Follow-up to ac6fd7214 that adds a similar feature for enums. This
probably doesn't come up much, but the infrastructure's already there.
(The previous commit showed that the other places we do recovery
already handle this from their normal collection of "dependency
types".)
The existing code already handles this, so it's just a matter of
testing what happens for these declarations that can be generic:
functions, initializers, and subscripts. (Enums are coming in the next
commit.) Note that we currently don't try to recover at all for a
struct or class whose generic requirements aren't valid anymore.
We could handle a typealias itself disappearing, but not if the
typealias was okay but the underlying type wasn't. This came up in
real Swift 3/4 mix-and-match code.
rdar://problem/34940079
If we can't resolve a cross-reference unambiguously, we're supposed to
produce an llvm::Error and let the calling code handle it. However, if
we couldn't even resolve the /type/ of the cross-reference, we would
just crash. Follow the supported error path in that case too -- in
many cases the error can just propagate upwards to something that can
handle it.
rdar://problem/34821187, plus an extra test case from
rdar://problem/35157494. (The latter will be fixed better later, but
meanwhile let's not regress on the crashing part.)
This shows up with swift_wrapper typedefs, which get imported into
Swift as structs. If someone makes an extension of a swift_wrapper
type, but the swift_wrapper is only applied in Swift 4 mode, that
extension will break any Swift 3 clients. Recover by just dropping
the extension entirely.
There's still more complexity around extensions---what if a
requirement can't be deserialized? what if something's depending on
the protocol conformance provided by the extension?---but the missing
base type case should be pretty safe. If you can't see the type at
all, things that depend on its conformances are already in trouble.
rdar://problem/33636733
When there's an Objective-C protocol that adopts other protocols, the
other protocols become part of the requirement signature. If that can
change, Swift conformances to that protocol will get very confused
when it comes time to deserialize the conformances that satisfy the
requirement signature.
To recover from this, just deserialize /all/ trailing conformances,
rather than follow the requirement signature, and match them up after
the fact. (This only works for Objective-C protocols where we know all
conformance requirements represent inherited protocols, as opposed to
constraints on associated types.)
rdar://problem/33356098
Currently some contextual errors are discovered too late
which leads to diagnostics of unrelated problems like argument
mismatches, these changes attempt to improve the situation
and try to diagnose contextual errors related to calls
before everything else.
Resolves: SR-5045, rdar://problem/32934129
Layout for an enum depends very intimately on its cases---both their
existence and what their payload types are. That means there's no way
to "partly" recover from failure to deserialize an individual case's
payload type, the way we can partly recover from failing to
deserialize an initializer in a class. Add deserialization recovery
to enums by validating all of their payload types up front, and
dropping the enum if we can't import all of the cases.
This is the first time where we're trying to do deserialization
recovery for a /type/, and that could have many more ripple effects
than for a var/func/subscript/init. A better answer here might be to
still import the enum but mark it as unavailable, but in that case
we'd have to make sure to propagate that unavailability to anything
that /used/ the enum as well. (In Swift, availability is checked based
on use of the name, so if someone manages to refer to an enum using
inferred types we'd be in trouble.)
There is one case here that's not covered: if an enum case has a
payload that references a type declaration nested within the enum, but
then that nested type /itself/ can't be loaded for some reason, we
have no way to check that up front, because we can't even try to load
the nested type without loading its parent DeclContext (the enum). I
can't think of an easy solution for this right now.
(In the future, we'll be able to support dropping a single case for
resilient enums. But we're not there right now.)
rdar://problem/31920901
This isn't an inherent limitation of the language---in fact, it would
be a problem for library evolution if you had to know a superclass's
full vtable contents to generate the vtable for a subclass. However,
that's exactly where we are today, and that's not going to change for
Swift 4.
One small hole in the Swift 3 / Swift 4 story.
More rdar://problem/31878396
This means both not crashing when we deserialize the protocol but
also emitting correct offsets for dynamic dispatch through the
protocol's witness table.
