Extensions cannot be uniquely cross-referenced, so cross-references to
extensions are serialized with the extended nominal type name and the
module in which the extension resides. This is not sufficient when
cross-referencing the generic type parameters of a constrained
protocol extension, because we don't know whether to get the
archetypes of the nominal type or some extension thereof. Serialize
the canonical generic signature so that we can pick an extension with
the same generic signature; it doesn't matter which we pick, so long
as we're consistent.
Fixes rdar://problem/20680169. Triggering this involves some
interesting interactions between the optimizer and standard library;
the standard library updates in the radar will test this.
Swift SVN r27825
the printed interface.
Previously we printed the typechecked and uniqued requirements and the result was non-sensical.
Long-term the requirements will be preserved in a better form but for now print the requirements
and serialize them.
rdar://19963093
Swift SVN r27680
Allow an unversioned 'deprecated' attribute to specify unconditional
deprecation of an API, e.g.,
@availability(*, deprecated, message="sorry")
func foo() { }
Also support platform-specific deprecation, e.g.,
@availability(iOS, deprecated, message="don't use this on iOS")
func bar() { }
Addresses rdar://problem/20562871.
Swift SVN r27355
Allow an unversioned 'deprecated' attribute to specify unconditional
deprecation of an API, e.g.,
@availability(*, deprecated, message="sorry")
func foo() { }
Also support platform-specific deprecation, e.g.,
@availability(iOS, deprecated, message="don't use this on iOS")
func bar() { }
Addresses rdar://problem/20562871.
Swift SVN r27339
This is an internal-only affordance for the numerics team to be able to work on SIMD-compatible types. For now, it can only increase alignment of fixed-layout structs and enums; dynamic layout, classes, and other obvious extensions are left to another day when we can design a proper layout control design.
Swift SVN r27323
Currently untestable (due to SILGen's inability to handle throwing
@objc methods), but testing will become trivial once that's in place.
Swift SVN r27294
Currently untestable (due to SILGen's inability to handle throwing
@objc methods), but testing will become trivial once that's in place.
Swift SVN r27290
These aren't really orthogonal concerns--you'll never have a @thick @cc(objc_method), or an @objc_block @cc(witness_method)--and we have gross decision trees all over the codebase that try to hopscotch between the subset of combinations that make sense. Stop the madness by eliminating AbstractCC and folding its states into SILFunctionTypeRepresentation. This cleans up a ton of code across the compiler.
I couldn't quite eliminate AbstractCC's information from AST function types, since SIL type lowering transiently created AnyFunctionTypes with AbstractCCs set, even though these never occur at the source level. To accommodate type lowering, allow AnyFunctionType::ExtInfo to carry a SILFunctionTypeRepresentation, and arrange for the overlapping representations to share raw values.
In order to avoid disturbing test output, AST and SILFunctionTypes are still printed and parsed using the existing @thin/@thick/@objc_block and @cc() attributes, which is kind of gross, but lets me stage in the real source-breaking change separately.
Swift SVN r27095
This is the new and improved version of
__attribute__((annotate("swift1_unavailable"))), with the "improved" being
specifically that the 'availability' attribute supports a message.
This requires a corresponding Clang commit.
Swift side of rdar://problem/18768673.
Swift SVN r27053
"Autoclosure" is uninteresting to SIL. "noescape" isn't currently used by SIL and we shouldn't have it until it has a meaningful effect on SIL. "throws" should be adequately represented by a SIL function type having an error result.
Swift SVN r27023
The set of attributes that make sense at the AST level is increasingly divergent from those at the SIL level, so it doesn't really make sense for these to be the same. It'll also help prevent us from accidental unwanted propagation of attributes from the AST to SIL, which has caused bugs in the past. For staging purposes, start off with SILFunctionType's versions exactly the same as the FunctionType versions, which necessitates some ugly glue code but minimizes the potential disruption.
