Use this to remove the last bit of the hack to suppres noescape on setter
arguments. Add a more comprehensive test of noescape's interaction with
accessors.
This patch allows Parser to generate a refined token stream to satisfy tooling's need. For syntax coloring, token stream from lexer is insufficient because (1) we have contextual keywords like get and set; (2) we may allow keywords to be used as argument labels and names; and (3) we need to split tokens like "==<". In this patch, these refinements are directly fulfilled through parsing without additional heuristics. The refined token vector is optionally saved in SourceFile instance.
I noticed in a follow-up patch that if you just swiftc without passing Onone
these flags are not set and sometimes happen to default to right thing ... or
not; as can be seen by the test cases modified. For example, at Onone we are
supposed to include an extra swift module "SwiftOnoneSupport".
...which didn't do the right thing in the presence of ModuleMacro,
depending on the order the macros were referenced. Already covered by
test/ClangImporter/macros.swift, but it actually seems to improve the
behavior of some of the SourceKit tests as well.
Continuing rdar://problem/32199805, which is just "get macros working
with clang::ModuleMacro".
- Deinitializers never get a custom Objective-C name.
- Classes and protocols are never bridged themselves; that only matters
for structs and enums.
This avoids another circularity issue like the one in a8bc132565,
where the Clang importer ends up importing a class and hands it to the
type checker, which then asks about conformances. The conformance
lookup table goes to add the extension from the Swift module, except
that the Swift module is what asked for the import in the first place.
It's possible there's a more general solution here, but this
particular change is good even in the non-crashy cases, and definitely
safe for Swift 4.0. Even if the test case is even more idiosyncratic
than the last one.
The test case change for SourceKit is probably due to the first
category not triggering the import of the other two
categories. Changes in import order have been known to affect source
compatibility, though not frequently. However, categories are not
intended to be ordered in the first place. There's still more we can
do in this space, and implicitly depending on these calls /outside/ of
the importer to control category import order was quite brittle
anyway.
SR-5330 / rdar://problem/32677610
We don't need to force the creation of potential archetypes when
finding anchors, because new potential archetypes will only be created
by this process in ill-formed generic signatures. Tolerate failure
whenever this happens (for now) and the failure paths will become dead
once AlwaysPartial is eliminated fully.
* Give Sequence a top-level Element, constrain Iterator to match
* Remove many instances of Iterator.
* Fixed various hard-coded tests
* XFAIL a few tests that need further investigation
* Change assoc type for arrayLiteralConvertible
* Mop up remaining "better expressed as a where clause" warnings
* Fix UnicodeDecoders prototype test
* Fix UIntBuffer
* Fix hard-coded Element identifier in CSDiag
* Fix up more tests
* Account for flatMap changes
This reverts commit 25985cb764. For now,
we're trying to avoid spurious non-structural changes to the mangling,
so that the /old/ mangling doesn't appear to change. That doesn't mean
no changes at all, but we can save this one for later.
Enums with the ns_error_domain attribute represent codes for NSError,
which means Swift developers will expect to interact with them in
terms of Error. SE-0112 improved bridging for these enums to generate
a struct with the following form:
struct MyError: Error {
@objc enum Code: RawRepresentable {
case outOfMemory
case fileNotFound
}
var userInfo: [NSObject: AnyObject] { get }
static var outOfMemory: Code { get }
static var fileNotFound: Code { get }
}
where MyError.Code corresponds to the original MyError enum defined in
Objective-C. Until recently, both the enum and the synthesized struct
were marked as having the original enum as their "Clang node", but
that leads to problems: the struct isn't really ObjC-compatible, and
the two decls have the same USR. (The latter had already been worked
around.)
This commit changes the struct to be merely considered a synthesized
"external definition", with no associated Clang node. This meant
auditing everywhere that's looking for a Clang node and seeing which
ones applied to external definitions in general.
There is one regression in quality here: the generated struct is no
longer printed as part of the Swift interface for a header file, since
it's not actually a decl with a corresponding Clang node. The previous
change to AST printing mitigates this a little by at least indicating
that the enum has become a nested "Code" type.
That is, if you have this declaration:
struct Outer {
struct Inner {
// ...
}
}
and you're just printing 'Inner', print it like this:
struct Outer.Inner {
// ...
}
This comes up with the ClangImporter's import-as-member feature, and
is also about to affect how error code enums are imported as well.
This is currently only enabled in certain contexts: always when
printing interfaces, and for types (but not other members) when
printing declarations for Quick Help.
rdar://problem/28208090
- Allow them to use substitutions.
- Consistently use 'a' as a mangling operator.
- For generic typealiases, include the alias as context for any generic
parameters.
Typealiases don't show up in symbol names, which always refer to
canonical types, but they are mangled for debug info and for USRs
(unique identifiers used by SourceKit), so it's good to get this
right.
For instance:
protocol P1 {
func foo()
}
protocol P2 : P1 {
func bar()
}
extension P2 {
func foo() {}
}
We report the foo() in P2's extension as the default implementation of foo() declared in P1.
Instead of appending a character for each substitution, we now prefix the substitution with the repeat count, e.g.
AbbbbB -> A5B
The same is done for known-type substitutions, e.g.
SiSiSi -> S3i
This significantly shrinks mangled names which contain large lists of the same type, like
func foo(_ x: (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int))
rdar://problem/30707433
cfe9e6a3de removed calls to pre/post
printing of PrintStructureKind::GenericRequirement, so SourceKit DocInfo
requests started droping the markers for generic requirements, causing
some weirdness with documentation rendering and post-processing.
Restore the calls to printStructPre/Post when printing generic
requirements.
rdar://problem/30561880
In the following example, the two declarations should have
the same mangled type:
protocol P {
associatedtype P
}
func f1<T : P>(_: T) -> T.P where T.P == Int {}
func f2<T : P>(_: T) -> Int where T.P == Int {}
To ensure this is the case, canonicalize the entire
GenericFunctionType before taking it apart, instead of
canonicalizing structural components of it.
Rather than serializing the complete structure of all archetypes
(which is completely redundant), serialize a reference to their owning
generic environment as well as their interface type. The archetype
itself will be reconsituted by mapping the interface type into that
generic environment.
Introduce an algorithm to canonicalize and minimize same-type
constraints. The algorithm itself computes the equivalence classes
that would exist if all explicitly-provided same-type constraints are
ignored, and then forms a minimal, canonical set of explicit same-type
constraints to reform the actual equivalence class known to the type
checker. This should eliminate a number of problems we've seen with
inconsistently-chosen same-type constraints affecting
canonicalization.
When enumerating requirements, always use the archetype anchors to
express requirements. Unlike "representatives", which are simply there
to maintain the union-find data structure used to track equivalence
classes of potential archetypes, archetype anchors are the
ABI-stable canonical types within a fully-formed generic signature.
The test case churn comes from two places. First, while
representatives are *often* the same as the archetype anchors, they
aren't *always* the same. Where they differ, we'll see a change in
both the printed generic signature and, therefore, it's
mangling.
Additionally, requirement inference now takes much greater
care to make sure that the first types in the requirement follow
archetype anchor ordering, so actual conformance requirements occur in
the requirement list at the archetype anchor---not at the first type
that is equivalent to the anchor---which permits the simplification in
IRGen's emission of polymorphic arguments.
