Actor classes never have non-actor superclasses, so we can ensure that
all actor classes have a common vtable prefix for the
`enqueue(partialTask:)` operation. This allows us to treat all actor
classes uniformly, without having to go through the Actor witness
table every time.
Introduce a new Actor protocol, which is a class-bound protocol with only
one requirement:
func enqueue(partialTask: PartialAsyncTask)
All actor classes implicitly conform to this protocol, and will synthesize
a (currently empty) definition of `enqueue(partialTask:)` unless a suitable
one is provided explicitly.
We'll need this to get the right 'selfDC' when name lookup
finds a 'self' declaration in a capture list, eg
class C {
func bar() {}
func foo() {
_ = { [self] in bar() }
}
}
Mention the type, the requirement, and the extension in the error that
follows. In editor mode, try to insert stubs for the missing requirement
as well so the user isn't just left with a pile of unactionable errors.
VarPattern is today used to implement both 'let' and 'var' pattern bindings, so
today is already misleading. The reason why the name Var was chosen was done b/c
it is meant to represent a pattern that performs 'variable binding'. Given that
I am going to add a new 'inout' pattern binding to this, it makes sense to
give it now a better fitting name before I make things more confusing.
`Differentiable` conformance derivation now supports
`Differentiable.zeroTangentVectorInitializer`.
There are two potential cases:
1. Memberwise derivation: done when `TangentVector` can be initialized memberwise.
2. `{ TangentVector.zero }` derivation: done as a fallback.
`zeroTangentVectorInitializer` is a closure that produces a zero tangent vector,
capturing minimal necessary information from `self`.
It is an instance property, unlike the static property `AdditiveArithmetic.zero`,
and should be used by the differentiation transform for correctness.
Remove `Differentiable.zeroTangentVectorInitializer` dummy default implementation.
Update stdlib `Differentiable` conformances and tests.
Clean up DerivedConformanceDifferentiable.cpp cruft.
Resolves TF-1007.
Progress towards TF-1008: differentiation correctness for projection operations.
All callers can trivially be refactored to use ModuleDecl::lookupConformance()
instead. Since this was the last flag in ConformanceCheckOptions, we can remove
that, too.
Like switch cases, a catch clause may now include a comma-
separated list of patterns. The body will be executed if any
one of those patterns is matched.
This patch replaces `CatchStmt` with `CaseStmt` as the children
of `DoCatchStmt` in the AST. This necessitates a number of changes
throughout the compiler, including:
- Parser & libsyntax support for the new syntax and AST structure
- Typechecking of multi-pattern catches, including those which
contain bindings.
- SILGen support
- Code completion updates
- Profiler updates
- Name lookup changes
Add `AdditiveArithmetic` derived conformances for structs and classes, gated by
the `-enable-experimental-differentiable-programming` flag.
Structs and classes whose stored properties all conform to `Differentiable` can
derive `Differentiable`:
- `associatedtype TangentVector: Differentiable & AdditiveArithmetic`
- Member `TangentVector` structs are synthesized whose stored properties are
all `var` stored properties that conform to `Differentiable` and that are
not `@noDerivative`.
- `mutating func move(along: TangentVector)`
The `@noDerivative` attribute may be declared on stored properties to opt out of
inclusion in synthesized `TangentVector` structs.
Some stored properties cannot be used in `TangentVector` struct synthesis and
are implicitly marked as `@noDerivative`, with a warning:
- `let` stored properties.
- These cannot be updated by `mutating func move(along: TangentVector)`.
- Non-`Differentiable`-conforming stored properties.
`@noDerivative` also implies `@_semantics("autodiff.nonvarying")`, which is
relevant for differentiable activity analysis.
Add type-checking and SILGen tests.
Resolves TF-845.
Add `AdditiveArithmetic` derived conformances for structs, gated by the
`-enable-experimential-additive-arithmetic-derivation` flag.
Structs whose stored properties all conform to `AdditiveArithmetic` can derive
`AdditiveArithmetic`:
- `static var zero: Self`
- `static func +(lhs: Self, rhs: Self) -> Self`
- `static func -(lhs: Self, rhs: Self) -> Self`
- An "effective memberwise initializer":
- Either a synthesized memberwise initializer or a user-defined initializer
with the same type.
Effective memberwise initializers are used only by derived conformances for
`Self`-returning protocol requirements like `AdditiveArithmetic.+`, which
require memberwise initialization.
Resolves TF-844.
Unblocks TF-845: upstream `Differentiable` derived conformances.
The error recovery logic around derived conformances is a little bit
tricky. Make sure we don't crash if a type explicitly provides a
RawValue type witness that is not equatable, but omits the witnesses
for init(rawValue:) and the rawValue property.
Fixes <rdar://problem/58127114>.
Hashable doesn't quite have the know-how to reject invalid derivation contexts before hand. Give it a little help by adding a way to retrieve if a decl added to the conformance context was invalid after type checking completes. Otherwise we'll emit "Hashable is broken".
This used to be a lot more relevant a long time ago when typeCheckFunctionsAndExternalDecls actually did type check external functions defined in C. Now, it serves no purpose.
The validation order change from just type checking these things eagerly doesn't seem to affect anything.
ProtocolConformanceRef already has an invalid state. Drop all of the
uses of Optional<ProtocolConformanceRef> and just use
ProtocolConformanceRef::forInvalid() to represent it. Mechanically
translate all of the callers and callsites to use this new
representation.
The only place this was used in Decl.h was the failability kind of a
constructor.
I decided to replace this with a boolean isFailable() bit. Now that
we have isImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional(), it seems to make more sense
to not have ConstructorDecl represent redundant information which
might not be internally consistent.
Most callers of getFailability() actually only care if the result is
failable or not; the few callers that care about it being IUO can
check isImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional() as well.
Implicit accessors are sometimes transparent for performance reasons.
Previously this was done in Sema by maybeMarkTransparent(), which would
add a TransparentAttr. Replace this with a request.
