`getValue` -> `value`
`getValueOr` -> `value_or`
`hasValue` -> `has_value`
`map` -> `transform`
The old API will be deprecated in the rebranch.
To avoid merge conflicts, use the new API already in the main branch.
rdar://102362022
Allow more than one macro plugin to introduce a macro with the same
name, and let the constraint solver figure out which one to call. Also
eliminates a potential use-after-free if we somehow find additional
compiler plugins to load after having expanded a macro.
This makes ClangImporter automatically conform C++ collection types to `Cxx.CxxRandomAccessCollection` protocol.
We consider a C++ sequence type to be a random access collection type its iterator conforms to `UnsafeCxxRandomAccessIterator`.
Type check user-defined macros plugins with user-provided type signatures.
Also, load plugin libraries with `RTLD_LOCAL` instead of `RTLD_GLOBAL` to prevent symbol collision between plugins. `llvm::sys::DynamicLibrary` only supports `RTLD_GLOBAL` so we use the plain `dlopen` instead. This does not work on Windows and needs to be fixed.
Friend PR: apple/swift-syntax#1042
This is the start of the removal of the C++ implementation of libSyntax
in favor of the new Swift Parser and Swift Syntax libraries. Now that
the Swift Parser has switched the SwiftSyntaxParser library over to
being a thin wrapper around the Swift Parser, there is no longer any
reason we need to retain any libSyntax infrastructure in the swift
compiler.
As a first step, delete the infrastructure that builds
lib_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser and convert any scripts that mention
it to instead mention the static mirror libraries. The --swiftsyntax
build-script flag has been retained and will now just execute the
SwiftSyntax and Swift Parser builds with the just-built tools.
Allow user-defined macros to be loaded from dynamic libraries and evaluated.
- Introduce a _CompilerPluginSupport module installed into the toolchain. Its `_CompilerPlugin` protocol acts as a stable interface between the compiler and user-defined macros.
- Introduce a `-load-plugin-library <path>` attribute which allows users to specify dynamic libraries to be loaded into the compiler.
A macro library must declare a public top-level computed property `public var allMacros: [Any.Type]` and be compiled to a dynamic library. The compiler will call the getter of this property to obtain and register all macros.
Known issues:
- We current do not have a way to strip out unnecessary symbols from the plugin dylib, i.e. produce a plugin library that does not contain SwiftSyntax symbols that will collide with the compiler itself.
- `MacroExpansionExpr`'s type is hard-coded as `(Int, String)`. It should instead be specified by the macro via protocol requirements such as `signature` and `genericSignature`. We need more protocol requirements in `_CompilerPlugin` to handle this.
- `dlopen` is not secure and is only for prototyping use here.
Friend PR: apple/swift-syntax#1022
Intro ASTContext::setIgnoreAdjacentModules to change module loading to
accept load only resilient modules from their swiftinterfaces, ignoring
the adjacent module and any silencing swiftinterfaces errors.
This makes ClangImporter automatically conform C++ sequence types to `Cxx.UnsafeCxxInputIterator` protocol.
We consider a C++ type to be a random access iterator type if conforms to `UnsafeCxxInputIterator`, and additionally defines `operator-` and `operator+=`.
Previously, when evaluating a `#if canImport(Module, _version: 42)` directive the compiler could diagnose and ignore the directive under the following conditions:
- The associated binary module is corrupt/bogus.
- The .tbd for an underlying Clang module is missing a current-version field.
This behavior is surprising when there is a valid `.swiftinterface` available and it only becomes apparent when building against an SDK with an old enough version of the module that the version in the `.swiftinterface` is too low, making this failure easy to miss. Some modules have different versioning systems for their Swift and Clang modules and it can also be intentional for a distributed binary `.swiftmodule` to contain bogus data (to force the compiler to recompile the `.swiftinterface`) so we need to handle both of these cases gracefully and predictably.
Now the compiler will enumerate all module loaders, ask each of them to attempt to parse the module version and then consistently use the parsed version from a single source. The `.swiftinterface` is preferred if present, then the binary module if present, and then finally the `.tbd`. The `.tbd` is still always used exclusively for the `_underlyingVersion` variant of `canImport()`.
Resolves rdar://88723492
These will never appear in the source language, but can arise
after substitution when the original type is a tuple type with
a pack expansion type.
Two examples:
- original type: (Int, T...), substitution T := {}
- original type: (T...), substitution T := {Int}
We need to model these correctly to maintain invariants.
Callers that previously used to rely on TupleType::get()
returning a ParenType now explicitly check for the one-element
case instead.
Even if we can't spell them in source, we want to model expansions where
the pattern does not depend on any pack type parameters, eg
func f<C...: Collection>(_ c: C...) {
let x = (c.count...)
}
Here, the type of 'x' is notionally 'Int * C.count'.
This makes ClangImporter automatically conform C++ sequence types to `Cxx.CxxSequence` protocol.
We consider a C++ type to be a sequence type if it defines `begin()` & `end()` methods that return iterators of the same type which conforms to `UnsafeCxxInputIterator`.
