If a unit test is miswritten in the sense that the test expects an
instance of one type by an instance of some other type is specified,
print that out.
Made bare @instruction and @block more useful. Rather than referring to
the first instruction and block in the current function, instead, they
now refer to the instruction after the test_specification instruction
(which must always exist) and the block containing the
test_specification instruction.
The testing works by way of a new pass "UnitTestRunner" and a new
instruction test_specification. When a function contains
test_specification instructions, it invokes the UnitTest subclass named
in the test_specification instruction with the arguments specified in
that instruction.
For example, when running the unit-test-runner class, having the
instructions
```
test_specification "my-neato-utility 19 @function[callee].block[2] @trace[2]"
test_specification "my-neato-utility 43 @block @trace"
```
would result in the test associated with "my-neato-utility" in
UnitTestRunner.cpp being invoked twice. Once with (19, aBlock, aValue),
and once with (43, anotherBlock, someOtherValue). That UnitTest
subclass class would need to call takeUInt, takeBlock, and takeTrace on
the Arguments struct it is invoked with. It would then pass those
arguments along to myNeatoUtility and dump out interesting results. The
results would then be FileChecked.
