We needed a way to describe an ABI-safe cast of an address
representing an LValue to implement `@preconcurrency` and
its injection of casts during accesses of members.
This new AST node, `ABISafeConversionExpr` models what is
essentially an `unchecked_addr_cast` in SIL when accessing
the LVAlue.
As of now I simply implemented it and the verification of
the node for the concurrency needs to ensure that it's not
misused by accident. If it finds use outside of that,
feel free to update the verifier.
The old syntax was
@opened("UUID") constraintType
Where constraintType was the right hand side of a conformance requirement.
This would always create an archetype where the interface type was `Self`,
so it couldn't cope with member types of opened existential types.
Member types of opened existential types is now a thing with SE-0309, so
this lack of support prevented writing SIL test cases using this feature.
The new syntax is
@opened("UUID", constraintType) interfaceType
The interfaceType is a type parameter rooted in an implicit `Self`
generic parameter, which is understood to be the underlying type of the
existential.
Fixes rdar://problem/93771238.
This was already enabled as part of `-enable-implicit-dynamic` but this
new flag allows turning on opaque type erasure all by itself whether or
not `dynamic` is added explicitly.
rdar://97375478
`@Sendable` on completion handlers imported from Objective-C has been
implemented for a while, but has been disabled in production builds
due to a number of problems we've encountered with rolling it out.
Introduce an experimental feature for `@Sendable` completion handlers
so we can iterate on this more before we enable it by default.
Part of rdar://85569247, which will cover re-landing this feature.
The new intrinsic, exposed via static functions on Task<T, Never> and
Task<T, Error> (rethrowing), begins an asynchronous context within a
synchronous caller's context. This is only available for use under the
task-to-thread concurrency model, and even then only under SPI.
Since I am beginning to prepare for adding real move only types to the language,
I am renaming everything that has to do with copyable types "move only wrapped"
values instead of move only. The hope is this reduces/prevents any confusion in
between the two.
Using the same feature set logic as experimental features, provide
feature names for "future" features, which are changes that will
become available with Swift 6. Use the feature check when determining
whether to implementation the feature instead of a language version
check, and map existing flags for these features (when available) over
to the feature set.
As an internal implementation detail, this makes it easier to reason
about when specific features are enabled (or not). If we decide to go
with piecemeal adoption support for features, it can provide an
alternative path to enabling features that feeds this mechanism.
Experimental features can only be enabled in non-production (+Asserts)
builds. They can be detected with `hasFeature` in the same manner as
"future" features.
The `-enable-experimental-feature X` flag will also look for future
features by that name, so that when an experimental feature becomes an
accepted future feature, it will still be enabled in the same manner.
Switch variadic generics over to this approach, eliminating the
specific LangOption for it.
* InterfaceGen reports a primary associated type as a reference to the
'associatedtype' declaration
* CursorInfo on a primary associated type returns information of the
'associatedtype' declaration
rdar://93275458
If we have an internal function with a `_specialize` attribute that has
a `targetFunction:` parameter we want the function to appear in the
.swiftinterface file such that the exported specialization can be picked up by
the compiler.