Also fix a bug with vtable and witness table slots for
materializeForSet accessors for properties that can't be
imported. Because materializeForSet doesn't have the type of the
property in its signature, it was taking a different failure path from
everything else, and that failure path didn't properly set the name or
flags for the missing member.
Finishes rdar://problem/31878396
As such, we no longer insert two placeholders for initializers that
need two vtable slots; instead we record that in the
MissingMemberDecl. I can see MissingMemberDecl growing to be something
we'd actually show to users, that can be used for other kinds of
declarations that don't have vtable entries, but for now I'm not going
to worry about any of that.
If a base method's not available, we already drop the overridding
method. Make sure this works even when the base method is itself
an override that failed to load.
Finishes up the "big four" non-type decl kinds. Unfortunately,
indiscriminately dropping members from a class affects the layout
of its vtable. That issue is tracked by rdar://problem/31878396.
If there's an error deserializing part of a type, just propagate it
out. Also add support for bound generic types. This isn't meant to be
full coverage of possible failures, just ones that are likely to come
up through the C/ObjC importer.
Still to do:
- Generic function types (only show up on functions)
- Unbound generic types (only show up on typealiases, which I may not
even tackle)
Proof-of-concept for the above. This shouldn't be common---renames are
far more likely, and those we can track---but occurs when the
swift_wrapper attribute (the implementation of NS_STRING_ENUM) is
active in Swift 4 but not in Swift 3.
Note that this only checks the canonical interface type of the
declaration, because the non-canonical type may contain references to
the declaration's generic parameters.
This keeps us from showing Swift 3 names in Swift 4 code;
unfortunately, as the test case shows, we still have a few cases where
Swift /4/ names will leak into Swift /3/ code. I'm considering this an
acceptable state of events for now.
Previously we had more ad hoc logic that tried to decide if it was
worth desugaring a type based on its structure. Now we instead look
for a typealias that might actually benefit from desugaring, and if
we don't find one we won't show the 'aka' note.
This is the same as the last few commits, but with the additional
complication of designated initializers affecting other behavior
around the type. In particular, convenience initializers cannot be
invoked on subclasses if the designated initializers are not all
present on the subclass. If a designated initializer is dropped, it's
not possible to satisfy that.
It would be nice to do better here, since a class's initializers are
mostly independent of the superclass's initializers. Unfortunately, it
still affects whether /this/ class can inherit convenience
initializers, as well as vtable layout. This is conservative, at
least.
In order to accomplish this, cross-module references to typealiases
are now banned except from within conformances and NameAliasTypes, the
latter of which records the canonical type to determine if the
typealias has changed. For conformances, we don't have a good way to
check if the typealias has changed without trying to map it into
context, but that's all right---the rest of the compiler can already
fall back to the canonical type.
Like the previous commit, but with added trickiness because we also
serialize the form of the PatternBindingDecl a property came from.
Make getPattern handle a failure in the simple case that overrides
use, and pass that up to the PatternBindingDecl initialization. (This
can result in zero-element PatternBindingDecls, but that's fine.)
'getPattern' is also a change from 'maybeGetPattern', but every caller
knows how many patterns it expects, so accomodating the "maybe" case
is no longer important.
That is, a Swift 3 target imported into a Swift 4 context or vice
versa. This requires serializing the compatibility mode explicitly,
instead of including it in the textual version string that's only
for debugging.
Proof-of-concept for this sort of recovery. In the real world, it's
more likely that this will happen due to differences between Swift 3
and Swift 4, rather than changes in what macros are defined, but the
latter can still happen when debugging.
There's a lot to do here to consider this production-ready. There are
no generics involved and no potential circular references, and the
/rest/ of the compiler isn't prepared for this either. But it's cool
to see it working!
Actually recovering is hidden behind the new
-enable-experimental-deserialization-recovery option; without it the
compiler will continue to eagerly abort.
