According to Pavel, we want to eliminate allowing unresolved variables as much as possible. Removing this flag doesn’t break any test cases (at least not in a meaningful way) and fixes a crasher, so it seems reasonable to remove it.
Fixes rdar://76686564
For a function and call like
```swift
func test(_: Foo..., yArg: Baz) {}
test(.bar, #^COMPLETE^#)
```
the parser matches the code completion token to the `yArg` with a missing label, because this way all parameters are provided. However, because of this we don’t suggest any variables that could belong the the previous vararg list.
To fix this, if we encounter such a situation (argument without label after vararg), manually adjust the code completion token’s position in params to belong to the vararg list.
Fixes rdar://76977325 [SR-14515]
The actual fix is to perform qualified lookup on a TypeExpr in `collectPossibleCalleesForApply`.
This changes the behaviour of some test cases in `complete_multiple_trailingclosure.swift`, which now provide argument labels. To make the choices suggested less verbose, I refined the parameter matching to only match trailing closures to parameters of function types.
In `INIT_FALLBACK_1` we technically shouldn't be suggesting `arg3` based on the matched argument types (the closure returns `Int` and the constructor with `arg3` requires the closure to return `String`), but AFAICT we aren't doing type-checking at this stage, so there's no way to rule it out.
Currently, if the code completion token is after a label that refers to a vararg, it is part of that VarargExpansionExpr, so we don’t suggest the subsequent parameter’s label.
Add special handling to detect this situation and suggest the parameter label.
Fixes rdar://76355192
If have a function that takes a trailing closure as follows
```
func sort(callback: (_ left: Int, _ right: Int) -> Bool) {}
```
completing a call to `sort` and expanding the trailing closure results in
```
sort { <#Int#>, <#Int#> in
<#code#>
}
```
We should be doing a better job here and defaulting the trailing closure's to the internal names specified in the function signature. I.e. the final result should be
```
sort { left, right in
<#code#>
}
```
This commit does exactly that.
Firstly, it keeps track of the closure's internal names (as specified in the declaration of `sort`) in the closure's type through a new `InternalLabel` property in `AnyFunctionType::Param`. Once the type containing the parameter gets canonicalized, the internal label is dropped.
Secondly, it adds a new option to `ASTPrinter` to always try and print parameter labels. With this option set to true, it will always print external paramter labels and, if they are present, print the internal parameter label as `_ <internalLabel>`.
Finally, we can use this new printing mode to print the trailing closure’s type as
```
<#T##callback: (Int, Int) -> Bool##(_ left: Int, _ right: Int) -> Bool#>
```
This is already correctly expanded by code-expand to the desired result. I also added a test case for that behaviour.
Previously, we always assumed that the position in the arguments would match the position in the parameter, which isn’t true in case of defaulted arguments. Try matching parameters based on argument labels to give better completion results.
Fixes rdar://60346573
The `init` of `self.init` needs to be looked up on the Metatype of `self`, not on the type of `self` itself. We were already doing a similar special-casing for `super.init`, which I extened to also cover `self.init`.
Resolves rdar://36521732
Following on from updating regular member completion, this hooks up unresolved
member completion (i.e. .<complete here>) to the typeCheckForCodeCompletion API
to generate completions from all solutions the constraint solver produces (even
those requiring fixes), rather than relying on a single solution being applied
to the AST (if any). This lets us produce unresolved member completions even
when the contextual type is ambiguous or involves errors.
Whenever typeCheckExpression is called on an expression containing a code
completion expression and a CompletionCallback has been set, each solution
formed is passed to the callback so the type of the completion expression can
be extracted and used to lookup up the members to return.
Calculate and set the type relation in each result building logic which
knows the actual result type.
CodeCompletionResultBuilder couldn't know the actual result type. From
the declaration alone, it cannot know the correct result type because it
doesn't know how the declaration is used (e.g. calling? referencing by
compound name? curried?)
Since the user can now write additional member accesses off of an UnresolvedMemberExpr, we should offer all available completions rather than just those that match the contextual type.
Introduce 'TypeCheckSingleASTNode' mode that only type checks single body
element and dependent necessities (i.e. referencing ValueDecls and their
dependencies).
Renamed swift::typeCheckAbstractFunctionBodyAtLoc() to
swift::typeCheckASTNodeAtLoc(DeclContext *, SourceLoc). That type checks
innermost 'ASTNode' at the location. Also, 'TypeCheckSingleASTNode' mode
skips type checking any "body" of the node (i.e. BraceStmt elements for
function body, if statement body, closure body, etc.)
