The previous code was too clever in trying to avoid work and missed
the fact that ClassDecl::getSuperclass produces an interface type but
the types in the inheritance clause are contextual types.
This actually successfully built:
- in non-WMO builds with a public subclass and an internal base class,
because the internal class symbol wouldn't get stripped out.
- in WMO builds with an internal subclass and a private base class,
because 'private' has no distinction at the linkage level for a WMO
build.
However, it's highly likely that trying to import a library containing
such types would result in instability (read: compiler and debugger
crashes), and it's clearly a mistake to allow this. (If you can't show
your superclass to a user in a library's generated interface,
something's definitely gone wrong.)
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6206
When testing KeyPathApplication constraints, we would keep going after rejecting a concrete KeyPath application by trying PartialKeyPath and AnyKeyPath, even though that's not what we want, since any key path application expression can type check with an AnyKeyPath. We would then miscompile by building the AST such that we applied the mismatched key path expression directly to the base. We also didn't handle expressions where the base was a subtype of the key path's base type correctly—the conversion means the base can't be written through in this situation, and we hardcoded the concrete-to-existential case instead of handling general conversions. Fix these problems, and add an AST verifier for KeyPathApplicationExprs to help catch problems in the future. Fixes SR-6300 | rdar://problem/35368903.
Swift's ASTContext contained all of the logic to find the complete list
of properties for an Objective-C class, which is used by the Clang importer
to influence the mapping of Objective-C names into Swift. Swift's
ASTContext also included a *cache* for this information, indexed by
the Clang `ObjCInterfaceDecl *`. However, this cache was getting
populated/queried from the Clang importer's name importer, such that
the keys would be Clang declarations used to build modules and then
deallocated. If that memory eventually gets reused for a different
`ObjCInterfaceDecl *`, we would get incorrect/stale all-properties
information.
Almost Surely fixes rdar://problem/35347167, which is a
nondeterministic failure where UIView's `addGestureRecognizer(_:)` gets
occasionally imported as `add(_:)`.
Fix a couple more places where we should not allow IUOs and add
additional tests for these as well as parallel tests for the long
spelling ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.
In Swift 4, properties declared with a sugared Optional type,
like Int?, have a default value of nil. This can be observed
in two ways:
- Classes and structs get an implicit no-argument initializer
- Designated initializers don't have to initialize this property
Note that this did not apply in general to properties where
the type was spelled explicitly as Optional<Int>, etc, mostly
because of implementation restrictions -- when we check if a
type has implicit initializers, we have not realized types for
all stored property members yet, and doing so is not really
possible without the iterative decl checker.
However, in some cases, we *did* perform default initialization
for Optional<Int>, because of some code duplication and
divergent code paths.
A recent refactoring cleaned up some of the mess in this area,
but accidentally broke source compatibility with code that
relied on the broken Optional<Int> case.
Fix this by simulating the old behavior in -swift-version 4,
and preserving the more correct behavior in -swift-version 5.
Fixes <rdar://problem/35319847>.
We allow definitions like this:
struct G<T> {}
typealias A = G
As a shorthand for
typealias A<T> = G<T>
A typealias like this cannot satisfy an associated type requirement
for the same reason that a generic typealias cannot satisfy an
associated type requirement, which was already handled.
Previously this would crash in the type checker or in IRGen.
This fixes a weird regression in a fixed compiler crasher from the
next patch.
We were allowing them in parens in some contexts, but shouldn't have.
Also added tests for function types and tuple return types to ensure
we're not allowing them in these places.
Attach this attribute to VarDecls declared as IUO, and to function decls
that have a result type that is an IUO.
NFC at the moment. Eventually we'll use these to determine where to
implicitly unwrap optional values.
Remove function-to-function type match score increase, which should only
happen contextually in presence of other restrictions, this used to fix
the case related to matching of arrays of functions with and w/e `throws`
as function parameters which used to be ambigious, and now handled by
collection-upcast conversion score.
Resolves: rdar://problem/35142121
SE-0054 specified that the use of implicitly unwrapped optionals was
limited to just a few places, but the implementation at the time did not
completely ban the other uses. This is another attempt to do so, but
it's only on for compilations in Swift 5 mode and later.
For earlier versions, we fall back on the existing implementation.
Fixes: rdar://problem/27707015
Per SE-0054, implicitly unwrapped optional is not a distinct type in the
type system, but rather just the notion that certain Optionals (denoted
by the sigil "!" rather than "?") can be implicitly unwrapped.
This is a first step in the direction of implementing this notion by
emitting a warning if the type is spelled out.
When overriding storage with a forced static dispatch materializeForSet,
the override's materializeForSet should not override the base
materializeForSet.
This is the case where a dynamic property witnesses a protocol
requirement, and Sema synthesizes a materializeForSet for it.
In this case, the synthesized materializeForSet dynamically dispatches
to the dynamic property's getter and setter, and the protocol witness
thunk directly calls the synthesized materializeForSet.
The subclass only needs to override the getter and setter in this case,
since the base class's materializeForSet will already do the right
thing.
In fact, marking it as an override exposes a problem where we cannot
serialize an xref to an imported property's materializeForSet, since
it was not created by the importer.
When a particular nominal type or extension thereof declares conformance
to a protocol, check whether that type or extension contains any members
that *nearly* match a defaulted requirement (i.e., a requirement that
is satisfied by something in a protocol extension), but didn’t match
for some reason and weren’t used to satisfy any other requirement of
that protocol. It’s intended to catch subtle mistakes where a default
gets picked instead of the intended member.
This is a generalization of the code we’ve had for @objc optional
requirements for a long time.
Fixes rdar://problem/24714887.
