@objc methods, initializers, deinitializers, properties, and
subscripts all produce Objective-C methods. Diagnose cases where two
such entities (which may be of different kinds) produce the same
Objective-C method in the same class.
As a special exception, one can have an Objective-C method in an
extension that conflicts with an Objective-C method in the original
class definition, so long as the original class definition is from a
different model. This reflects the reality in Objective-C that the
category definition wins over the original definition, and is used in
at least one overlay (SpriteKit).
This is the first part of rdar://problem/18391046; the second part
involves checking that overrides are sane.
Swift SVN r23147
This is a type that has ownership of a reference while allowing access to the
spare bits inside the pointer, but which can also safely hold an ObjC tagged pointer
reference (with no spare bits of course). It additionally blesses one
Foundation-coordinated bit with the meaning of "has swift refcounting" in order
to get a faster short-circuit to native refcounting. It supports the following
builtin operations:
- Builtin.castToBridgeObject<T>(ref: T, bits: Builtin.Word) ->
Builtin.BridgeObject
Creates a BridgeObject that contains the bitwise-OR of the bit patterns of
"ref" and "bits". It is the user's responsibility to ensure "bits" doesn't
interfere with the reference identity of the resulting value. In other words,
it is undefined behavior unless:
castReferenceFromBridgeObject(castToBridgeObject(ref, bits)) === ref
This means "bits" must be zero if "ref" is a tagged pointer. If "ref" is a real
object pointer, "bits" must not have any non-spare bits set (unless they're
already set in the pointer value). The native discriminator bit may only be set
if the object is Swift-refcounted.
- Builtin.castReferenceFromBridgeObject<T>(bo: Builtin.BridgeObject) -> T
Extracts the reference from a BridgeObject.
- Builtin.castBitPatternFromBridgeObject(bo: Builtin.BridgeObject) -> Builtin.Word
Presents the bit pattern of a BridgeObject as a Word.
BridgeObject's bits are set up as follows on the various platforms:
i386, armv7:
No ObjC tagged pointers
Swift native refcounting flag bit: 0x0000_0001
Other available spare bits: 0x0000_0002
x86_64:
Reserved for ObjC tagged pointers: 0x8000_0000_0000_0001
Swift native refcounting flag bit: 0x0000_0000_0000_0002
Other available spare bits: 0x7F00_0000_0000_0004
arm64:
Reserved for ObjC tagged pointers: 0x8000_0000_0000_0000
Swift native refcounting flag bit: 0x4000_0000_0000_0000
Other available spare bits: 0x3F00_0000_0000_0007
TODO: BridgeObject doesn't present any extra inhabitants. It ought to at least provide null as an extra inhabitant for Optional.
Swift SVN r22880
Some AST nodes and SIL instructions need to reference conformances for a
particular type. If that type was imported from Clang, however, the
conformance may not exist when the AST node or SIL function gets deserialized
later. The SIL case is the problem case: fragile SIL code may contain a
reference to a conformance never mentioned in the AST of the code being
compiled, and since conformances are synthesized on demand during type-checking,
this will lead to a crash. SIL deserialization isn't supposed to be doing
work on its own (though it ~can~ import new Clang decls at the moment), so
the best answer is to serialize the conformances directly, like we would with
specialized or inherited conformances.
We can probably do better here in the long run (we don't even unique
conformances like this within a module), but this should at least handle the
immediately known problem cases.
rdar://problem/18669402
Swift SVN r22857
SIL functions use AST GenericParamTypeDecls, but they don't have a useful
DeclContext, so they just use the AST module associated with the current
SILModule. However, when it comes time to reserialize referenced functions
with shared_external linkage (such as closures defined in fragile public
functions), the serializer was trying to cross-reference those generic
parameters rather than reserialize them, because they aren't part of the
current source file. And because these decls aren't attached to a specific
AST DeclContext, we can't properly cross-reference them---nor should we.
This commit introduces a targeted case in the cross-reference logic to force
re-serializing these declarations. In the long run we may want to reconsider
using AST GenericParamLists for SILFunctions.
rdar://problem/18673024
Swift SVN r22800
properties.
The main design change here is that, rather than having
purportedly orthogonal storage kinds and has-addressor
bits, I've merged them into an exhaustive enum of the
possibilities. I've also split the observing storage kind
into stored-observing and inherited-observing cases, which
is possible to do in the parser because the latter are
always marked 'override' and the former aren't. This
should lead to much better consideration for inheriting
observers, which were otherwise very easy to forget about.
It also gives us much better recovery when override checking
fails before we can identify the overridden declaration;
previously, we would end up spuriously considering the
override to be a stored property despite the user's
clearly expressed intent.
Swift SVN r22381
I can't actually reproduce the buildbot failure that happened last night, so
hopefully it will (a) happen again, so I can investigate, or (b) not happen
again.
