Avoid heap-allocating an immortal FunctionTest with `new` because it
results in LSAN reporting a leak.
In fact, the "leaked" value wasn't leaked: a reference to it was stored
in a global map when the type's constructor ran. It was only a leak in
the sense that it was never freed, not that there was a dangling
allocation which couldn't be freed.
Work around this by storing the global instances themselves in a second
static structure. Store pointers to the instances into the global map
as before.
rdar://118134637
Introduce two modes of bridging:
* inline mode: this is basically how it worked so far. Using full C++ interop which allows bridging functions to be inlined.
* pure mode: bridging functions are not inlined but compiled in a cpp file. This allows to reduce the C++ interop requirements to a minimum. No std/llvm/swift headers are imported.
This change requires a major refactoring of bridging sources. The implementation of bridging functions go to two separate files: SILBridgingImpl.h and OptimizerBridgingImpl.h.
Depending on the mode, those files are either included in the corresponding header files (inline mode), or included in the c++ file (pure mode).
The mode can be selected with the BRIDGING_MODE cmake variable. By default it is set to the inline mode (= existing behavior). The pure mode is only selected in certain configurations to work around C++ interop issues:
* In debug builds, to workaround a problem with LLDB's `po` command (rdar://115770255).
* On windows to workaround a build problem.
At the cost of adding an unsafe bitcast implementation detail,
simplified the code involved to register a new FunctionTest when adding
one.
Also simplifies how Swift native `FunctionTest`s are registered with the
C++ registry.
Now, the to-be-executed thin closure for native Swift `FunctionTest`s is
stored under within the swift::test::FunctionTest instance corresponding
to it. Because its type isn't representable in C++, `void *` is used
instead. When the FunctionTest is invoked, a thunk is called which
takes the actual test function and bridged versions of the arguments.
That thunk unwraps the arguments, casts the stored function to the
appropriate type, and invokes it.
Thanks to Andrew Trick for the idea.
All SILArgument types are "block arguments". There are three kinds:
1. Function arguments
2. Phis
3. Terminator results
In every situation where the source of the block argument matters, we
need to distinguish between these three. Accidentally failing to
handle one of the cases is an perpetual source of compiler
bugs. Attempting to handle both phis and terminator results uniformly
is *always* a bug, especially once OSSA has phi flags. Even when all
cases are handled correctly, the code that deals with data flow across
blocks is incomprehensible without giving each case a type. This
continues to be a massive waste of time literally every time I review
code that involves cross-block control flow.
Unfortunately, we don't have these C++ types yet (nothing big is
blocking that, it just wasn't done). That's manageable because we can
use wrapper types on the Swift side for now. Wrapper types don't
create any more complexity than protocols, but they do sacrifice some
usability in switch cases.
There is no reason for a BlockArgument type. First, a function
argument is a block argument just as much as any other. BlockArgument
provides no useful information beyond Argument. And it is nearly
always a mistake to care about whether a value is a function argument
and not care whether it is a phi or terminator result.
Before this change, if a global variable is required to be statically initialized (e.g. due to @_section attribute), we don't allow its type to be a struct, only a scalar type works. This change improves on that by teaching MandatoryPerformanceOptimizations pass to inline struct initializer calls into initializer of globals, as long as they are simple enough so that we can be sure that we don't trigger recursive/infinite inlining.
A type (mostly classes) can be attributed with `@_semantics("arc.immortal")`.
ARC operations on values of such types are eliminated.
This is useful for the bridged SIL objects in the swift compiler sources.
Instead of doing the type casts and/or conformance lookup on the swift side, do it on the C++ side.
It makes a significant performance difference because `Operand.value` is a time critical function
The instance type of a metatype instruction is not necessarily a legal lowered SIL Type.
Lower the type before converting it to a SILType.
rdar://105502403
This instruction can be inserted by Onone optimizations as a replacement for deleted instructions to
ensure that it's possible to single step on its location.
- SILPackType carries whether the elements are stored directly
in the pack, which we're not currently using in the lowering,
but it's probably something we'll want in the final ABI.
Having this also makes it clear that we're doing the right
thing with substitution and element lowering. I also toyed
with making this a scalar type, which made it necessary in
various places, although eventually I pulled back to the
design where we always use packs as addresses.
- Pack boundaries are a core ABI concept, so the lowering has
to wrap parameter pack expansions up as packs. There are huge
unimplemented holes here where the abstraction pattern will
need to tell us how many elements to gather into the pack,
but a naive approach is good enough to get things off the
ground.
- Pack conventions are related to the existing parameter and
result conventions, but they're different on enough grounds
that they deserve to be separated.
