The variants are produced by SILGen when opaque values are enabled.
They are necessary because otherwise SILGen would produce
address_to_pointer of values.
They will be lowered by AddressLowering.
This is the start of the removal of the C++ implementation of libSyntax
in favor of the new Swift Parser and Swift Syntax libraries. Now that
the Swift Parser has switched the SwiftSyntaxParser library over to
being a thin wrapper around the Swift Parser, there is no longer any
reason we need to retain any libSyntax infrastructure in the swift
compiler.
As a first step, delete the infrastructure that builds
lib_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser and convert any scripts that mention
it to instead mention the static mirror libraries. The --swiftsyntax
build-script flag has been retained and will now just execute the
SwiftSyntax and Swift Parser builds with the just-built tools.
This is a dedicated instruction for incrementing a
profiler counter, which lowers to the
`llvm.instrprof.increment` intrinsic. This
replaces the builtin instruction that was
previously used, and ensures that its arguments
are statically known. This ensures that SIL
optimization passes do not invalidate the
instruction, fixing some code coverage cases in
`-O`.
rdar://39146527
By using the keyword instead of the function, we actually get a much simpler
implementation since we avoid all of the machinery of SILGenApply. Given that we
are going down that path, I am removing the old builtin implementation since it
is dead code.
The reason why I am removing this now is that in a subsequent commit, I want to
move all of the ownership checking passes to run /before/ mandatory inlining. I
originally placed the passes after mandatory inlining since the function version
of the move keyword was transparent and needing to be inlined before we could
process it. Since we use the keyword now, that is no longer an issue.
The new intrinsic, exposed via static functions on Task<T, Never> and
Task<T, Error> (rethrowing), begins an asynchronous context within a
synchronous caller's context. This is only available for use under the
task-to-thread concurrency model, and even then only under SPI.
Required for UnsafeRawPointer.withMemoryReboud(to:).
%out_token = rebind_memory %0 : $Builtin.RawPointer to %in_token
%0 must be of $Builtin.RawPointer type
%in_token represents a cached set of bound types from a prior memory state.
%out_token is an opaque $Builtin.Word representing the previously bound
types for this memory region.
This instruction's semantics are identical to ``bind_memory``, except
that the types to which memory will be bound, and the extent of the
memory region is unknown at compile time. Instead, the bound-types are
represented by a token that was produced by a prior memory binding
operation. ``%in_token`` must be the result of bind_memory or
Required for UnsafeRawPointer.withMemoryRebound(to:)
%token = bind_memory %0 : $Builtin.RawPointer, %1 : $Builtin.Word to $T
%0 must be of $Builtin.RawPointer type
%1 must be of $Builtin.Word type
%token is an opaque $Builtin.Word representing the previously bound types
for this memory region.
The key thing is that the move checker will not consider the explicit copy value
to be a copy_value that can be rewritten, ensuring that any uses of the result
of the explicit copy_value (consuming or other wise) are not checked.
Similar to the _move operator I recently introduced, this is a transparent
function so we can perform one level of specialization and thus at least be
generic over all concrete types.
This patch introduces a new stdlib function called _move:
```Swift
@_alwaysEmitIntoClient
@_transparent
@_semantics("lifetimemanagement.move")
public func _move<T>(_ value: __owned T) -> T {
#if $ExperimentalMoveOnly
Builtin.move(value)
#else
value
#endif
}
```
It is a first attempt at creating a "move" function for Swift, albeit a skleton
one since we do not yet perform the "no use after move" analysis. But this at
leasts gets the skeleton into place so we can built the analysis on top of it
and churn tree in a manageable way. Thus in its current incarnation, all it does
is take in an __owned +1 parameter and returns it after moving it through
Builtin.move.
Given that we want to use an OSSA based analysis for our "no use after move"
analysis and we do not have opaque values yet, we can not supporting moving
generic values since they are address only. This has stymied us in the past from
creating this function. With the implementation in this PR via a bit of
cleverness, we are now able to support this as a generic function over all
concrete types by being a little clever.
The trick is that when we transparent inline _move (to get the builtin), we
perform one level of specialization causing the inlined Builtin.move to be of a
loadable type. If after transparent inlining, we inline builtin "move" into a
context where it is still address only, we emit a diagnostic telling the user
that they applied move to a generic or existential and that this is not yet
supported.
The reason why we are taking this approach is that we wish to use this to
implement a new (as yet unwritten) diagnostic pass that verifies that _move
(even for non-trivial copyable values) ends the lifetime of the value. This will
ensure that one can write the following code to reliably end the lifetime of a
let binding in Swift:
```Swift
let x = Klass()
let _ = _move(x)
// hypotheticalUse(x)
```
Without the diagnostic pass, if one were to write another hypothetical use of x
after the _move, the compiler would copy x to at least hypotheticalUse(x)
meaning the lifetime of x would not end at the _move, =><=.
So to implement this diagnostic pass, we want to use the OSSA infrastructure and
that only works on objects! So how do we square this circle: by taking advantage
of the mandatory SIL optimzier pipeline! Specifically we take advantage of the
following:
1. Mandatory Inlining and Predictable Dead Allocation Elimination run before any
of the move only diagnostic passes that we run.
2. Mandatory Inlining is able to specialize a callee a single level when it
inlines code. One can take advantage of this to even at -Onone to
monomorphosize code.
and then note that _move is such a simple function that predictable dead
allocation elimination is able to without issue eliminate the extra alloc_stack
that appear in the caller after inlining without issue. So we (as the tests
show) get SIL that for concrete types looks exactly like we just had run a
move_value for that specific type as an object since we promote away the
stores/loads in favor of object operations when we eliminate the allocation.
In order to prevent any issue with this being used in a context where multiple
specializations may occur, I made the inliner emit a diagnostic if it inlines
_move into a function that applies it to an address only value. The diagnostic
is emitted at the source location where the function call occurs so it is easy
to find, e.x.:
```
func addressOnlyMove<T>(t: T) -> T {
_move(t) // expected-error {{move() used on a generic or existential value}}
}
moveonly_builtin_generic_failure.swift:12:5: error: move() used on a generic or existential value
_move(t)
^
```
To eliminate any potential ABI impact, if someone calls _move in a way that
causes it to be used in a context where the transparent inliner will not inline
it, I taught IRGen that Builtin.move is equivalent to a take from src -> dst and
marked _move as always emit into client (AEIC). I also took advantage of the
feature flag I added in the previous commit in order to prevent any cond_fails
from exposing Builtin.move in the stdlib. If one does not pass in the flag
-enable-experimental-move-only then the function just returns the value without
calling Builtin.move, so we are safe.
rdar://83957028
Adds two new IRGen-level builtins (one for allocating, the other for deallocating), a stdlib shim function for enhanced stack-promotion heuristics, and the proposed public stdlib functions.
