The closure does not escape the startAsyncLet - endAsyncLet scope. Even though it's (potentially) running on a different thread.
The substantial change in the runtime is to not call swift_release on the closure context if it's a non-escaping closure.
Repurpose mangling operator `Y` as an umbrella operator that covers new attributes on function types. Free up operators `J`, `j`, and `k`.
```
async ::= 'Ya' // 'async' annotation on function types
sendable ::= 'Yb' // @Sendable on function types
throws ::= 'K' // 'throws' annotation on function types
differentiable ::= 'Yjf' // @differentiable(_forward) on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjr' // @differentiable(reverse) on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjd' // @differentiable on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjl' // @differentiable(_linear) on function type
```
Resolves rdar://76299796.
The `_Concurrency` module provides APIs and runtime entry points that
are part of the core Swift model, but are separated into their own
module because it's helpful for staging development.
Use the new `-module-abi-name` feature to mangle contents of the
`_Concurrency` module as if they were already in the Swift module.
This sets the ABI up for the `_Concurrency` module being merged in to
the Swift module at some future point without changing mangling or
metadata.
Fixes rdar://74285139.
First, just call an async -> T function instead of forcing the caller
to piece together which case we're in and perform its own copy. This
ensures that the task is actually kept alive properly.
Second, now that we no longer implicitly depend on the waiting tasks
being run synchronously, go ahead and schedule them to run on the
global executor.
This solves some problems which were blocking the work on TLS-ifying
the task/executor state.
Add @concurrent to SIL function types, mirroring what's available on
AST function types. @concurrent function types will have by-value
capture semantics.
The `try await` ordering is both easier to read and indicates the order
of operations better, because the suspension point occurs first and
then one can observe a thrown error.
Implement SIL generation for "async let" constructs, which involves:
1. Creating a child task future at the point of declaration of the "async let",
which runs the initializer in an async closure.
2. Entering a cleanup to destroy the child task.
3. Entering a cleanup to cancel the child task.
4. Waiting for the child task when any of the variables is reference.
5. Decomposing the result of the child task to write the results into the
appropriate variables.
Implements rdar://71123479.