Swift SVN r27022
Another step toward using the conformance lookup table for
everything. This uncovered a tricky little bug in the conformance
lookup table's filtering logic (when asking for only those
conformances explicitly specified within a particular context) that
would end up dropping non-explicit conformances from the table (rather
than just the result).
Ween a few tests off of -enable-source-import, because they'll break
otherwise.
Swift SVN r27021
Previously some parts of the compiler referred to them as "fields",
and most referred to them as "elements". Use the more generic 'elements'
nomenclature because that's what we refer to other things in the compiler
(e.g. the elements of a bracestmt).
At the same time, make the API better by providing "getElement" consistently
and using it, instead of getElements()[i].
NFC.
Swift SVN r26894
to represent them, and just dropped them on the ground. Now we parse them,
persist them in the AST, and "resolve" them from the expr grammar, but still
drop them on the ground. This is progress towards fixing: rdar://20135489
Swift SVN r26828
Flatten several nested loops that tried to take care of this into a single
outer loop-until-really-done loop.
No test case; this is a preventative measure, not a response to an actual bug.
Swift SVN r26823
...rather than re-emitting the conformance in the current file, and then
trying to cross-reference the decl context that owns the conformance, which
may be an extension.
rdar://problem/20383044
Swift SVN r26822
This patch introduces a new kind of pattern for matching bool literals, i.e. true and false. Essentially, it is very similar to a pattern for matching enum elements, but simpler. Most of the code is just a boiler plate code copy/pasted from the code for enum element patterns. The only different thing is the emitBoolDispatch function, which emits a SIL code for matching bools.
With this patch, we don't get any false non-exhaustive switch diagnostics for switches on bools anymore. And we have a lot of radars complaining about it. For example rdar://16514545 and rdar://20130240.
Note, that this patch fixes the non-exhaustive switch diagnostics without changing the internal representation of bools. Implementing bool as an enum would have the same effect when it comes to these diagnostics and we would get this diagnostics fix for free, i.e. without any code committed here. But implementing bools-as-enums is an ongoing work and I'm investigating its performance implications. If we become confident that bool-as-enum does not have a negative impact on performance and decide to merge it, then we can revert this patch as it would not be necessary anymore. But if we decide to skip the enum-as-bool approach to its performance issues, then we would have at least fixed the false non-exhaustive diagnostics for bools by means of this patch.
Swift SVN r26650
Rename 'assignment' attribute of infix operators to 'mutating'. Add
'has_assignment' attribute, which results in an implicit declaration of
the assignment version of the same operator. Parse "func =foo"
declaration and "foo.=bar" expression. Validate some basic properties of
in-place methods.
Not yet implemented: automatic generation of wrapper for =foo() if foo()
is implemented, or vice versa; likewise for operators.
Swift SVN r26508
Start allowing extensions to redeclare type parameters, which will get
different archetypes from the original nominal type. When an extension
does not redeclare type parameters, silently clone the nominal type's
generic type parameters so we still get distinct type parameters.
When deserializing an extension, wire up its generic parameter list so
we get the right archetypes for its members. This doesn't change the
module format (that happened earlier).
When determining the substitutions for an associated type that comes
from a different declaration context from the conformance that will
own the witness, be sure to map into the conformance's
DeclContext. Otherwise, we'll end up with tangled archetypes.
Fixes rdar://problem/16519588.
Swift SVN r26483
Primarily, unique normal protocol conformances and reference them via
a conformance ID. This eliminates the use of trailing records for
normal protocol conformances and (more importantly) the cases were we
would write incomplete conformances. The latter could cause problems
if we ever ended up deserializing an incomplete conformance without
also deserializing a complete record for that same conformance.
Secondarily, simplify the way we write conformances. They are now
always trailing records, and we separate out the derived conformance
kinds (specialized/inherited) from either a reference to a normal
conformance in the current module file (via a normal conformance ID)
or via a cross-reference to a conformance in another module file
(currently always a normal conformance, but this need not always be
the case). As part of this, make each conformance record
self-sustaining, so we don't have to push information down to the
reading routines (e.g., the conforming type) to actually produce a
proper conformance. This simplifies deserialization logic further.
