The Swift class model does not support overriding declarations where either
the overridden declaration or the overriding declaration are in an extension.
However, the Objective-C class model does, so marking the declaration as
@objc (when possible) will work around the limitation.
Customize the "cannot override declaration in extension" diagnostic to
suggest adding @objc to the overridden declaration in cases where
@objc is permitted. Fixes SR-6512 / rdar://problem/35787914.
A protocol extension initializer creates a new instance of the
static type of Self at the call site.
However a convenience initializer in a class is expected to
initialize an instance of the dynamic type of the 'self' value,
because convenience initializers can be inherited by subclasses.
This means that when a convenience initializer delegates to a
protocol extension initializer, we have to substitute the
'Self' type in the protocol extension generic signature with
the DynamicSelfType, and not the static type.
Since the substitution is formed from the type of the 'self'
parameter in the class convenience initializer, the solution is
to change the type of 'self' in a class convenience initializer
to DynamicSelfType, just like we do for methods that return
'Self'.
This fixes cases where we allowed code to type check that
should not type check (if the protocol extension initializer
has 'Self' in contravariant position, and we pass in an
instance of the static type).
It also fixes a miscompile with valid code -- if the protocol
extension initializer was implemented by calling 'Self()',
it would again use the static type and not the dynamic type.
Note that the SILGen change is necessary because Sema now creates
CovariantReturnExprs that convert a static class type to
DynamicSelfType, but the latter lowers to the former at the
SIL level, so we have to peephole away unnecessary unchecked_ref_cast
instructions in this case.
Because this change breaks source compatibility, it is guarded
by a '-swift-version 5' check.
We parse default argument expressions before building a
FuncDecl, so we might see GenericTypeParamDecls that have
not yet been re-parented to the FuncDecl's context.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5559>,
<rdar://problem/33539464>.
When calling a throwing function without 'try', let's suggest multiple
possibilities of note + fix-it for user to choose from.
Resolves: rdar://problem/33040113
Swift 3 supported limited argument destructuring when it comes to
declaring (trailing) closures. Such behavior has been changed by
SE-0110. This patch aims to provide better error message as well
as fix-it (if structure of the expected and actual arguments matches)
to make the migration easier and disambiguate some of the common
mistakes.
Resolves: SR-4738, SR-4745, rdar://problem/31892961.
We were not enforcing that operators were static if
the operator was defined in a final class, or if it
was defined in a non-final class but the operator was
itself final.
Fixes <rdar://problem/31469036>.
We can't reliably decide in the parser if a type was forgotten or a
wrong type was meant to be a type (e.g. `let x: class MyClass`).
This patch applies a heuristic that the parameter was most likely
forgotten if the next character is a closing bracket or a semantic
separator.
This catches the most common cases of function parameters and variable
declarations that are immediately initialised.
This fixes SR-4785.
* One-sided ranges and RangeExpression
* Remove redundant ClosedRange methods from String
* Fix up brittle tests
* Account for Substring update
* XFAIL range diagnostics on Linux
My original fix for rdar://problem/31794932 didn't work for generic
functions because it was checking in the unsubstituted interface
type. Check structurally instead. Fixes rdar://problem/31794932.
The throw-checking code wasn't properly coping with functions that
take a single, labeled argument, due to the longstanding lie that
pretends that functions take a tuple argument vs. zero or more
separate arguments. Here, the lie manifests as spurious "call can
throw, but is not marked as such" errors.
Fixes rdar://problem/31794932.
In an extension of a nested type, the extended type must be
fully qualified.
Also clean up the diagnostic logic a little bit and centralize
it in diagnoseUnknownType().
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4379>.
foo(_: 3) is equivalent to foo(3), so calling a function that has _ as
an argument label (func foo(`_`: 3)) still requires the _ to be
escaped. Before this patch, the compiler would suggest removing the `s,
even though that changes behaviour.
Fixes rdar://problem/31077797.
rdar://problem/21193574 says that this warning dates back to when closure args before default args used to be considered as trailing closures. This is not the case anymore so Jordan suggested we remove the warning.
Here, the 'self' value has a dynamic Self type, which we must strip
off when performing the conformance lookup.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2696>.
* Removed `parseConstructorArguments()`, unified with
`parseSingleParameterClause()`.
* Use `parseSingleParameterClause()` from `parseFunctionSignature()`, so
that we can share the recovery code.
* Removed `isFirstParameterClause` parameter from `mapParsedParameters`,
because it's predictable from `paramContext`.
wasn't being detected while parsing operator decls, and so declarations of
invalid operators would be accepted without error and then later couldn't
be used.