Swift SVN r22230
FixNum.h and BCRecordLayout.h will move down into LLVM, APINotes
will move into Clang. Get the namespaces right before we start to move
files around.
Swift SVN r22218
conformances (22195 to 22199).
It broke tests:
Failing Tests (4):
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/Foundation_NSString.swift
Swift :: SIL/Serialization/deserialize_appkit.sil
Swift :: SIL/Serialization/deserialize_foundation.sil
Swift :: stdlib/NSStringAPI.swift
Swift SVN r22214
Doug had changed the comment but not the implementation -- we were still
serializing the containing module rather than the declaring nominal or
extension.
Found by enabling verification on deserialized decls (to come soon).
Swift SVN r22198
Previously, we depended on whether or not a serialized module was located
within a framework bundle to consider whether or not it may have a "Clang
half". However, LLDB loads serialized modules from dSYM bundles. Rather
than try to figure out if such a module is "really" a framework, just track
whether the original module was built with -import-underlying-module. If so,
consider the underlying Clang module to be re-exported.
rdar://problem/18099523
Swift SVN r21544
I'm not quite sure how to tickle this one, but the next commit adds more
data after the cached header, at which point existing tests break. This
could have already caused problems if no padding was needed in the bitstream.
Swift SVN r21543
Introduce an attribute that describes when a given CF type is
toll-free-bridged to an Objective-C class, and which class that
is. Use that information in the type checker to provide the CF <->
Objective-C toll-free-bridged conversions directly, rather than using
the user-defined conversion machinery.
Swift SVN r21376
We now have this information during parsing and throw it away during deserialization. This half-baked state works because all non-generic-extension clients only care about the module context.
Swift SVN r20833
Previously, we only retained the module in which a normal protocol
conformance occurred, which meant we either had to go searching for
the appropriate extension (yuck) or do without that information. This
is part of the separating-extension-archetypes work.
Swift SVN r20793
Previously, we were just storing setter accessibility via the accessibility
level on the setter function. However, some Stored properties never actually
have a setter synthesized, which led to the compiler dropping the setter
accessibility at serialization time. Rather than try to hack up something
clever, just store the setter accessibility explicitly in every
AbstractStorageDecl. (We still only serialize it for VarDecls, because
settable SubscriptDecls always have setter functions.)
<rdar://problem/17816530>
Swift SVN r20598
to emit fixit's when we rename something, e.g.:
t.swift:6:9: error: 'float' has been renamed to Float
var y : float
^~~~~
Float
Adopt this in the stdlib.
Swift SVN r20549
Expose Substitution's archetype, replacement, and conformances only through getters so we can actually assert invariants about them. To start, require replacement types to be materializable in order to catch cases where the type-checker tries to bind type variables to lvalue or inout types, and require the conformance array to match the number of protocol conformances required by the archetype. This exposes some latent bugs in the test suite I've marked as failures for now:
- test/Constraints/overload.swift was quietly suffering from <rdar://problem/17507421>, but we didn't notice because we never tried to codegen it.
- test/SIL/Parser/array_roundtrip.swift doesn't correctly roundtrip substitutions, which I filed as <rdar://problem/17781140>.
Swift SVN r20418
We do this so that the swiftmodule file contains all info necessary to
reconstruct the AST for debugging purposes. If the swiftmodule file is copied
into a dSYM bundle, it can (in theory) be used to debug a built app months
later. The header is processed with -frewrite-includes so that it includes
any non-modular content; the user will not have to recreate their project
structure and header maps to reload the AST.
There is some extra complexity here: a target with a bridging header
(such as a unit test target) may depend on another target with a bridging
header (such as an app target). This is a rare case, but one we'd like to
still keep working. However, if both bridging headers import some common.h,
we have a problem, because -frewrite-includes will lose the once-ness
of #import. Therefore, we /also/ store the path, size, and mtime of a
bridging header in the swiftmodule, and prefer to use a regular parse from
the original file if it can be located and hasn't been changed.
<rdar://problem/17688408>
Swift SVN r20128
To answer "did the user specify this, or is it implicit", stick a couple
of is-implicit bits in InfixOperatorDecl, and thread them through
serializaton/deserialization.
Swift SVN r20067
Also:
- merge the test/decl/func/functions_new.swift testcase into test/Sema/immutability.swift,
where the bulk of similar tests are.
- Move the type checking logic for 'dynamic' out of ValidateAttrs into TypeCheckAttrs
- Change the encoding for 'override' to 49 so that stuff vbr's so much more densely :-)
Swift SVN r20006
attribute. As part of this, introduce a new "NotSerialized" flag in Attr.def.
This eliminates a bunch of special case code in the parser and elsewhere for handling
this modifier.
Swift SVN r19997
