When building a curry thunk for unapplied references to instance
methods, the type checker would build a CallExpr rather than a
DotSyntaxCallExpr to work around various issues with source locations.
Fix the underlying issues with source locations in DotSyntaxCallExpr
so we can consistently build DotSyntaxCallExpr here, and assert that
we don't do this again:
* DotSyntaxCallExpr wasn't able to reason about having just one of its
children having source location information; fix it.
* @dynamicCallable support was passing the declaration source location
for the call expression, which was nowhere in the expression itself.
The above mistake was covering for this one.
We'll need this to get the right 'selfDC' when name lookup
finds a 'self' declaration in a capture list, eg
class C {
func bar() {}
func foo() {
_ = { [self] in bar() }
}
}
Generally, casting consistency demands that we be able
to extract anything from an existential that can be put
into that existential. (Which is why the casting spec
requires that casting permit arbitrary injection and
projection of optionals.)
This particular diagnostic prevented optionals from being
projected back out of existentials:
let i: Int?
let a: Any = i // Inject Int? into Any
// Error prevents projecting Int? back out of Any
a as? Int?
This also broke certain uses of Mirror (weak variables get reflected as
optionals stored in Any existentials).
Rather than trying to include each expression kind, which leaves us
open to errors of omission, exclude only the case where we don't record
locators for trailing closure directions.
The introduction of forward-scan matching for trailing closures
(SE-0286) failed to account for unresolved member expressions,
sometimes causing a crash in SILGen. Fixes rdar://problem/67781123.
Introduce a new expression type for representing the result of an unresolved member chain. Use this expression type instead of an implicit ParenExpr for giving unresolved member chain result types representation in the AST during type checking.
In order to give unresolved member chain result types visibility in the AST, we inject an implicit ParenExpr in CSGen that lives only for the duration of type checking, and gets removed during solution application.
Remove the tracking of unresolved base types from the constraint system, and place it entirely within the generation phase. We have other ways of getting at the base types after generation.
when we have an optional type. This uncovered an error with unresolved member lookup where we allowed an unresolved value member constraint to fail if lookup failed in an optional type wrapping a type variable.
This resolves SR-13357.
Unlike \keypath expressions, only the property components of #keypath
expressions were being resolved, so index wouldn't pick up references for their
qualifying types.
Also fixes a code completion bug where it was reporting members from the Swift
rather than ObjC side of bridged types.
Resolves rdar://problem/61573935
bindSwitchCasePatternVars() was introduced as a simpler way to wire up
the "parent" links for case variables with same-named case variables
from the previous case item, and is used in the function builders code
to handle switch statements. It duplicated some logic from the
statement checker that did the same thing using a more complicated
algorithm.
Switch (ha ha) the logic in the statement checker over to using
bindSwitchCasePatternVars(), fixing a bug involving unresolved
patterns along the way, and remove the old code that incrementally
wired up the parent links. The resulting code is simpler and is
unified across the various code paths.
Unlike \keypath expressions, only the property components of #keypath
expressions were being resolved, so index wouldn't pick up references for their
qualifying types.
Also fixes a code completion bug where it was reporting members from the Swift
rather than ObjC side of bridged types.
Resolves rdar://problem/61573935
Since the two ExtInfos share a common ClangTypeInfo, and C++ doesn't let us
forward declare nested classes, we need to hoist out AnyFunctionType::ExtInfo
and SILFunctionType::ExtInfo to the top-level.
We also add some convenience APIs on (AST|SIL)ExtInfo for frequently used
withXYZ methods. Note that all non-default construction still goes through the
builder's build() method.
We do not add any checks for invariants here; those will be added later.
Rather than type-checking captures as separate declarations during
pre-check, generate constraints and apply solutions to captures in
the same manner as other pattern bindings within a constraint
system.
Fixes SR-3186 / rdar://problem/64647232.
Introduce 'TypeCheckSingleASTNode' mode that only type checks single body
element and dependent necessities (i.e. referencing ValueDecls and their
dependencies).
Renamed swift::typeCheckAbstractFunctionBodyAtLoc() to
swift::typeCheckASTNodeAtLoc(DeclContext *, SourceLoc). That type checks
innermost 'ASTNode' at the location. Also, 'TypeCheckSingleASTNode' mode
skips type checking any "body" of the node (i.e. BraceStmt elements for
function body, if statement body, closure body, etc.)
Added on-demand type checking using it:
- VarDecl in TapExpr
- ParamDecl in ClosureExpr
- Return type of ClosureExpr
- Binding value in control statements
(e.g. ForEachStmt, SwitchStmt, DoCatchStmt, etc.)
rdar://problem/63932852
With the constraint solver preferring backward scanning to forward
scanning, there is no need to point out the ambiguity: we will
always, consistently warn about backward scanning when it produced a
result that was different from the forward scan.
Whenever we form a call that relies on the deprecated "backward" scan,
produce a warning to note the deprecation along with a Fix-It to label
the parameter appropriately (and suppress the warning). For example:
warning: backward matching of the unlabeled trailing closure is
deprecated; label the argument with 'g' to suppress this warning
trailingClosureEitherDirection { $0 * $1 }
^
(g: )
To better preserve source compatibility, teach the constraint
solver to try both the new forward scanning rule as well as the
backward scanning rule when matching a single, unlabeled trailing
closure. In the extreme case, where the unlabeled trailing closure
matches different parameters with the different rules, and yet both
produce a potential match, introduce a disjunction to explore both
possibilities.
Prefer solutions that involve forward scans to those that involve
backward scans, so we only use the backward scan as a fallback.
