For now these are underscored attributes, i.e. compiler internal attributes:
@_optimize(speed)
@_optimize(size)
@_optimize(none)
Those attributes override the command-line specified optimization mode for a specific function.
The @_optimize(none) attribute is equivalent to the already existing @_semantics("optimize.sil.never") attribute
introduce a common superclass, SILNode.
This is in preparation for allowing instructions to have multiple
results. It is also a somewhat more elegant representation for
instructions that have zero results. Instructions that are known
to have exactly one result inherit from a class, SingleValueInstruction,
that subclasses both ValueBase and SILInstruction. Some care must be
taken when working with SILNode pointers and testing for equality;
please see the comment on SILNode for more information.
A number of SIL passes needed to be updated in order to handle this
new distinction between SIL values and SIL instructions.
Note that the SIL parser is now stricter about not trying to assign
a result value from an instruction (like 'return' or 'strong_retain')
that does not produce any.
We can just use parseType() everywhere instead. We already check
for non-identifier types in inheritance clauses elsewhere, and indeed
we have to anyway because an identifier type might resolve to a
type alias whose underlying type is a non-nominal type.
It doesn't look like this change made any diagnostics worse, but if
we find a case where it did, we could revert it.
We allowed them for generic parameter inheritance clauses but
not anywhere else. While arguably this has stylistic benefits,
the restriction was not enforced consistently and was mostly a
result of implementation limitations.
Lift the restriction and fix things up where needed to make them
work. This brings us closer to allowing protocols to constrain
the 'Self' type to a subclass of a class by listing the class in
the protocol's inheritance clause, which was a feature from SE-0156,
but this doesn't quite work.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4678> and
<rdar://problem/31785092>.
We had two slightly different codepaths to diagnose ': class'
in an inheritance clause where it is not supported.
For generic parameters, we would fix the 'class' to 'AnyObject',
but for associated types we didn't do this. Perform the fix in
all cases where it makes sense and remove one of the two
diagnostics.
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
Consider a class hierarchy like the following:
class Base {
func m1() {}
func m2() {}
}
class Derived : Base {
override func m2() {}
func m3() {}
}
The SIL vtable for 'Derived' now records that the entry for m1
is inherited, the entry for m2 is an override, and the entry
for m3 is a new entry:
sil_vtable Derived {
#Base.m1!1: (Base) -> () -> () : _T01a4BaseC2m1yyF [inherited]
#Base.m2!1: (Base) -> () -> () : _T01a7DerivedC2m2yyF [override]
#Derived.m3!1: (Derived) -> () -> () : _T01a7DerivedC2m3yyF
}
This additional information will allow IRGen to emit the vtable
for Derived resiliently, without referencing the symbol for
the inherited method m1() directly.
Update error messages to mention the invalid character.
Improve the diagnostic of floating point exponents.
Add tests for error messages when parsing floating point exponents.
Update existing tests for new error messages.
Rephrased error message to indicate which character is unexpected.
Provide error message variations when parsing binary, octal, decimal (default), and hexadecimal integer literals.
Look for unexpected digits in binary and octal integer literals.
Look for unexpected letters in hex integer literals.
Resolves: SR-5236 rdar://problem/32858684
Using the attribute in this position is a relic from the Swift 2
days, and fixing it required letting invalid code fall through to
Sema instead of being diagnosed in Parse proper. Treat 'var'
in this position like 'let' by simply offering to remove it
instead of extracting it into a separate variable.
Fixing grammar in error messages:
"is obsoleted" is only used in context of "X is obsoleted by Y".
When used as a rough synonym of "deprecated" the program grammar is "is
obsolete".
It is apparently a common mistake for beginners to start the names of functions
etc. with numbers, and before this patch the diagnostic wasn't specific about
the problem. It seems likely that most instances of `func 1(...` will be
mistakes in this vein, so this patch specifically diagnoses that case, and also
parses the number as the identifier to avoid follow on errors about top-level
closures (from the {}) and other invalid syntax.
Fixes rdar://problem/32316666 .
This time, the warnings only fire when the class in question directly
conforms to NSCoding. This avoids warning on cases where the user has
subclassed something like, oh, UIViewController, and has no intention
of writing it to a persistent file.
This also removes the warning for generic classes that conform to
NSCoding, for simplicity's sake. That means
'@NSKeyedArchiverEncodeNonGenericSubclassesOnly' is also being
removed.
Actually archiving a class with an unstable mangled name is still
considered problematic, but the compiler shouldn't emit diagnostics
unless it can be sure they are relevant.
rdar://problem/32314195
This is accomplished by recognizing this specific situation and
replacing the 'objc' attribute with a hidden '_objcRuntimeName'
attribute. This /only/ applies to classes that are themselves
non-generic (including any enclosing generic context) but that have
generic ancestry, and thus cannot be exposed directly to Objective-C.
This commit also eliminates '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName'. It was
decided that the distinction between '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName' and
'@objc' was too subtle to be worth explaining to developers, and that
any case where you'd use '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName' was already a
place where the ObjC name wasn't visible at compile time.
This commit does not update diagnostics to reflect this change; we're
going to change them anyway.
rdar://problem/32414557
Swift 3 supported limited argument destructuring when it comes to
declaring (trailing) closures. Such behavior has been changed by
SE-0110. This patch aims to provide better error message as well
as fix-it (if structure of the expected and actual arguments matches)
to make the migration easier and disambiguate some of the common
mistakes.
Resolves: SR-4738, SR-4745, rdar://problem/31892961.
This introduces a few unfortunate things because the syntax is awkward.
In particular, the period and following token in \.[a], \.? and \.! are
token sequences that don't appear anywhere else in Swift, and so need
special handling. This is somewhat compounded by \foo.bar.baz possibly
being \(foo).bar.baz or \(foo.bar).baz (parens around the type), and,
furthermore, needing to distinguish \Foo?.bar from \Foo.?bar.
rdar://problem/31724243
* [Parse] Add diagnostic for mixed syntax availability attribute
When parsing a list of availablity specifications in the shorthand syntax, check to see that the next specification is also in shorthand syntax. If the next specification looks like an explicit “deprecated” (or similad) attribute, then emit a specific diagnostic about it to help the developer understand the problem.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4231
* [Parse] Add fix-it for single mixed availability syntax
For the scenario that’s described in SR-4231, when there is one shorthard syntax followed by ‘deprecated’ (or similar), then we can guess that the intention was to treat the shorthand as ‘introduced’ so that the two of them work together.
This guess is only made if there is one platform version constrain, that is followed by ‘deprecated’, ‘renamed’, etc. but not ‘introduced’.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4231
* Automatic formatting using git-clang-format
* Fix typos in test code and language in comment
Also, consistently names test functions as “deprecated” and "introduced"
* [Parse] Add note to explain the mixed availability syntax fix-it insertion
This change also moves the fix-it from the error to the note.
