This helper function returns *this if the value is already at +1. Otherwise, if
the value is a +0 value, we copy the value. Since I am using this initially for
some experiments, I am hiding it behind the enable guaranteed normal arguments
flag.
rdar://34222540
conversions that reverse an implicit conversion done to align
foreign declarations with their imported types.
For example, consider an Objective-C method that returns an NSString*:
- (nonnull NSString*) foo;
This will be imported into Swift as a method returning a String:
func foo() -> String
A call to this method will implicitly convert the result to String
behind the scenes. If the user then casts the result back to NSString*,
that would normally be compiled as an additional conversion. The
compiler cannot simply eliminate the conversion because that is not
necessarily semantically equivalent.
This peephole recognizes as-casts that immediately reverse a bridging
conversion as a special case and gives them special power to eliminate
both conversions. For example, 'foo() as NSString' will simply return
the original return value. In addition to call results, this also
applies to call arguments, property accesses, and subscript accesses.
conversions and extend lifetimes over the call.
Apply this logic to string-to-pointer conversions as well as
array-to-pointer conversions.
Fix the AST verifier to not blow up on optional pointer conversions,
and make sure we SILGen them correctly. There's still an AST bug
here, but I'll fix that in a follow-up patch.
The reason that this is being done is that:
1. SILGenFunction is passed around all throughout SILGen, including in between
APIs some of which call the SILGenFunction variable SGF and others that call it
gen.
2. Thus when one is debugging code in SILGen, one wastes time figuring out what
the variable name of SILGenFunction is in the current frame.
I did not do this by hand. I did this by:
1. Grepping for "SILGenFunction &gen".
2. By hand inspecting that the match was truly a SILGenFunction &gen site.
3. If so, use libclang tooling to rename the variable to SGF.
So I did not update any use sites.
This is in preparation for removing the +0 self hack.
This commit in more detail does the following:
1. It adds Formal Evaluation Scopes to certain places where the scopes were
missing. Specifically:
a. The SILGenLValue cases are places where we are invoking accessors. In each
one of these cases, we had a formal evaluation scope in the accessor
itself, but we did not have a scope that closed over the base access and
the accessor access. The base access is a formal evaluation in the sense
that just like with inout bases, we must create a new reference to the
base and re-destroy the base in a chain of accesses. This is to ensure
that we do not extend the lifetime of the base inappropriately.
b. The SILGenPoly case is a place where we have never properly placed a
Formal Evaluation Scope and have completely been relying on the +0 self
hack to make sure that archetype callees are properly destroyed
immediately after a +0 call.
2. It changes all of the places in SILGen that emit self to using formal access
cleanups instead of normal cleanups.
rdar://29791263
The only difference is that the copy value API takes a ManagedValue. Hopefully
once we eliminate direct manipulation of SILValue in SILGen, we can get rid of
the emitManagedRetain API in SILGen.
rdar://29791263
new API called ManagedValue::unmanagedBorrow() for places where we were really trying to model
an exclusive borrow.
ManagedValue::unmanagedBorrow() is just the old implementation.
rdar://29791263
I am using this for implementing tight scopes around specific call sites. The
way that it works is that the class performs the copy and asserts if one has not
called the cleanup method before end of scope has occured.
rdar://29791263
[NFC] Add -enable-sil-opaque-values frontend option.
This will be used to change the SIL-level calling convention for opaque values,
such as generics and resilient structs, to pass-by-value. Under this flag,
opaque values have SSA lifetimes, managed by copy_value and destroy_value.
This will make it easier to optimize copies and verify ownership.
* [SILGen] type lowering support for opaque values.
Add OpaqueValueTypeLowering.
Under EnableSILOpaqueValues, lower address-only types as opaque values.
* [SIL] Fix ValueOwnershipKind to support opaque SIL values.
* Test case: SILGen opaque value support for Parameter/ResultConvention.
* [SILGen] opaque value support for function arguments.
* Future Test case: SILGen opaque value specialDest arguments.
* Future Test case: SILGen opaque values: emitOpenExistential.
* Test case: SIL parsing support for EnableSILOpaqueValues.
* SILGen opaque values: prepareArchetypeCallee.
* [SIL Verify] allow copy_value for EnableSILOpaqueValues.
* Test cast: SIL serializer support for opaque values.
* Add a static_assert for ParameterConvention layout.
* Test case: Mandatory SILOpt support for EnableSILOpaqueValues.
* Test case: SILOpt support for EnableSILOpaqueValues.
* SILGen opaque values: TypeLowering emitCopyValue.
* SILBuilder createLoad. Allow loading opaque values.
* SIL Verifier. Allow loading and storing opaque values.
* SILGen emitSemanticStore support for opaque values.
* Test case for SILGen emitSemanticStore.
* Test case for SIL mandatory support for inout assignment.
* Fix SILGen opaque values test case after rebasing.
This ensures that ownership is properly propagated forward through the use-def
graph.
This was the work that was stymied by issues relating to SILBuilder performing
local ARC dataflow. I ripped out that local dataflow in 6f4e2ab and added a
cheap ARC guaranteed dataflow pass that performs the same optimization.
Also in the process of doing this work, I found that there were many SILGen
tests that were either pattern matching in the wrong functions or had wrong
CHECK lines (for instance CHECK_NEXT). I fixed all of these issues and also
expanded many of the tests so that they verify ownership. The only work I left
for a future PR is that there are certain places in tests where we are using the
projection from an original value, instead of a copy. I marked those with a
message SEMANTIC ARC TODO so that they are easy to find.
rdar://28685236
Today, loads and stores are treated as having @unowned(unsafe) ownership
semantics. This leaves the user to specify ownership changes on the loaded or
stored value independently of the load/store by inserting ARC operations. With
the change to Semantic SIL, this will no longer be true. Instead loads, stores
have ownership semantics that one must reason about such as copy, take, and
trivial.
This change moves us closer to that world by eliminating the default
OwnershipQualification argument from create{Load,Store}. This means that the
compiler developer cannot ignore reasoning about the ownership semantics of the
memory operation that they are creating.
Operationally, this is a NFC change since I have just gone through the compiler
and updated all places where we create loads, stores to pass in the former
default argument ({Load,Store}OwnershipQualifier::Unqualified), to
SILBuilder::create{Load,Store}(...). For now, one can just do that in situations
where one needs to create loads/stores, but over time, I am going to tighten the
semantics up via the verifier.
rdar://28685236
This reverts commit r30272.
There's a way to fix Builtin.reinterpretCast that preserves SILGen
RValue invariants better according to JohnM. So although these changes
are valid, there will be no way for me to test them.
After reverting this, I will roll back in the change to
emitImplicitValueConstructor because I think the old code was
violating SILGen invariants.
Swift SVN r30306
This is required in order to fix Builtin.reinterpretCast for
address-only types. That upcoming fix will include a test case that
exposes this SILGen path.
Swift SVN r30272
completely destroyed when forwarded.
Also, make forwarding a cleanup a first-class operation
on cleanups, rather than setting the cleanup state directly.
Swift SVN r19332
We won't have any types where copying has an effect on the bit pattern (except for blocks, which need special handling anyway), and copy_value having a result makes optimizations more complex, so remove it.
Swift SVN r15640
