When converting a function with a completion handler
that has a Void success parameter, e.g
`(Void?, Error?) -> Void`, or more likely a
`Result<Void, Error>` parameter, make sure to omit
the `-> Void` from the resulting async function
conversion.
In addition, strip any Void bindings from an async
function call, and any explicit Void return values
from inside the async function.
Resolves rdar://75189289
struct Foo {
init(_ arg1: String, arg2: Int) {}
init(label: Int) {}
}
func test(strVal: String) {
_ = Foo(<HERE>)
}
In this case, 'strVal' was prioritized because it can use as an argument
for 'init(_:arg2:)'. However, argument labels are almost always
preferable, and if the user actually want 'strVal', they can input a few
characters to get it at the top. So we should always prioritize call
argument patterns.
rdar://77188260
Asking for Sendable conformances on this path is going to lead to
a traversal of the stored properties of the type. If there is an
interface type computation ongoing, as is very likely the case, this
traversal can wind up causing a cycle when it forces the interface type
of a member once again.
Request only the non-structural conformances to break the cycle.
rdar://77189542
It breaks withCheckedContinuation.
I have not gotten to the bottom of why. But for now disable the pass for
all async functions until we can fix it.
rdar://77166575
In a mixed Objective-C / Swift module, we have a Clang module overlay that’s a Source file, not a serialized AST as is currently assumed. That assumption caused a crash when retrieving the symbol graph as part of a cursor info request to SourceKit, which was invoked on a method defined in the Objective-C part of the module.
To fix the crash, recursively use the same logic that already exists to serialize a module to also serialize the clang overlay module since that function alreayd correctly handles the distinction between source files and serialized ASTs.
Resolves rdar://76951147
Don’t record a `memberOf` relationship if we couldn’t look up the target, e.g. because the member is declared in an extension whose extended type doesn’t exist.
Resolves rdar://74063899
The locations stored in .swiftsourceinfo included the presumed file,
line, and column. When a location is requested it would read these, open
the external file, create a line map, and find the offset corresponding
to that line/column.
The offset is known during serialization though, so output it as well to
avoid having to read the file and generate the line map.
Since the serialized location is returned from `Decl::getLoc()`, it
should not be the presumed location. Instead, also output the line
directives so that the presumed location can be built as per normal
locations.
Finally, move the cache out of `Decl` and into `ASTContext`, since very
few declarations will actually have their locations deserialized. Make
sure to actually write to that cache so it's used - the old cache was
never written to.
For example:
class Base {
init(_: Int) {}
convenience init(_: Int) { self.init() }
}
class Derived: Base {
convenience init(sub: Int) { self.init(sub) }
}
Derived(#^HERE^#
In this case, the call is type checked to 'Base.init(_:)' and 'Derived'
is wrapped with 'MetatypeConversionExpr' with type 'Base.Type'. We need
to look through it to get the 'TypeExpr' with 'Derived.Type'.
rdar://74233797
The triple name aarch64_32 does not actually name a valid platform. The
actual platform (and valid triple arch string, confusingly enough) is
arm64_32. Remap between the two to correct for this difference.
rdar://77281393
Import `Path.h` and `FileSystem.h` directly since they are the source
of `llvm::sys::path::extension` and `llvm::system::fs::OpenFlags`
respectively.
Resolves: rdar://77277253
Let's make use of a newly added "disable for performance" flag to
allow solver to consider overload choices where the only issue is
missing one or more labels - this makes it for a much better
diagnostic experience without any performance impact for valid code.
Cross-module incremental builds require a stable source of fingerprint
information for iterable decl contexts. This is provided by the
incremental frontends when they produce partial swift module files.
Embedded in these files is a table of fingerprints, which are consumed
by merge-modules to construct a module-wide dependency graph that is
then serialized into the final merged swift module file. Unfortunately,
the implementation here iterated through the files in the module and
asked for the first fingerprint that would load for a particular
iterable decl context. If (more likely, when) the DeclID for that
serialized iterable decl context collided with another DeclID in the
wrong file, we would load that fingerprint instead.
Locate up to the module-scope context for an iterable decl context and
only load the fingerprint from there. This ensures that the fingerprints
in the partial modules matches the fingerprints in the merged modules.
rdar://77005039
We already have special logic to extrac the closure for closures with capture lists, add the same kind of logic for closures that are marked `@convention(block)` etc.
Resolves rdar://75301524 [SR-14328]
mismatch.
If there's an error in property wrapper application, the backing property
wrapper type request will return a null type, which would cause the compiler
to crash because most error recovery code expects ErrorType. If the wrapper
application has an error, use the interface type of the parameter instead.
Without this when constructing an InstModCallback it is hard to distinguish
which closure is meant for which operation when passed to the constructor of
InstModCallback (if this was in Swift, we could use argument labels, but we do
not have such things in c++).
This new value type sort of formulation makes it unambiguous which callback is
used for what when constructing one of these.
In the following test case, we are crashing while building the generic signature of `someGenericFunc`, potentially invoked on `model` in line 11.
```swift
struct MyBinding<BindingOuter> {
func someGenericFunc<BindingInner>(x: BindingInner) {}
}
struct MyTextField<TextFieldOuter> {
init<TextFieldInner>(text: MyBinding<TextFieldInner>) {}
}
struct EncodedView {
func foo(model: MyBinding<String>) {
let _ = MyTextField<String>(text: model)
}
}
```
Because we know that `model` has type `MyBinding<TextFieldInner>`, we substitute the `BindingOuter` generic parameter by `TextFieldInner`. Thus, `someGenericFunc` has the signature `<TextFieldInner /* substitutes BindingOuter */, BindingInner>`. `TextFieldInner` and `BindingOuter` both have `depth = 1`, `index = 0`. Thus the verification in `GenericSignatureBuilder` is failing.
After discussion with Slava, the root issue appears to be that we shouldn’t be calling `subst` on a `GenericFunctionType` at all. Instead we should be using `substGenericArgs` which doesn’t attempt to rebuild a generic signature, but instead builds a non-generic function type.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We slightly regress in code completion results by showing two `collidingGeneric` twice in the following case.
```swift
protocol P1 {
func collidingGeneric<T>(x: T)
}
protocol P2 {
func collidingGeneric<T>(x: T)
}
class C : P1, P2 {
#^COMPLETE^#
}
```
Previously, we were representing the type of `collidingGeneric` by a generic function type with generic param `T` that doesn’t have any restrictions. Since we are now using `substGenericArgs` instead of `subst`, we receive a non-generic function type that represents `T` as an archetype. And since that archetype is different for the two function signatures, we show the result twice in code completion.
One could also argue that showing the result twice is intended (or at least acceptable) behaviour since, the two protocol may name their generic params differently. E.g. in
```swift
protocol P1 {
func collidingGeneric<S>(x: S)
}
protocol P2 {
func collidingGeneric<T>(x: T)
}
class C : P1, P2 {
#^COMPLETE^#
}
```
we might be expected to show the following two results
```
func collidingGeneric<S>(x: S)
func collidingGeneric<T>(x: T)
```
Resolves rdar://76711477 [SR-14495]
