If generic parameter associated with missing conformance comes
from different context diagnose the problem as "referencing" a
specific declaration from affected type.
Instead of simply pointing out which type had conformance failures,
let's use affected declaration instead, which makes diagnostics much
richer e.g.
```
'List<[S], S.Id>' requires that 'S.Id' conform to 'Hashable'
```
versus
```
initializer 'init(_🆔)' requires that 'E' conform to 'Hashable' [with 'E' = 'S.Id']
```
Since latter message uses information about declaration, it can also
point to it in the source. That makes is much easier to understand when
problem is related to overloaded (function) declarations.
Before:
module file's minimum deployment target is iOS 12.0:
/path/to/FooKit.swiftmodule
After:
compiling for iOS 11.0, but module 'FooKit' has a minimum deployment
target of iOS 12.0: /path/to/FooKit.swiftmodule
Also tweak the "incompatible target" error to include the module name.
rdar://problem/35546499
We previously shied away from this in order to not /accidentally/
depend on it, but it becomes interesting again with textual
interfaces, which can certainly be read by humans. The cross-file
order is the order of input files, which is at least controllable by
users.
This is how we originally controlled whether or not we printed out ownership
annotations when we printed SIL. Since then, I have changed (a few months ago I
believe) the ownership model eliminator to know how to eliminate these
annotations from the SIL itself. So this hack can be removed.
As an additional benefit, this will let me rename -enable-sil-ownership to
-enable-sil-ownership-verifier. This will I hope eliminate confusion around this
option in the short term while I am preparing to work on semantic sil again.
rdar://42509812
If, for whatever reason, a type used in an extension's generic
requirements is missing, just drop the whole extension. This isn't
wonderful recovery, but in practice nothing should be able to use the
extension anyway, since the relevant type in question is missing.
...Okay, that's not quite true; there could, for example, be inlinable
code that references one of these methods. However, that (1) isn't
worse than the behavior for any other inlinable code (which doesn't
yet attempt to recover from missing declarations), and (2) is still a
strict improvement over the current situation, where we will eagerly
abort the compiler trying to load the extension in the first place.
rdar://problem/40956460
Previously: "module compiled with Swift 4.1 cannot be imported in Swift
4.1.50" (i.e. following the -swift-version flag)
Now: "module compiled with Swift 4.1 cannot be imported by the Swift
4.2 compiler"
I'm pretty sure this is what I intended to do all along, and I just
messed it up when I originally implemented it. This is especially
important when working with downloadable toolchains, which would say
"module compiled with Swift 4.2 cannot be imported in Swift 4.1.50",
which is not really the problem at all. Now it'll fall back to the
more generic "module file was created by an older version of the
compiler" error.
armv7, armv7s, and armv7k all get encoded as "arm" in today's scheme
for swiftmodules, so we can't just use the CPU part of the triple as
the expected swiftmodule architecture in the diagnostic.
llvm::Expected/llvm::Error require that the error is not just checked
but explicitly handled. Since we're currently recovering as if nothing
happened, we need to use llvm::consumeError to throw the error info
away.
rdar://problem/40738521
Validation of the input side of FunctionTypeRepr was previously being done in Sema because of expression folding. If we instead push the invariant that the input TypeRepr should always be a TupleTypeRepr into the AST a number of nice cleanups fall out:
- The SIL Parser no longer accepts Swift 2-style type declarations
- Parse is more cleanly able to reject invalid FunctionTypeReprs
- Clients of the AST can be assured the input type is always a TupleType so we can flush Swift 2 hacks
Ideally `UnboundGenericType` should never be serialized but it is
currently allowed to make generic `typealias` declarations without
specifying generic parameters, so it should be allowed to cross
reference typealias decls in such types as well because `NameAliasType`
can't be used until generic parameters are resolved.
This is only a temporary fix and more comprehensive solution is still
pending here, most likely such declarations should not produce
`UnboundGenericType` but instead should copy generic parameters from
underlying type and produce proper `NameAliasType`.
Resolves: rdar://problem/37384120
Now that we use the C names of imported types in mangled names, it's
safe to resolve a compatibility alias when a type gets an
NS_SWIFT_NAME for the first time, rather than requiring the developer
to recompile the imported library.
This doesn't include generic types, which only applies for Objective-C
generics. There shouldn't be additional complications here but I want
to be extra careful.
rdar://problem/39661212
We have no generic environment in this case, and just need to print
the canonical generic parameter types.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7673>.
This flag supports promoting KeyPath access violations to an error in
Swift 4+, while building the standard library in Swift 3 mode. This is
only necessary as long as the standard library continues to build in
Swift 3 mode. Once the standard library build migrates, it can all be
ripped out.
<rdar://problem/40115738> [Exclusivity] Enforce Keypath access as an error, not a warning in 4.2.
