This leaves in the existing syntax for @unchecked T?. That will
be addressed in later patches.
There's still a mysterious case where some of the SIL output
includes UncheckedOptional<T> and some places T!.
Moreover, this doesn't handle SourceKit's behavior for printing
for overrides. This just handles parsing the 'T!' syntax.
Swift SVN r16945
Example:
test/Constraints/fixes.swift:54:9: error: value of optional type 'B?'
not unwrapped; did you mean to use '!' or '?'?
b = a as B
^
!
Swift SVN r16938
Introduce some infrastructure that allows us to speculatively apply
localized fixes to expressions during constraint solving to fix minor
typos and omissions. At present, we're able to introduce the fixes
during constraint simplification, prefer systems with fewer fixes when
there are multiple fixes, and diagnose the fixes with Fix-Its.
Actually rewriting the AST to reflect what the Fix-Its are doing is
still not handled.
As a start, introduce a fix that adds '()' if it appears to have been
forgotton, producing a diagnostic like this if it works out:
t.swift:8:3: error: function produces expected type 'B'; did you mean
to call it with '()'?
f(g)
^
()
Note that we did regress in one test case
(test/NameBinding/multi-file.swift), because that diagnostic was
getting lucky with the previous formulation.
Swift SVN r16937
- Change the parser to unconditionally reject @mutating and @!mutating with a fixit and
specific diagnostic to rewrite them into the [non]mutating keyword.
- Update tests.
This resolves <rdar://problem/16735619> introduce nonmutating CS keyword and remove the attribute form of mutating all together
Swift SVN r16892
Swift will use the basename + argument names formulation for
names. Update the DeclName interfaces, printing, and __FUNCTION__ to
use the method syntax.
We'll still need to rework the "x.foo:bar:wibble:" syntax; that will
come (significantly) later.
Swift SVN r15763
Language features like erasing concrete metatype
values are also left for the future. Still, baby steps.
The singleton ordinary metatype for existential types
is still potentially useful; we allow it to be written
as P.Protocol.
I've been somewhat cavalier in making code accept
AnyMetatypeType instead of a more specific type, and
it's likely that a number of these places can and
should be more restrictive.
When T is an existential type, parse T.Type as an
ExistentialMetatypeType instead of a MetatypeType.
An existential metatype is the formal type
\exists t:P . (t.Type)
whereas the ordinary metatype is the formal type
(\exists t:P . t).Type
which is singleton. Our inability to express that
difference was leading to an ever-increasing cascade
of hacks where information is shadily passed behind
the scenes in order to make various operations with
static members of protocols work correctly.
This patch takes the first step towards fixing that
by splitting out existential metatypes and giving
them a pointer representation. Eventually, we will
need them to be able to carry protocol witness tables
Swift SVN r15716
Originally, I didn't want this because I felt it made
unchecked-optional too non-local --- it wasn't always
obvious that an assignment might crash because it was
implicitly dropping optionality. And that's still a
concern! But I think that overall, if we're prepared
to accept that that danger is inherent in @unchecked T?,
this is a more consistent model: @unchecked T? means
that we don't know enough about the value to say for
certain that nil is a real possibility, so we'll let
you coerce it to the underlying type, and that coercion
just might not be dynamically safe. No more special
cases for calls and member access (to the user; of
course, to the implementation these are still special cases
because of lookup and overload resolution).
Swift SVN r14796
to a conversion restriction.
I'm pretty certain that this is *supposed* to be NFC, in that
any subtle differences between the two blocks are actually
inadvertent bugs.
Unify the two places that switch out on a conversion
restriction; I'm pretty sure they're supposed to be doing
the exact same thing, and that any differences between
flags/subFlags and whether to log the restriction kind
are inadvertent.
Swift SVN r14794
Resolve selector references using compound name lookup, pushing DeclNames a bit deeper through the type-checker and diagnostics as necessary.
Swift SVN r14791
This was blocked by some type-checker issues:
First, we weren't registering a constraint restriction when
tail-recursing in matchTypes (as opposed to when creating
a disjunction because multiple conversions applied). Do so,
and move the set of constraint restrictions to the constraint
system in order to make this simpler. A large amount of similar
solver state is already there, and of course solving the system
already prospectively modifies the constraint graph.
Second, only set up a potential existential conversion when
working with concrete types. Without this, we would fail to
typecheck conversions to optional protocol types, but not
optional class/struct/whatever types. It's not clear whether
whether we should ever really be considering conversions when
either of the types is non-concrete.
I believe it was the second fix which removed a need for a !
in the NewArray test case.
Swift SVN r14637
... but obviously not when we've statically derived the existential
metatype. This isn't quite the way I'd like to prohibit these issues,
but more work on existentials and metatypes is coming up shortly.
Swift SVN r14326
not to an arbitrary type that's convertible to the existential.
Arbitrary conversions aren't necessarily reversible.
The specific test case in rdar://16041990 involves a downcast
to String instead of NSString; that's supportable in principle,
but it's at the very least a significant feature, and clearly
there are non-reversible conversions out there.
Swift SVN r14028
matter whether the target type is a class existential.
The subtype relation should form a lattice and be intrinsically
reversible; everything else is a conversion.
Swift SVN r14027
- purge @inout from comments in the compiler except for places talking about
the SIL argument convention.
- change diagnostics to not refer to @inout
- Change the astprinter to print InoutType without the @, so it doesn't show
up in diagnostics or in closure argument types in code completion.
- Implement type parsing support for the new inout syntax (before we just
handled patterns).
- Switch the last couple of uses in the stdlib (in types) to inout.
- Various testcase updates (more to come).
Swift SVN r13564
Making DynamicSelf its own special type node makes it easier to opt-in
to the behavior we want rather than opting out of the behavior we
don't want. Some things already work better with this representation,
such as mangling and overriding; others are more broken, such as the
handling of DynamicSelf within generic classes and the lookup of the
DynamicSelf type.
Swift SVN r13141
a function conversion to be bad.
This encourages the type-checker to place conversions within
closures rather than outside; the test case here crashed in
SIL verification because of that. (Yes, that means that there's
an underlying problem still when the function conversion is
required; that's tracked by rdar://15875305.) But in general,
function conversions are likely to be expensive, and it's good
to avoid them when possible.
The setup work to add SK_FunctionConversion was accidentally
committed as part of r12813.
Swift SVN r12839
its basic logic in libAST, which both makes it easier to
implement and makes it possible to use in the places that
should care about it, i.e. in IR-gen and SIL-gen.
Per Doug, none of the places that were introducing
trivial-subtype constraints really needed to do so rather
than just using subtype constraints.
Swift SVN r12679
- MaterializeExpr can never be formed in an argument list (but
still can as the base object) so remove that case from CSApply.
- LValues never exist *inside* of tuples, so remove code related
to that.
Swift SVN r11889
