This fixes an issue where the debug locations for Swift traps were dropped in the produced PDB files, as they were pointing to line 0
I validated this on a sample project using WinDbgx, which can now correctly trap on the same line in multiple places
This patch replaces the stateful generation of SILScope information in
SILGenFunction with data derived from the ASTScope hierarchy, which should be
100% in sync with the scopes needed for local variables. The goal is to
eliminate the surprising effects that the stack of cleanup operations can have
on the current state of SILBuilder leading to a fully deterministic (in the
sense of: predictible by a human) association of SILDebugScopes with
SILInstructions. The patch also eliminates the need to many workarounds. There
are still some accomodations for several Sema transformation passes such as
ResultBuilders, which don't correctly update the source locations when moving
around nodes. If these were implemented as macros, this problem would disappear.
This necessary rewrite of the macro scope handling included in this patch also
adds proper support nested macro expansions.
This fixes
rdar://88274783
and either fixes or at least partially addresses the following:
rdar://89252827
rdar://105186946
rdar://105757810
rdar://105997826
rdar://105102288
The implementation was done quite a while ago.
Now, that we have support in lldb (https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/773), we can enable it by default in the compiler.
LLDB now shows the runtime failure reason, for example:
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Swift runtime failure: arithmetic overflow
frame #1: 0x0000000100000f0d a.out`testit(a=127) at trap_message.swift:4
1
2 @inline(never)
3 func testit(_ a: Int8) -> Int8 {
-> 4 return a + 1
5 }
6
For details, see https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/25978
rdar://problem/51278690
To display a failure message in the debugger, create a function in the debug info which has the name of the failure message.
The debug location of the trap/cond_fail is then wrapped into this function and the function is declared as "inlined".
In case the debugger stops at the trap instruction, it displays the inline function, which looks like the failure message.
For example:
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION (code=EXC_I386_INVOP, subcode=0x0)
frame #0: 0x0000000100000cbf a.out`testit3(_:) [inlined] Unexpectedly found nil while unwrapping an Optional value at test.swift:14:11 [opt]
11
12 @inline(never)
13 func testit(_ a: Int?) -> Int {
-> 14 return a!
15 }
16
This change is currently not enabled by default, but can be enabled with the option "-Xllvm -enable-trap-debug-info".
Enabling this feature needs some changes in lldb. When the lldb part is done, this option can be removed and the feature enabled by default.
The SIL generation for this builtin also changes: instead of generating the cond_fail instructions upfront, let the optimizer generate it, if the operand is a static string literal.
In worst case, if the second operand is not a static string literal, the Builtin.condfail is lowered at the end of the optimization pipeline with a default message: "unknown program error".
To display a failure message in the debugger, create a function in the debug info which has the name of the failure message.
The debug location of the trap/cond_fail is then wrapped into this function and the function is declared as "inlined".
In case the debugger stops at the trap instruction, it displays the inline function, which looks like the failure message.
For example:
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION (code=EXC_I386_INVOP, subcode=0x0)
frame #0: 0x0000000100000cbf a.out`testit3(_:) [inlined] Unexpectedly found nil while unwrapping an Optional value at test.swift:14:11 [opt]
11
12 @inline(never)
13 func testit(_ a: Int?) -> Int {
-> 14 return a!
15 }
16
This change is currently not enabled by default, but can be enabled with the option "-Xllvm -enable-trap-debug-info".
Enabling this feature needs some changes in lldb. When the lldb part is done, this option can be removed and the feature enabled by default.
The SIL generation for this builtin also changes: instead of generating the cond_fail instructions upfront, let the optimizer generate it, if the operand is a static string literal.
In worst case, if the second operand is not a static string literal, the Builtin.condfail is lowered at the end of the optimization pipeline with a default message: "unknown program error".
LLVM r356789 changed the format of textual IR to print nameless
blocks with labels instead of comments with "; <label>". Adjust Swift
tests to match. I also updated the utils/viewcfg script to match.
Summary:
CodeView does not recognize zero as an artificial line location
and so a line location of zero causes unexpected behavior when
stepping through user code. If we find a line location of zero
and our scope has not changed, we use the most recent debug
location. That is expected to be the user code that most likely
relates to the current instruction and is similar to the behavior
in LLDB.
Test Plan:
test/DebugInfo/linetable-codeview.swift
Summary:
CodeView does not recognize zero as an artificial line location
and so a line location of zero causes unexpected behavior when
stepping through user code. If we find a line location of zero
and our scope has not changed, we use the most recent debug
location. That is expected to be the user code that most likely
relates to the current instruction and is similar to the behavior
in LLDB.
Test Plan:
test/DebugInfo/linetable-codeview.swift
Summary:
There are a few problems with how Swift currently emits location
information for CodeView.
1. WinDbg does not work well with column information so all column
locations must be set to zero.
2. Some instructions, e.g., ``a + b``, will emit ``@llvm.trap()``
and ``unreachable``. Those instructions should have artificial
locations, i.e., they should have a line location of zero.
3. Some instructions, e.g., ``a / b``, will emit ``unreachable``
sandwiched between other code for that instruction. This makes
WinDbg confused and it cannot decide which set of instructions
to break on. Those instructions should have the same line location
as the others.
4. There are several prologue instructions with artificial line
locations that create breaks in the linetables. Those instructions
should have valid line locations, usually at the start of the
function.
5. Case bodies have cleanup instructions with artificial line
locations unless it has a ``do`` block. Those locations should
be the last line in the case block.
Test Plan:
test/DebugInfo/basic.swift
test/DebugInfo/columns.swift
test/DebugInfo/linetable-codeview.swift
test/DebugInfo/line-directive-codeview.swift