This is unfortunate in that it makes the linker do extra work, but in
practice it probably doesn't matter much, and meanwhile it handles all
our problems with @inlinable.
Alternate solution to rdar://problem/39338239
This reverts commit bb16ee049d,
reversing changes made to a8d831f5f5.
It's not sufficient to solve the problem, and the choices were to do
something more complicated, or just take a simple brute force
approach. We're going with the latter.
This reverts commit ee6e190e09. It's not
sufficient to solve the problem, and the choices were to do something
more complicated, or just take a simple brute force approach. We're
going with the latter.
And provide better semantic background by surrounding 'nil' in ticks when it is referred to as a value
Added missing tests for certain cases involving nil capitalization
This can't arise from a clean build, but it can happen if you have
products lingering in a search path and then either rebuild one of
the modules in the cycle, or change the search paths.
The way this is implemented is for each module to track whether its
imports have all been resolved. If, when loading a module, one of its
dependencies hasn't resolved all of its imports yet, then we know
there's a cycle.
This doesn't produce the best diagnostics, but it's hard to get into
this state in the first place, so that's probably okay.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7483
Un-XFAIL tests on Linux now that ObjC interop is controllable. There
are a couple of tests that remain which are dependent on Foundation.
Fix a configuration issue that resulted in a number of tests failing on
Linux.
LinkNormal mode is used by the mandatory pipeline. It only needs
to deserialize what is necessary for code generation, that is
functions with shared linkage that must be emitted into the client.
To mark when a user of it is known to escape the value. This happens
with materializeForSet arguments which are captured and used in the
write-back. This means we need to keep the context alive until after
the write-back.
Follow-up patches to fully replace the PostponedCleanup hack in SILGen
by a mandatory SIL transformation pass to guarantee the proper lifetime
will use this flag to be more conservative when extending the lifetime.
The problem:
%pa = partial_apply %f(%some_context)
%cvt = convert_escape_to_noescape [not_guaranteed] [escaped] %pa
%ptr = %materialize_for_set(..., %cvt)
... write_back
... // <-- %pa needs to be alive until after write_back
It was only used in a few tests. Those tests now use -emit-sil instead
of -emit-silgen, with some functions marked @_transparent and a few
CHECK: lines changed now that the mandatory optimizations get to run.
Continue to emit notes for the candidates, but use different text.
Note that we can emit a typo correction fix-it even if there are
multiple candidates with the same name.
Also, disable typo correction in the migrator, since the operation
is quite expensive, the notes are never presented to the user, and
the fix-its can interfere with the migrator's own edits.
Our general guidance is that fix-its should be added on the main
diagnostic only when the fix-it is highly likely to be correct.
The exact threshold is debateable. Typo correction is certainly
capable of making mistakes, but most of its edits are right, and
when it's wrong it's usually obviously wrong. On balance, I think
this is the right thing to do. For what it's worth, it's also
what we do in Clang.
We use dummy symbols to force overlays not to get dropped when
autolinking, even if the user doesn't use anything from them
explicitly. This behavior is triggered by the semi-hidden flag
-autolink-force-load.
(It's semi-hidden because it has few legitimate uses in real life. If
you searched for "how to force autolinking to pick up a library" and
found this commit, don't just do this and move on. Come talk to me on
forums.swift.org.)
Previously we added these dummy symbols to every object file using
"common" linkage, a little-known feature added for C that ensures that
only one definition will actually get used in the final object file.
However, the way we were doing that wouldn't work so well for COFF,
and so in 1025eed64 Saleem changed this to use "weak ODR" linkage.
This has *nearly* the same effect, and avoids some other weirdness,
but has the downside of making the symbol in the final dylib "weak"
itself, meaning that some /other/ library could come along and
override it. That impacts loading time, and an Apple-internal tool
caught that as rdar://39019606.
To avoid this whole mess, "just" emit the symbol into the object file
that corresponds to the first file in the module, which allows us to
mark it as a normal public symbol.
P.S. None of this is actually important at the moment because all of
the overlays are built with single-threaded WMO, which always produces
one object file anyway. But I wanted to get it right once and for all.
Add serialization layouts for rare instructions that take extra attributes. We
can continue adding bits to these layout without affecting the layout of the
vast majority of instructions.
Introduce a new Type node, BoundNameAliasType, which describes a
reference to a typealias that requires substitutions to produce the
underlying type. This new type node is used both for references to
generic typealiases and for references to (non-generic) typealiases
that occur within generic contexts, e.g., Array<Int>.Element.
At present, the new type node is mainly useful in preserving type
sugar for diagnostics purposes, as well as being reflected in other
tools (indexing, code completion, etc.). The intent is to completely
replace NameAliasType in the future.
I am going to leave in the infrastructure around this just in case. But there is
no reason to keep this in the tests themselves. I can always just revert this
and I don't think merge conflicts are likely due to previous work I did around
the tooling for this.