Added on-demand type checking using it:
- VarDecl in TapExpr
- ParamDecl in ClosureExpr
- Return type of ClosureExpr
- Binding value in control statements
(e.g. ForEachStmt, SwitchStmt, DoCatchStmt, etc.)
rdar://problem/63932852
func foo() {}
let a: Int = #^HERE^#
Previously, we marked 'foo()' as 'NotRecommented' because 'Void' doesn't
have any member hence it cannot be 'Int'. But it wass confusing with
'deprecated'.
Now that we output 'typerelation' which is 'invalid' in this case. So clients
can deprioritize results, or even filter them out.
rdar://problem/57726512
For exmaple:
func foo(_: Int, _: IntOption)
func foo(_: Float, _: FloatOption)
foo(intVal, .<HERE>)
Previously code completion suggests static member from 'IntOption' and
'FloatOption' without any prioritization. Prioritize members from
'IntOption' because the user probably wants to input them.
In such cases, 'CodeCompletionExpr' at the cursor position is
pre-typechecked to 'IntOption'. So mark results with matching type with
'ExprSpecific'.
rdar://problem/62121221
When completing inside tuple expressions, the context tuple type may
have fewer number of elements. In such cases, we cannot provide the
expected type.
rdar://problem/61668779
Call arguments sometimes affect the inference for the generic parameters of the
type expression. When we want to show all initializers from all
extensions, we do not want to infer any generic arguments.
rdar://problem/53516588
instead of the pre-typechecked type and the referenced decl in the AST
so that we can suggests all overloads even if it happen to be
typechecked to a method. For example
struct MyType {
func foo() {}
func foo(_ int: Int) {}
func foo(name: String, value: String) {}
}
func test(val: MyType) {
value.foo(#^COMPLETE^#)
}
In this case, the call is typechecked to 'MyType.foo(_:)', but we want
to suggest all overloads.
rdar://problem/59285399
let _: [Foo] = [
.create(str: Int)
.create(#^COMPLETE^#)
]
Previously, this completion used to fail because the array expression
isn't typechecked. We need to analyze the context type of the array
literal first, that defines the type of the unresolved member
expression.
rdar://problem/50696432
struct Wrap<T> {
func method<U>(_ fn: (T) -> U) -> Wrap<U> {}
}
func testGenricMethodOnGenericOfArchetype<Val>(value: Wrap<Val>) {
value.method(#^HERE^#)
}
In this case, the type of value is `Wrap<Val[archetype]>`.
`Type::getTypeOfMember()` for 'method' method returns
`( (Val[archetype]) -> U[generic param]) -> Wrap<U[generic param]>`
which crashs 'mapTypeIntoContext()' because it already hass archetype.
rdar://problem/52386176
```swift
protocol Proto {}
struct ConcreteProto {}
struct MyStruct<T> {}
extension MyStruct where T: Proto {
static var option: MyStruct<ConcreteProto> { get }
}
func foo<T: Proto>(arg: MyStruct<T>) {}
func test() {
foo(arg: .#^HERE^#)
}
```
In this case, the type of `MyStruct.option` is `MyStruct<ConcreteProto>`
whereas the context type is `MyStruct<T> where T: Proto`.
When checking the convertibility of them , we need to "open archetype types".
rdar://problem/24570603
rdar://problem/51723460
To return accurate type of the expression.
i.e.
MyType.foo(#^COMPLETE^# // -> (MyType) -> (args...) -> Result
MyType().foo(#^COMPLETE^# // -> (args...) -> Result
Accept `getInterfaceType->hasError()` declarations. Even if the part of
the declaration has error, we still have chance to get context info from
the other part of it. For instance:
func foo(x: Int, y: INt) { }
foo(x: #^COMPLETE^#
We should resolve 'Int' as the context type even if parameter `y` is an
error type.
In `<expr> '(' <code-completion-token>` case, we usually complete call
arguments. If '<expr>' isn't typechecked, for example, because of
overloading, we used to give up arguments completions.
Now, use possible callee informations from the context type analyzer. This
increases the chance to provide accurate completions.
rdar://problem/43703157
For:
class MyClass {
func foo(x: SomeType)
func foo(x: OtherType)
}
func test(obj: MyClass) {
obj.foo(x: <HERE>)
}
Type checker doesn't keep overloaded choices for 'obj.foo' in the AST
after typechecking. Code completion need to lookup members to collect
possible parameter types.
(and TupleExpr at non-call argument position).
Now, unresolved member completion in array literal should work.
Also, Don't calculate convertibility to 'Any' type. That would be a
noise to type relation because anything is convertible to 'Any'.
rdar://problem/43302814
Previously, local decls in trailing closure didn't show up if the
closure had preceding arguments and the completion was triggered at
beginning position of expression context. like:
funcName(x: arg1) {
var localVar = 12
if <HERE>
}
The completion mode used to be overwritten in 'completeCallArg()' which
is called from 'parseExprCallSuffix(). We should detect completion for
immediate argument position in 'parseExprList()'.
rdar://problem/41869885
