This patch also refactors the structure of function signature node so
that closure signature can re-use parts of function signature. For
instance, we group arrow and return type to be "ReturnClause". And we
group parenthesized parameter list to be "ParamClause".
This structure of closure signature also calls for a good way to
represent either-or node in libSyntax APIs, since we've two ways to
specify parameters in closure: one is as regular function parameter and
the other is dot-separated simple names.
This patch also performs minor refactoring to align syntax parsing
context with the right scope. We start to support the generic clauses
because they are necessary pieces to construct struct or
function syntax node.
This commit starts to support syntax nodes for @ attributes list for
declarations. These attributes don't include modifiers like "static" or
access keywords. Along with the function change, the commit refactors
some existing code to reduce duplication.
* libSyntax: Parse member access expression.
This patch uses createNodeInPlace from syntax parsing context API to
merge an expression with its suffix to create recursive nodes such as
member access expression.
Meanwhile, this patch breaks down a signed integer or float literal to a
prefix operator expression. This expression consists of two parts: an
operator and the following expression. This makes literals like "+1" or
"-1" no different from other prefix unary expressions such as "!true".
* Generate libSyntax API
This patch removes the hand-rolled libSyntax API and replaces it with an
API that's entirely automatically generated. This means the API is
guaranteed to be internally stylistically and functionally consistent.
Previously, users of TokenSyntax would always deal with RC<TokenSyntax>
which is a subclass of RawSyntax. Instead, provide TokenSyntax as a
fully-realized Syntax node, that will always exist as a leaf in the
Syntax tree.
This hides the implementation detail of RawSyntax and SyntaxData
completely from clients of libSyntax, and paves the way for future
generation of Syntax nodes.
* Refactor Tuple Type Syntax
This patch:
- Refactors TypeArgumentListSyntax and
TypeArgumentListSyntaxData to use the SyntaxCollection and
SyntaxCollectionData APIs.
- Refactors TupleTypeElementSyntax to own its trailing comma, and
updates the tests accordingly.
- Provides an infrastructure for promoting types to use
the SyntaxCollection APIs
* Addressed comments.
* Renamed makeBlankTypeArgumentList()
* Update makeTupleType
* Changed makeTupleType to take an element list.
* Updated comment.
* Improved API for creating TupleTypeElementListSyntax'es
* Added round-trip test
* Removed last TypeArgumentList holdovers.
* Fixed round-trip test invocation
Implements the following grammar productions:
- function-parameter-list
- function-parameter
This is mostly reusable for other flavors of function declarations,
such as initializers and whatnot, but those will have separate
top-level syntax nodes.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4067
This will make it easier to incrementally implement syntax nodes,
while allowing us to embed nodes that we do know about inside ones
that we don't.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4062
Instead of spawning a thread across test iterations (whoops, out of
threads), use a thread pool of size 2. When turning off atomic caching,
this is enough to trigger a race in 5 iterations or fewer for me, so
10000 ought to be enough for most machines.
This should fix hitting the thread limit on Linux.
rdar://problem/30729901
Also includes for its substructure:
- function-call-argument
- function-call-argument-list
- symbolic-reference-expression (for the call target)
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4044
A return statement needs something to return, so implement
integer-literal-expression too. This necessarily also forced
UnknownExprSyntax, UnknownStmtSyntax, and UnknownDeclSyntax,
which are stand-in token buckets for when we don't know
how to transform/migrate an AST.
This commit also contains the core function for caching
SyntaxData children. This is highly tricky code, with some
detailed comments in SyntaxData.{h,cpp}. The gist is that
we have to atomically swap in a SyntaxData pointer into the
child field, so we can maintain pointer identity of SyntaxData
nodes, while still being able to cache them internally.
To prove that this works, there is a multithreaded test that
checks that two threads can ask for a child that hasn't been
cached yet without crashing or violating pointer identity.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4010
