A canonical conformance is defined as a conformance which:
- does not contain any non-canonical types.
- Its type and interface type should be canonical.
- Any referenced conformances should be canonical.
- Any used substitutions should be canonical as well.
A substitution is canonical if:
- its replacement type is canonical
- all of its conformances are canonical
ASTContext::getSpecializedConformance() already copies the
substitutions, so remove some AllocateCopy() calls.
Also, add a new overload taking a SubstitutionMap instead.
This allows removing some gatherAllSubstitutions() calls,
which have an allocation inside them.
Finally, remove the now-unused ModuleDecl parameter from
ProtocolConformance::subst() and make it public.
SubstitutionList is going to be a more compact representation of
a SubstitutionMap, suitable for inline allocation inside another
object.
For now, it's just a typedef for ArrayRef<Substitution>.
This is needed if we want to use Substitution::subst from inside Type::subst, which will be necessary for SILBoxTypes and maybe some day BoundGenericTypes. NFC yet.
When applying substitutions to substitution lists in SIL, we would
unpack the ArrayRef<Substitution> into a SubstitutionMap on each
iteration over the original ArrayRef<Substitution>. Discourage
this sort of thing by removing the API in question and refactoring
surrounding code.
Applying a substitution list to a Substitution is done in two
steps:
1) First, apply the substitution list to the original replacement
type R to get the substituted replacement type R'.
2) Second, for each abstract conformance of R from the original
substitution, look up a concrete conformance of R' from the
substitution list.
With minimized generic signatures, we would omit conformances of
a nested type T.A if they could be derived from some other
conformance already in the substitution list.
However, the derivation process was incorrect, because it would
only look at the canonical parent type T, and not any other parent
type that had a child A which was same-type equivalent to T.A.
For example, consider the following code:
protocol P1 { associatedtype A : P3 }
protocol P2 { associatedtype A : P4 }
protocol P3 {}
protocol P4 {}
func doSomething<T : P4>(...) {}
func doSomethingElse<T1 : P1, T2 : P2>(...) where T1.A == T2.A {
doSomething(...)
}
If we specialize doSomethingElse() with a pair of concrete types
to replace T1 and T2, we would need to find a concrete conformance
to replace the abstract conformance T2.A : P4 in the call to
doSomething().
Since the conformance of T2.A : P4 is a redundant requirement,
it does not appear in the conformance map; furthermore, T1.A and
T2.A are same-type equivalent, so they map to the same archetype.
We would therefore look at the canonical parent of T2.A, which is
T1, and look up the conformance of T1 : P1 in the substitution list.
However, the only requirement P1 imposes on A is the conformance
A : P3. There's no conformance A : P4 inside T1 : P1, so we would
hit an assertion.
Indeed, the conformance T1.A : P4 must be recovered from the
conformance of T2 : P2, because P2 requires that A : P4.
This patch ensures that the conformance can be found by changing
the ArchetypeConformanceMap from a simple mapping of archetypes
to conformances into a structure that records same-type constraints
as well.
So instead of just looking at the canonical parent of the archetype
T1.A, we consult the structure to check all archetypes that have
T1.A as a child, in this case both T1 and T2.
T2 : P2 contains the conformance we need, allowing the above code
to be specialized correctly.
These will be more useful once substitutions in protocol conformances
are moved to use interface types.
At first, these are only going to be used by the SIL optimizer.
This patch is rather large, since it was hard to make this change
incrementally, but most of the changes are mechanical.
Now that we have a lighter-weight data structure in the AST for mapping
interface types to archetypes and vice versa, use that in SIL instead of
a GenericParamList.
This means that when serializing a SILFunction body, we no longer need to
serialize references to archetypes from other modules.
Several methods used for forming substitutions can now be moved from
GenericParamList to GenericEnvironment.
Also, GenericParamList::cloneWithOuterParameters() and
GenericParamList::getEmpty() can now go away, since they were only used
when SILGen-ing witness thunks.
Finally, when printing generic parameters with identical names, the
SIL printer used to number them from highest depth to lowest, by
walking generic parameter lists starting with the innermost one.
Now, ambiguous generic parameters are numbered from lowest depth
to highest, by walking the generic signature, which means test
output in one of the SILGen tests has changed.
Again, we now pass in a GenericSignature so that we can walk its
requirements, rather than relying on the AllArchetypes list
embedded inside the GenericParamList.
This eliminates some minor overheads, but mostly it eliminates
a lot of conceptual complexity due to the overhead basically
appearing outside of its context.
The main idea here is that we really, really want to be
able to recover the protocol requirement of a conformance
reference even if it's abstract due to the conforming type
being abstract (e.g. an archetype). I've made the conversion
from ProtocolConformance* explicit to discourage casual
contamination of the Ref with a null value.
As part of this change, always make conformance arrays in
Substitutions fully parallel to the requirements, as opposed
to occasionally being empty when the conformances are abstract.
As another part of this, I've tried to proactively fix
prospective bugs with partially-concrete conformances, which I
believe can happen with concretely-bound archetypes.
In addition to just giving us stronger invariants, this is
progress towards the removal of the archetype from Substitution.
Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
Expose Substitution's archetype, replacement, and conformances only through getters so we can actually assert invariants about them. To start, require replacement types to be materializable in order to catch cases where the type-checker tries to bind type variables to lvalue or inout types, and require the conformance array to match the number of protocol conformances required by the archetype. This exposes some latent bugs in the test suite I've marked as failures for now:
- test/Constraints/overload.swift was quietly suffering from <rdar://problem/17507421>, but we didn't notice because we never tried to codegen it.
- test/SIL/Parser/array_roundtrip.swift doesn't correctly roundtrip substitutions, which I filed as <rdar://problem/17781140>.
Swift SVN r20418
Pass in the context generic parameters that correspond to the substitution vector in Substitution::subst. When we build the type substitution map, also collect the conformances from the substitutions into a map we can use to fill in those conformances in substituted substitutions where necessary, without relying on the '.Archetype' field.
Swift SVN r14964
Substitute a...um...substitution by remapping its Replacement mapping and recursively remapping any ProtocolConformances it has. Modify the Specializer to use Substitution::subst when specializing the substitutions of ArchetypeMethod and Apply instructions.
Swift SVN r12900
Previously, we only tracked the mapping from associated types to their
type witnesses. Now, also track the protocol conformances for each of
the requirements placed on the associated types.
Swift SVN r6655
