Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
Create some test cases that demonstrate MemberImportVisibility behavior with respect referencing inherited members. There are already tests that demonstrate overrides, but nothing seemed to show the behavior when referencing an inherted member through a derived type. I wanted to verify this behavior so I wrote a test to demonstrate it. It seems reasonable to check-in the test to ensure the behavior remains consistent.
Previously, the constraint solver would first attempt member lookup that
excluded members from transitively imported modules. If there were no viable
candidates, it would perform a second lookup that included the previously
excluded members, treating any candidates as unviable. This meant that if the
member reference did resolve to one of the unviable candidates the resulting
AST would be broken, which could cause unwanted knock-on diagnostics.
Now, members from transitively imported modules are always returned in the set
of viable candidates. However, scoring will always prioritize candidates from
directly imported modules over members from transitive imports. This solves the
ambiguities that `MemberImportVisibility` is designed to prevent. If the only
viable candidates are from transitively imported modules, though, then the
reference will be resolved successfully and diagnosed later in
`MiscDiagnostics.cpp`. The resulting AST will not contain any errors, which
ensures that necessary access levels can be computed correctly for the imports
suggested by `MemberImportVisibility` fix-its.
Resolves rdar://126637855.
If `OverriddenDeclsRequest` fails to find any overridden declarations, query
again ignoring missing imports to find declarations that were excluded due to the
`MemberImportVisibility` feature being enabled.
Some editors use diagnostics from SourceKit to replace build issues. This causes issues if the diagnostics from SourceKit are formatted differently than the build issues. Make sure they are rendered the same way, removing most uses of `DiagnosticsEditorMode`.
To do so, always emit the `add stubs for conformance` note (which previously was only emitted in editor mode) and remove all `; add <something>` suffixes from notes that state which requirements are missing.
rdar://129283608
When emitting fix-its for missing imports, include an access level when the
module has been imported with an access level in other source files. For now,
the suggested access level for will always be `internal`, even when uses of
members in the file would actually require `public` or `package` visibility. In
order to suggest the correct access level, name lookup will need to be
refactored to repair references to inaccessible declarations, instead of
leaving error nodes in the AST. In anticipation of that refactoring of name
lookup, missing import diagnostics are now delayed until type checking a source
file is finished so that a consistent access level can be suggested for each
import fix-it for a given module.
Partially resolves rdar://126637855.
In existing Swift, an `@_exported import` in any source file makes the
declarations from the imported module visible in all source files. It's unclear
whether this is an explicit decision or is simply and unintended consequence of
effectively adding an implicit import to each source file for the module being
compiled.
Although it's not clear whether this behavior is desirable, the behavior of
member lookup when the MemberImportVisibility feature is enabled should align
with it in order to avoid causing unnecessary churn in required imports.
Resolves rdar://132525152.
Control enforcement of member import visibility requirements via a new option,
instead of piggy-backing on the existing IgnoreAccessControl option. Adopt the
option when doing fallback lookups for unviable members so that the compiler
can diagnose the reason that a member is inaccessible more reliably.
Previously, with MemberImportVisibility enabled decls with the package access
level could be mis-diagnosed as inaccessible due to their access level when
really they were inaccessible due to a missing import.
Resolves rdar://131501862.
