* Allow CodingKey conformance to be automatically derived for enums
which have no raw type (with no associated values) and which have
a raw type of String or Int.
* Allow Encodable and Decodable conformance to be automatically derived
for classes and structs with Encodable/Decodable properties
* Add initial unit tests for verifying derived conformance
(which can happen if an imported class has un-importable initializers)
Our initializer model guarantees that it's safe to inherit convenience
initializers when a subclass has implemented all designated
initializers, since each convenience initializer will be implemented
by calling one of the designated initializers. If one of the
designated initializers /can't/ be implemented in Swift, however,
then inheriting the convenience initializer would not be safe.
This is potentially a source-breaking change, so the importer will
only actually record that it failed to import something in when
compiling in Swift 4 mode.
rdar://problem/31563662
* Use the presence of an argument type to check for associated values
hasOnlyCasesWithoutAssociatedValues returns true for any serialized
enum declaration whether or not it has cases. This never really came
up because it's mostly relevant to Sema's proto-deriving mechanism. Fix
this by using the presence of the case's argument type instead.
* Separate checks for presence of cases and enum simplicity
Necessary because the old behavior was an artifact of the
implementation.
This commit does a few things:
1. It uses SwitchEnumBuilder so we are not re-inventing any wheels.
2. Instead of hacking around not putting in a destroy for .None on the fail
pass, just *do the right thing* and recognize that we have a binary case enum
and in such a case, just emit code for the other case rather than use a default
case (meaning no cleanup on .none).
rdar://31145255
In the general case, this is done by reverse engineering the "best"
places for requirements to go from the requirement signature.
Conformance/superclass requirements like Self: Foo and Self.T: Bar defer
to the inheritance clause if they appear there, or are attached to the
protocol where clause or T (respectively) if not. A conformance
requirement like Self.T.U: Baz will go on T (if T is declared in the
protocol being printed).
Same-type requirements always go in where clauses, and specifically a
where clause of an associated type that is mentioned in them, so
something simple like Self.T.U == Int goes on the T associated type
definition, and similarly Self.T.U == Self.V will go on V (it's kinda
nonsense, but also more directly connected to V). There's a left-bias
for cases without an "obvious" choice, meaning something more
complicated like Self.T.U == Foo<Self.V> will end up on T.
Requirements that don't fit elsewhere will go on the
protocol (e.g. Self.AssocTypeFromSuperProtocol == Int).
Use this in ProtocolDecl::requiresClassSlow(), and hope its presence
discourages more potentially-infinitely-recursive walks of the
inherited-protocols lists.
Previously some decls (TypeAliasDecl and ExtensionDecl) had bits
explicitly marking whether they've been validated, while other decls
just deduced this from hasInterfaceType. The doing the latter doesn't
work when the interface type can be computed before doing full
validation (such as protocols and associatedtypes, which have trivial
interface types), and so an explicit bit is adopted for all decls.
The list of directly inherited protocols of a ProtocolDecl is already
encoded in the requirement signature, as conformance constraints where
the subject is Self. Gather the list from there rather than separately
computing/storing the list of "inherited protocols".
The root cause is that NormalProtocolConformance::forEachValueWitness()
needs to skip protocol members that are not requirements.
Otherwise we end up passing such a non-requirement member down to
NormalProtocolConformance::getWitness() and hit an assert when we
cannot find it.
It looks like this code path was only ever hit from SourceKit.
The fix moves TypeChecker::isRequirement() to a method on ValueDecl,
and calls it in the right places.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3815>.
This is in preparation for generic subscripts, which will also
expose methods like getGenericSignature(), and so on.
ExtensionDecl, GenericTypeDecl and AbstractFunctionDecl all share
code. Instead of copy and pasting it yet again into SubscriptDecl,
factor it out into a common base class.
There are more yaks to shave here, but this is a step in the right
direction.
This function was returning an ArrayRef pointing into a data structure
that is easily mutated via code walking over that ArrayRef, which
could cause spooky side effects, particularly during
deserialization. Perform a defensive copy to eliminate such side
effects.
Storing this separately is unnecessary since we already
serialize the enum element's interface type. Also, this
eliminates one of the few remaining cases where we serialize
archetypes during AST serialization.
This is a generic signature that stores exactly the requirements that a
protocol decl introduces, not letting them be implied by the Self :
Protocol requirement, nor storing any requirements introduced by the
protocols requirements.
Specifically, suppose we have
protocol Foo {}
protocol Bar {}
protocol Baz {
associatedtype X : Foo
}
protocol Qux: Baz {
associatedtype X : Bar
}
The normal generic signature and (canonical) protocol requirement
signature of `Baz` will be, respectively
<Self where Self : Baz>
<Self where Self : Baz, Self.X : Foo>
And for `Qux`, they will be:
<Self where Self : Qux>
<Self where Self : Qux, Self : Baz, Self.X : Bar>
Note that the `Self.X : Foo` requirement is not listed.
For the moment, this is unused except for `-debug-generic-signatures`.
This is a temporary stop-gap for getting round-trip parsing
off the ground. The real fix, not re-injecting declarations
into an if-config's declaration context, is a deep dive and
is still ongoing.
Parsing declaration list (e.g. member list of nominal decl) is very
different from comma separated list, because it's elements are separated with
new-line or semi-colon. There's no good reason to consolidate them.
Also, declaration list in 'extension' or inside of decl '#if' didn't
emit diagnostics for consecutive declarations on a line.
class C {
#if true
var value: Int = 42 func foo() {}
#endif
}
extension C {
func bar() {} subscript(i: Int) -> Int {
return 24
}
}
This change consolidates declaration list parsing for
members of nominal decls, extensions, and inside of '#if'.
In addition, removed unnecessary property 'TrailingSemiLoc' from decl.
This commit introduces new kind of requirements: layout requirements.
This kind of requirements allows to expose that a type should satisfy certain layout properties, e.g. it should be a trivial type, have a given size and alignment, etc.