Now errors correctly and new tests added.
`InParam` was not used at all.
`StopAtTypeAttributes`
As far as I understand, this option *was* merely for improving diagnostic QoI
for declarations like:
func foo(@typeattr Arg) {}
to fix-it to:
func foo(_: @typeattr Arg) {}
But, this causes the very loudy diagnostics for misplaced type attributes.
For example, on:
func foo(@convention(block) x: () -> CInt) {}
test.swift:1:10: error: expected parameter name followed by ':'
test.swift:1:10: error: expected ',' separator
test.swift:1:10: error: expected ')' in parameter
test.swift:1:9: note: to match this opening '('
test.swift:1:10: error: consecutive statements on a line must be separated by ';'
test.swift:1:11: error: attribute can only be applied to types, not declarations
test.swift:1:21: error: expected declaration
test.swift:1:44: error: statement cannot begin with a closure expression
test.swift:1:44: note: explicitly discard the result of the closure by assigning to '_'
test.swift:1:44: error: braced block of statements is an unused closure
test.swift:1:6: error: expected '{' in body of function declaration
test.swift:1:44: error: expression resolves to an unused function
Now, we emit more accurate diagnostic:
test.swift:1:11: error: attribute can only be applied to types, not declarations
func foo(@convention(block) x: () -> CInt) {}
^
Note that This causes small regression in diagnostics for bare type parameter
like `func foo(@convention(c) () -> CInt) {}`:
Before:
test.swift:1:10: error: unnamed parameters must be written with the empty name '_'
func foo(@convention(block) () -> CInt) {}
^
_:
Now:
test.swift:1:11: error: attribute can only be applied to types, not declarations
func foo(@convention(block) () -> CInt) {}
^
test.swift:1:29: error: unnamed parameters must be written with the empty name '_'
func foo(@convention(block) () -> CInt) {}
^
_:
If we found any error in a list, in most cases, we cannot expect that the
following tokens could construct a valid element. Skip them, instead of trying
to parse them as the next element. This significally reduces bogus diagnostics.
Bailout if seeing tok::eof or token that can never start a element, after
parsing an element. This silences superfluous "expected ',' separator" error,
or misleading expected declaration error. What we should emit is
"expected ')' in expression list, or "expected '}' in struct".
A variadic parameter of function type must be @escaping -- we cannot
reason about an array of non-escaping closures, so this was a safety
hole.
Also, attempting to define an @autoclosure variadic did not produce a
diagnostic, but would fail later on if you actually tried to do
anything with it. Let's ban this completely.
Both changes are source breaking, but impact is limited to code that
was already only marginally valid.
When replace something with a punctuator, we often prefer adding spaces around it.
For instance,
func foo(): bar {}
// fix it
func foo() -> bar {}
In this case we want to add a space before '->', but not after that.
With this change, we can simply `fixItReplace(ColonLoc, " -> ")`.
`fixItReplace()` automatically adjust the spaces around it.
- If a parameter type is a sugared function type, mark the type
as non-escaping by default. Previously, we were only doing this
if the parameter type was written as a function type, with no
additional sugar.
This means in the following cases, the function parameter type
is now non-escaping:
func foo(f: ((Int) -> Void))
typealias Fn = (Int) -> Void
func foo(f: Fn)
- Also, allow @escaping to be used in the above cases:
func foo(f: @escaping ((Int) -> Void))
typealias Fn = (Int) -> Void
func foo(f: @escaping Fn)
- Diagnose usages of @escaping in inappropriate locations, instead
of just ignoring them.
It is unfortunate that sometimes we end up desugaring the typealias,
but currently there are other cases where this occurs too, such as
qualified lookpu of protocol typealiases with a concrete base
type, and generic type aliases. A more general representation for
sugared types (such as an AttributedType sugared type) would allow
us to solve this in a more satisfactory manner in the future.
However at the very least this patch factors out the common code
paths and adds comments, so it shouldn't be too bad going forward.
Note that this is a source-breaking change, both because @escaping
might need to be added to parameters with a sugared function type,
and @escaping might be removed if it appears somewhere where we
do not mark function types as non-escaping by default.
Member operators should be placed within a nominal type (or extension
thereof) that they operate on. Aside from being good style, enforcing
this in the type checker can help with dependency tracking. Addresses
rdar://problem/27536066.
If an inout parameter has an invalid type, we were unable to
distinguish it from a 'var' parameter, resulting in an invalid
diagnostic.
Fix this by adding a VarDecl::isInOut() flag, instead of
introspecting the type.
