
generally recommended to locally declare dependencies.
Also update the test that was meant to check this configuration to apply
two different variations, one for a module local @_exported and one
relying on the underlying clang module.
rdar://140924031
Avoid wrapping parameters in the function reference
for compound applies, and make sure we consult
the parameter label in the compound name if it's
present to determine whether to match using the
projected value or not. This matches the existing
logic in `unwrapPropertyWrapperParameterTypes`.
Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
