Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
Previously, the checker inserted destroys after each last use. Here,
extend the lifetimes of fields as far as possible within their original
(unchecked) limits.
rdar://99681073
Some notes:
1. I put in both a swiftpm like test case and a library evolution test case. I
also updated the moveonly_deinit serialization swift test to show that we
actually serialize the deinit.
2. I changed when we emit the deinit table to only be when we have a type with
an actual value type destructor. Notably this doesn't include classes today so
as a side-effect, we no longer attempt to devirtualize moveonly class deinits.
This doesn't affect anything we are trying to actually do since we do not
support noncopyable classes today. With that in mind, I changed one test that
was showing that deinit devirtualization worked to use a struct with deinit
instead of a class.
rdar://109679168
These are the same semantically, just the mangling is slightly different. The
benefit of doing this is that we are actually testing what we expect our users
to do.
rdar://108511703
the main things still left behind the experimental flag(s) are
- move-only classes (guarded by MoveOnlyClasses feature)
- noimplicitcopy
- the _borrow operator
Some notes:
1. This ensures that if we capture them, we just capture the box by reference.
2. We are still using the old incorrect semantics for captures. I am doing this
so I can bring this up in separate easy to understand patches all of which
pass all of the moveonly tests.
3. Most of the test edits are due to small differences in error messages in
between the object and address checker.
4. I had to add a little support to the move only address checker for a small
pattern that doesn't occur with vars but do es occur for lets when we codegen
like this, specifically around enums. The pattern is we perform a load_borrow
and then copy_value and then use the result of the copy_value. Rather than fight
SILGen pattern I introduced a small canonicalization into the address checker which
transforms that pattern into a load [copy] + begin_borrow to restore the codegen
to a pattern the checker expects.
5. I left noimplicitcopy alone for now. But we should come back around and fix
it in a similar way. I just did not have time to do so.
A lot of existing regression tests rely on there
being some form of move-only classes, despite
them being something that will not be available
to users (and not complete).
This change introduces a `MoveOnlyClasses`
experimental feature so that those tests don't
need to be fully rewritten just yet. You need to
include `-enable-experimental-feature MoveOnlyClasses` along with
`-enable-experimental-move-only` to get move-only classes.
To improve the debugging experience of values whose lifetimes are
canonicalized without compromising the semantics expressed in the source
language, when canonicalizing OSSA lifetimes at Onone, lengthen
lifetimes as much as possible without incurring copies that would be
eliminated at O.
rdar://99618502