Swift SVN r26482
Currently a no-op, but effective access for entities within the current
module will soon need to take testability into account. This declaration:
internal func foo() {}
has a formal access of 'internal', but an effective access of 'public' if
we're in a testable mode.
Part of rdar://problem/17732115 (testability)
Swift SVN r26472
Getting the protocols of an arbitrary type doesn't make sense, so start phasing this out by introducing specialized entry points that do make sense:
- get the inherited protocols of a ProtocolDecl
- get the conforming protocols for an associated type or generic
type parameter
- (already present) ask for the protocols to which a nominal type conforms
Swift SVN r26411
The lit and testsuite changes are hacks to work around the problems with the -enable-source-import model. Some day, we’ll get a “real” mock SDK with compiled overlays so these hacks can go away.
Swift SVN r26327
This lets us tag imported declarations with arbitrary synthesized
protocols. Use it to handle imported raw option sets as well as the
RawRepresentable conformances of enums that come in as structs.
Swift SVN r26298
This flag indicates that internal APIs within the module should be made
available to client code for testing purposes. Currently does nothing.
Not ready for developer consumption yet, ergo a hidden frontend-only flag.
Part of testability (rdar://problem/17732115)
Swift SVN r26292
Previously, a multi-pattern var/let decl like:
var x = 4, y = 17
would produce two pattern binding decls (one for x=4 one for y=17). This is convenient
in some ways, but is bad for source reproducibility from the ASTs (see, e.g. the improvements
in test/IDE/structure.swift and test/decl/inherit/initializer.swift).
The hardest part of this change was to get parseDeclVar to set up the AST in a way
compatible with our existing assumptions. I ended up with an approach that forms PBDs in
more erroneous cases than before. One downside of this is that we now produce a spurious
"type annotation missing in pattern"
diagnostic in some cases. I'll take care of that in a follow-on patch.
Swift SVN r26224
The deallocating parameter convention is a new convention put on a
non-trivial parameter if the caller function guarantees to the callee
that the parameter has the deallocating bit set in its object header.
This means that retains and releases do not need to be emitted on these
parameters even though they are non-trivial. This helps to solve a bug
in +0 self and makes it trivial for the optimizer to perform
optimizations based on this property.
It is not emitted yet by SILGen and will only be put on the self
argument of Deallocator functions.
Swift SVN r26179
This introduces a new pattern, spelled "x?" which is sugar for
matching ".Some(x)". It also changes the parser slightly so that
_ (the discard expr) is parsed as a unary expr instead of as an
expr. This allows it to have postfix ? after it, which is important
in pattern contexts to support "case _?:".
Swift SVN r25907
...rather than trying to serialize them again, which could lead to attempting
to cross-reference an ExtensionDecl, which can't be done.
rdar://problem/19794141
Swift SVN r25292
...so that the debugger has the best possible chance of being able to load
the app properly.
We don't do this for frameworks today because we don't want to leak this
information into the public module; once we have a distinction between
"the module that ships with the framework" and "the module that goes into
the debug info" we can do this for frameworks as well.
Part of rdar://problem/17670778
Swift SVN r25204
There were no clients and it leaks information about the developer's system.
After this commit, there should be no full paths present in framework modules.
(App modules may contain search paths for debugging reasons, as well as a
full or relative path to the bridging header.)
Swift SVN r24851
Local type declarations are saved in the source file during parsing,
now serialized as decls. Some of these may be defined in DeclContexts
which aren't Decls and previously weren't serialized. Create four new
record kinds:
* PatternBindingInitializer
* DefaultArgumentInitializer
* AbstractClosureExpr
* TopLevelCodeDecl
These new records are used to only preserve enough information for
remangling in the debugger, and parental context relationships.
Finally, provide a lookup API in the module to search by mangled name.
With the new remangling API, the debugging lifecycle for local types
should be complete.
The extra LOCAL_CONTEXT record will compressed back down in a
subsequent patch.
Swift SVN r24739
